Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Which plan to choose? The determinants of pension system choice for public school teachers*

  • DAN GOLDHABER (a1) and CYRUS GROUT (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

This paper examines a natural experiment in which Washington State teachers were offered the opportunity to choose between enrolling in a traditional defined benefit (DB) plan and a hybrid plan with DB and defined contribution (DC) components. We find plan preference is weakly related to estimates of the relative financial benefits of being in either the DB or hybrid system and strongly related to teacher age. Importantly, we also find that the majority of teachers prefer the hybrid plan, and that teachers opting into the hybrid plan tend to be more effective based on student output measures of teacher productivity. These results suggest that policy shifts toward pension systems that include DC options do not necessarily make teaching a less desirable profession, particularly for the most productive employees.

Copyright
Footnotes
Hide All

We are grateful to the Washington State Department of Retirement Systems and the Office of the Superintendent of Public Instruction for providing the confidential data used in this study. We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Joyce Foundation and the Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (CALDER), which is funded through Award #R305C120008 by the Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. We also benefitted from input on early drafts of this paper from Wes Bignell, Annie Pennucci, Cory Koedel, Josh McGee, and James Cowan, and two anonymous reviewers. Any and all errors are solely the responsibility of the study's authors, and the views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to their institutions, the study's funders, or the agencies supplying data.

Footnotes
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D. Aaronson , L. Barrow and W. Sander (2007) Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1): 95135. Retrieved from http://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/508733

B. Asch , S. J. Haider and J. Zissimopoulos (2005) Financial incentives and retirement: evidence from federal civil service workers. Journal of Public Economics, 89(2–3): 427440. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2003.12.006.

D. J. Boyd , H. Lankford , S. Loeb and J. H. Wyckoff (2005) Explaining the short careers of high-achieving teachers in schools with low-performing students. The American Economic Review, 95(2): 166171. Retrieved from http://www.teacherpolicyresearch.org/portals/1/pdfs/Explaining_the_short_careers_of_high_achieving_teachers_AER_final.pdf

J. R. Brown and S. J. Weisbenner (2009) Who chooses defined contribution plans? In J. Brown , J. Liebman and D. A. Wise (eds), Social Security Policy in a Changing Environment. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 131161.

J. R. Brown and S. J. Weisbenner (2014) Why do individuals choose defined contribution plans? Evidence from participants in a large public plan. Journal of Public Economics, 116: 3546. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2013.05.004.

S. Chan and A. H. Stevens (2004) Do changes in pension incentives affect retirement? A longitudinal study of subjective retirement expectations. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8): 13071333. doi: 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00223-2.

S. Chan and A. H. Stevens (2008) What you don't know can't help you: pension knowledge and retirement decision-making. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2): 253266. doi: 10.1162/rest.90.2.253.

M. M. Chingos and M. R. West (2012) Do more effective teachers earn more outside of the classroom? Education Finance and Policy, 7(1): 843.

R. L. Clark , L. S. Ghent and A. A. McDermed (2006) Plan choice among university faculty. Southern Economic Journal, 72(3): 560577.

S. P. Corcoran , W. N. Evans and R. S. Schwab (2004) Changing labor market opportunities for women and the quality of teachers 1957–1992. American Economic Review, 94(2): 230235. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282(200405)94:2<230:CLOFWA>2.0.CO;2-P

R. M. Costrell and M. Podgursky (2009) Peaks, cliffs, and valleys: the peculiar incentives in teacher retirement systems and their consequences for school staffing. Education Finance and Policy, 4(2): 175211. doi: 10.1162/edfp.2009.4.2.175.

R. Croson and U. Gneezy (2009) Gender differences in preferences. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(2): 448474. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.2.448.

M. DeArmond and D. Goldhaber (2010) Scrambling the nest egg: how well do teachers understand their pensions, and what do they think about alternative pension structures? Education Finance and Policy, 5(4): 558586. doi: 10.1162/EDFP_a_00010.

T. Dohmen and A. Falk (2011) Performance pay and multidimensional sorting: productivity, preferences, and gender. American Economic Review, 101(2): 556590.

S. Dorsey (1995) Pension portability and labor market efficiency: a survey of the literature. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 48(2): 276292.

J. Furgeson , R. P. Strauss and W. B. Vogt (2006) The effects of defined benefit pension incentives and working conditions on teacher retirement decisions. Education Finance and Policy, 1(3): 316348. Retrieved from http://uwashington.worldcat.org/oclc/89693972

P. Gerrans and G. L. Clark (2013) Pension plan participant choice: evidence on defined benefit and defined contribution preferences. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 12(04): 351378. doi: 10.1017/S1474747213000061.

D. Goldhaber , B. Gross and D. Player (2011) Teacher career paths, teacher quality, and persistence in the classroom: are public schools keeping their best? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(1): 5787. doi: 10.1002/pam.

M. S. Gutter , J. J. Fox and C. P. Montalto (1999) Racial differences in investor decision making. Financial Services Review, 8: 149162. Retrieved from http://www2.stetson.edu/fsr/abstracts2/V8-3

E. A. Hanushek and R. R. Pace (1995) Who chooses to teach (and Why)? Economics of Education Review, 14(2): 101117.

E. A. Hanushek , J. F. Kain and S. G. Rivkin (2004) Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2): 326354. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0022-166X(200421)39:2<326:WPSLT>2.0.CO;2-G

C. M. Hoxby and A. Leigh (2004) Pulled away or pushed out? Explaining the decline of teacher aptitude in the United States. American Economic Review, 94(2): 236240. Retrieved from http://proquest.umi.com.offcampus.lib.washington.edu/pqdweb?did=663187731&sid=1&Fmt=4&clientId=8991&RQT=309&VName=PQD

C. Koedel , M. Podgursky and S. Shi (2013) Teacher pension systems, the composition of the teaching workforce, and teacher quality. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3): 574596.

J. M. Krieg (2006) Teacher quality and attrition. Economics of Education Review, 25(1): 1327.

D. Lewin , J. H. Keefe and T. A. Kochan (2012) Unionism and collective bargaining in U.S. government. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 65(4): 749778.

A. Lusardi and O. S. Mitchell (2007) Financial literacy and retirement preparedness: evidence and implications for financial education. Business Economics, 42(1): 3544.

C. Nadler and M. Wiswall (2011) Risk aversion and support for merit pay: theory and evidence from Minnesota's Q comp program. Education Finance and Policy, 6(1): 75104.

R. Novy-Marx and J. Rauh (2011) Public pension promises: how big are they and what are they worth? Journal of Finance, 66(4): 12111249.

B. Scafidi , D. L. Sjoquist and T. R. Stinebrickner (2007) Race, poverty, and teacher mobility. Economics of Education Review, 26(2): 145159. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VB9-4HWXP46-2&_user=582538&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=582538&md5=fde3483d68494607b53087c1ea7888eb

D. Goldhaber and M. Hansen (2013) Is it just a bad class? Assessing the long-term stability of estimated teacher performance. Economica, 80(319), 589612.

E. A. Hanushek and S. G. Rivkin (2010) The Quality and Distribution of Teachers under the No Child Left Behind Act. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(3), 133150.

R. Chetty , J. N. Friedman and J. E. Rockoff (2014) Measuring the impacts of teachers II: Teacher value-added and student outcomes in adulthood. American Economic Review, 104(9), 2633–79.

D. F. McCaffrey , J. R. Lockwood , D. Koretz , T. A. Louis and L. Hamilton (2004) Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 67101.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Pension Economics & Finance
  • ISSN: 1474-7472
  • EISSN: 1475-3022
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-pension-economics-and-finance
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 161 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.