This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
J. R. Agnew and L. R. Szykman (2005) Asset allocation and information overload: the influence of information display, asset choice and investor experience. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6: 57–90.
J. R. Agnew , L. R. Anderson , J. R. Gerlach and L. R. Szykman (2008) Who chooses annuities? an experimental investigation of the role of gender, framing and defaults. American Economic Review, 98(2): 418–22.
L. R. Anderson and J. M. Mellor (2009) Are risk preferences stable? comparing an experimental measure with a validated survey-based measure. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 39: 137–160.
J. Banks and Z. Oldfield (2007) Understanding pensions: cognitive function, numerical ability, and retirement saving. Fiscal Studies, 28: 143–170.
R. B. Barsky , F. T. Juster , M. S. Kimball and M. D. Shapiro (1997) Preference parameters and behavioral heterogeneity: an experimental approach in the health and retirement study. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2): 537–579.
S. Benartzi and R. H. Thaler (1999) Risk aversion or myopia? choices in repeated gambles and retirement investments. Management Science, 45(3): 364–381.
S. Benartzi and R. H. Thaler (2001) Naïve diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. American Economic Review, 91(1): 79–97.
S. Benartzi and R. H. Thaler (2002) How much is investor autonomy worth? Journal of Finance, 57(4): 1593–1616.
J. Beshears , J. J. Choi , D. Laibson and B. C. Madrian (2009) The importance of default options for retirement saving outcomes: evidence from the United States. In J. R. Brown , J. Liebman and D. A. Wise (eds), Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 167–195.
J. R. Brown , N. Liang and S. J. Weisbenner (2007) Individual account investment options and portfolio choice: Behavioral lessons from 410(k) plans. Journal of Public Economics, 91(10): 1992–2013.
J. R. Brown , J. R. Kling , S. Mullainathan and M. V. Wrobel (2008) Why don't people insure late life consumption? a framing explanation of the under-annuitization puzzle. American Economic Review, 98(2): 304–309.
S. V. Burks , J. P. Carpenter , L. Goette and A. Rustichini (2009) Cognitive skills affect economic preferences, strategic behavior, and job attachment. Proceedings of the National Association of Sciences, 106(19): 7745–7750.
C. Dave , C. C. Eckel , C. A. Johnson and C. Rojas (2010) Eliciting risk preferences: when is simple better? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty. 41: 219–243.
T. Dohmen , A. Falk , D. Huffman , U. Sunde , J. Schupp and G. G. Wagner (2011) Individual risk attitudes: measurement, determinants and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association 9(3); 522–550.
D. G. Goldstein , E. J. Johnson and W. F. Sharpe (2008) Choosing outcomes versus choosing products: consumer-focused retirement investment advice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 440–456.
C. A. Holt and S. K. Laury (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review, 92(5): 1644–1655.
D. Kahneman and A. Tversky (1979) Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2): 263–291.
C. Kaufmann , M. Weber and E. Haisley (2013) The role of experience sampling and graphical displays on one's investment risk appetite. Management Science, 59(2): 323–340.
I. P. Levin , S. L. Schneider and G. J. Gaeth (1998) All frames are not created equal: a typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2): 149–188.
I. M. Lipkus (2007) Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Medical Decision Making, 27: 696–713.
J. Maule and G. Villejoubert (2007) What lies beneath: reframing framing effects. Thinking and Reasoning, 13(1): 25–44.
D. Revelt and K. Train (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choices: households’ choices of appliance efficiency level. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4): 647–657.
E. Rubaltelli , S. Rubichi , L. Savadori , M. Tedeschi and R. Ferretti (2005) Numerical information format and investment decisions: implications for the disposition effect and status quo bias. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 6(1): 19–26.
J. A. Schirillo and E. R. Stone (2005) The greater ability of graphical versus numerical displays to increase risk avoidance involves a common mechanism. Risk Analysis, 25(3): 555–566.
A. Tversky and D. Kahneman (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481): 453–458.
M. C. J. van Rooij , J. M. K. Clemens and H. M. Prast (2007) Risk-return preferences in the pension domain: are people able to choose? Journal of Public Economics, 91(3–4): 701–722.
I. Vlaev , N. Chater and N. Stewart (2009) Dimensionality of risk perception: factors affecting consumer understanding and evaluation of financial risk. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 10(3): 158–181.
E. U. Weber , N. Siebenmorgen and M. Weber (2005) Communicating asset risk: how name recognition and the format of historic volatility information affect risk perception and investment decisions. Risk Analysis, 25(3): 597–609.