1. Heaton, J. H., “The Press Conference and Cable Rates: To the Editor of the Times,” Times, 29 June 1909.Google Scholar

2. New York Times, “A Baronet of the World,” 1 February 1912.

3. Léonard Laborie, L’Europe mise en réseaux: La France et la coopération internationale dans les postes et les télécommunications (années 1850–années 1950) (Brussels, 2011). On how this occurred during imperial fragmentation, see Headrick, Daniel R., The Tentacles of Progress: Technology Transfer in the Age of Imperialism, 1850–1940 (New York, 1988)Google Scholar; Winseck, Dwayne R. and Pike, Robert M., Communication and Empire: Media, Markets, and Globalization, 1860–1930 (Durham, 2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4. On the ITU, see also Lyall, Francis, International Communications: The International Telecommunication Union and the Universal Postal Union (Burlington, Vt., 2011)Google Scholar; Gabriele Balbi et al., Switzerland’s Role in the Genesis of the Telegraph Union, 1855–1875 (Berne, 2014); Codding, George, “The International Telecommunications Union: 130 Years of Telecommunications Regulation,” Denver Journal International Law & Policy 23, no. 3 (1994)Google Scholar; On telecommunications regulation after 1932, see Cowhey, Peter, “The International Telecommunications Regime: The Political Roots of Regimes for High Technology,” International Organization 44, no. 2 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Genschel, Philipp and Werle, Raymund, “From National Hierarchies to International Standardization: Modal Changes in the Governance of Telecommunications,” Journal of Public Policy 13, no. 3 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. On natural monopoly theory, see Wagner, Markus, “Legal Perspectives and Regulatory Philosophies on Natural Monopolies in the United States and Germany,” in Regulation between Legal Norms and Economic Reality: Intentions, Effects, and Adaptation: The German and American Experiences, ed. Schulz, Günther, Schmoeckel, Mathias, and Hausman, William J., 53–74Google Scholar; Sharkey, William W., The Theory of Natural Monopoly (Cambridge, 1989)Google Scholar; Averch, Harvey and Johnson, Leland L., “Behavior of the Firm under Regulatory Constraint,” American Economic Review 52, no. 5 (1962)Google Scholar; Mosca, Manuela, “On the Origins of the Concept of Natural Monopoly,” European Journal for the History of Economic Thought 45, no. 2 (2008).Google Scholar

6. Heaton, J. H., “A Cable Post: The Possibilities of Atlantic Submarine Communication,” North American Review 160, no. 463 (1895): 660.Google Scholar

7. Standage, Tom, The Victorian Internet: The Remarkable Story of the Telegraph and the Nineteenth Century’s Online Pioneers (London, 2003).Google Scholar

8. Schipper, Frank, “Access for All: Telegraph Reformers and Visions of Use, 1865–1914,” Comparativ 21, no. 6 (2011)Google Scholar; Winseck and Pike, Communication and Empire, 2007.

9. Drake, William, “The Rise and Decline of the International Communications Regime,” in Regulating the Global Information Society, ed. Marsden, C., 124–77 (London, 2005).Google Scholar

10. Nickles, David P., Under the Wire: How the Telegraph Changed Diplomacy (Cambridge, Mass., 2003), 5.Google Scholar

11. Winseck and Pike, Communication and Empire, 16; Telegraph Construction and Maintenance Company, The Telcon Story 1850–1950 (London, 1950), 25.

12. On the wiring of the Atlantic, see Müller, Simone M., Wiring the World: The Social and Cultural Creation of Global Telegraph Networks (New York, 2015).Google Scholar

13. Tully, John, “A Victorian Ecological Disaster: Imperialism, the Telegraph, and Gutta-Percha,” in Journal of World History 20, no. 4 (2009): 568.Google Scholar

14. Laborie, Léonard, “Globalizing the Telegraph: The ITU and the Governance of the First Globalization of Telecommunications,” in Global Communication Electric: Telegraphy and Its Actors in a Globalizing World, ed. Hampf, Michaela and Müller-Pohl, Simone (Frankfurt, 2013), 71.Google Scholar

15. Codding, “The International Telecommunications Union,” 502.

16. International Telecommunications Union, “From Morse to Multimedia: A History of the ITU,” in International Telecommunications Union: Celebrating 130 years, 1865–1995, ed. International Telecommunications Union, 38–69 (1995), 38; Laborie, L’Europe mise en réseaux; Drake, “The Rise and Decline,” 124; Reinalda, B., Routledge History of International Organizations: From 1815 to the Present Day (Oxon, 2009), 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

17. Bright, Charles, “The Extension of Submarine Telegraphy in a Quarter-Century: Reprinted from Engineering Magazine (December 1898),” in Development of Submarine Cable Communications, ed. Finn, B. S. (New York, 1980), 420.Google Scholar

18. Reinalda, Routledge History of International Organizations, 85.

19. Drake, “The Rise and Decline,” 124.

20. On the contemporary debate of cables during war, see Anderson, James, ed., Cables in Time of War Etc.: James Anderson Papers. Porthcurno Cable & Wireless Archive (London, 1886)Google Scholar; Bright, Charles, “An All-British or Anglo-American Pacific Cable,” in Imperial Telegraphic Communication, ed. Bright, Charles (London, 1911), 4–17.Google Scholar

21. Bright, Charles, Submarine Telegraphs: Their History, Construction, and Working (London, 1898)Google Scholar; founded in part on Wünschendorff's Traité de Télégraphie Sous-Marine and Compiled from Authoritative and Exclusive Sources, 154.

22. Brown, J., The Cable and Wireless Communications of the World: A Survey of Present Day Means of International Communication by Cable and Wireless (London, 1927), 11Google Scholar; Headrick, Daniel R., The Tentacles of Progress: Technology Transfer in the Age of Imperialism, 1850–1940 (New York, 1988), 105.Google Scholar

23. Bright, Submarine Telegraphs, 167.

24. Headrick, Tentacles of Progress, 105; Robert Boyce, “Imperial Dreams and National Realities: Britain, Canada, and the Struggle for a Pacific Telegraph Cable, 1879–1902,” English Historical Review 115, no. 460 (2000): 43.Google Scholar

25. Garratt, G. R. M., One Hundred Years of Submarine Cables (London, 1950), 29–30Google Scholar; Bright, Submarine Telegraphs, 125–26. On the Great Northern, see Yang, Daqing, “Submarine Cables and the Two Japanese Empires,” in Communications under the Seas, 230.Google Scholar

26. Griset, Pascal and Headrick, Daniel R., “Submarine Telegraph Cables: Business and Politics, 1838–1939,” Business History Review 75, no. 3 (2001): 543–78.Google Scholar

27. On the breakthrough of such a natural monopoly system, see the Siemens–Pender controversy in Müller, Wiring the World.

28. On “instantaneity,” see Sprenger, Florian, “Between the Ends of a Wire: Electricity, Instantaneity, and the World of Telegraphy,” in Global Communication Electric, 355–80.Google Scholar

29. Bright, Submarine Telegraphs, 143–44.

30. Anglo-American Telegraph Company Limited, “Tariff Book,” 9.

31. Heaton, J. H., “The Press Conference and Cable Rates: To the Editor of the Times,” Times, 29 June 1909CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

32. Cookson, Gillian, “‘Ruinous Competition’: The French Atlantic Telegraph of 1869,” Entreprises et Histoire 23 (1999): 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

33. Shulman, Peter, “Ben Franklin’s Ghost: World Peace, American Slavery, and the Global Politics of Information before the Universal Postal Union,” Journal for Global History 10, no. 2 (forthcoming, 2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

34. Daily News, “Telegraph Companies and Charges,” 17 February 1873.

35. John, Richard R., Network Nation: Inventing American Telecommunications (Cambridge Mass., 2010), 182.Google Scholar See also Hochfelder, David, The Telegraph in America, 1832–1920 (Baltimore, 2012).Google Scholar

36. Anderson, James, “Manifesto on Telegraph Charges, 1873,” cited in Daily News, 14 February 1873Google Scholar.

37. Times, “Mr. Henniker Heaton,” 9 August 1886.

38. Anderson, Benedict, Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (London, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

39. “The Belfast News-Letter,” Belfast News-Letter, 28 July 1866.

40. Müller-Pohl, Simone, “‘By Atlantic Telegraph’: A Study on Weltcommunication in the Nineteenth Century,” Medien & Zeit, no. 4 (2010): 40–54.Google Scholar Reports on the Fenian Raids in Canada were printed all over British newspapers throughout 1866.

41. The Editor, “Love Making by Telegraph,” The Telegraphist. A Monthly Journal for Postal, Telephone and Railway Telegraph Clerks, 1 December 1883, 4.

42. “Reuters Telegrams,” The Pall Mall Gazette, 11 October 1871.

43. “Epitome of Opinion in the Morning Journals,” The Pall Mall Gazette, 11 October 1871.

44. “News of the Day,” Birmingham Daily Post, 11 October 1871.

45. “The Burning of Chicago,” Birmingham Daily Post, 23 October 1871.

46. Osterhammel, Jürgen, Die Verwandlung der Welt: Eine Geschichte des 19. Jahrhunderts, (Munich, 2009), 235–37Google Scholar; Hobsbawm, Eric J., The Age of Empire: 1875–1914 (New York, 1989), 36–37.Google Scholar

47. Griset and Headrick, “Submarine Telegraph Cables,” 557; Auswärtiges Amt, Vorschriften Kabel von Emden über die Azoren nach Nord-Amerika, 15 March 1901, BArch R 901/ 80740, Bundesarchiv.

48. “The Anglo-American Telegraph Company,” Leeds Mercury, 15 January 1881.

49. Anderson, James, “Manifesto on Telegraph Charges, 1873,”Google Scholar cited in H.L., “Telegraph Companies and Charges.”

50. On globalization as a perspective, see Conrad, Sebastian and Eckert, Andreas, “Globalgeschichte, Globalisierung, multiple Modernen: Zur Geschichtsschreibung der modernen Welt,” in Globalgeschichte: Theorien, Ansätze, Themen, ed. Conrad, Sebastian (Frankfurt, 2007), 20.Google Scholar

51. “Telegraph Companies and Charges,” Daily News, 18 February 1873.

52. Laborie, L’Europe mise en réseaux; Drake, “The Rise and Decline,” 124.

53. Ibid.; Ahvenainen, “International Telegraph Union,” 64–65; Bureau International de l’Union Télégraphique, L'Union Télégraphique Internationale (1865–1915) (Berne, 1915), 9; Goldsmid, Frederic J., Telegraph and Travel: A Narrative of the Formation and Development of Telegraphic Communication between England and India, under the order of her Majesty’s Government, with incidental notices of the countries traversed by the lines (London, 1874).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

54. “The International Telegraph Conference,” Times, 20 July 1875.

55. “International Telegraph Conference,” Times, 23 June 1879.

56. Maver, William, “Ocean Telegraphy: Extract from the Electrical World [American],” The Telegraphist. A Monthly Journal for Postal, Telephone and Railway Telegraph Clerks 2, June (1884), 87–88.Google Scholar

57. Bright, Bright 1898, 175.

58. Ibid.

59. The Globe Telegraph Company, The Globe Telegraph Company: Report of the Proceedings at an Anniversary Banquet given by Mr. Cyrus Field of New York at The Buckingham Palace Hotel, London, 10.3.1873. In Commemoration of the Signature of the Agreement on the 10th of March, 1854 for the Establishment of a Telegraph Across the Atlantic, March 10, 1873, DOC/ETC/5/58 James Anderson Papers Box 1, Porthcurno Cable and Wireless Archive, 10Google Scholar.

60. Ibid.

61. Andrews, W., cited in “Foreign Telegrams: The New Regulations,” Manchester Guardian, 16 December 1875Google Scholar.

62. Internationale Telegraph Union, Internationale Telegraphen-Conferenz von St. Petersbourg: Vertrag, Dienstreglement und Tarifftabellen (Berne, 1875), 16Google Scholar; The Globe Telegraph Company, The Globe Telegraph Company: Report of the Proceedings at an Anniversary Banquet given by Mr. Cyrus Field of New York at The Buckingham Palace Hotel, London, 10.3.1873. In Commemoration of the Signature of the Agreement on the 10th of March, 1854 for the Establishment of a Telegraph Across the Atlantic, March 10, 1873, DOC/ETC/5/58, James Anderson Papers, Box 1, Porthcurno Cable and Wireless Archive, 10.

63. Internationale Telegraph Union, Internationale Telegraphen-Conferenz von St. Petersbourg: Vertrag, Dienstreglement und TarifftabellenGoogle Scholar, 16.

64. Reinalda, Routledge History of International Organizations, 87.

65. On von Stephan’s reform attempt, see Schipper, “Access for All.”

66. C. H. B. Patey cited in Anderson James, “International Telegraph Convention, London 1879, Proposal of British Post Office. Comments by Cable Companies Letter by James Anderson to Mr. Patey,” POST 30/361 Part I, BT Archives.

67. Ibid.

68. The question of representation was also debated in the Times of London in June 1879. Mercator, “International Telegraph Conference: To the Editor of the Times,” Times, 13 June 1879; Ernest M’Kenna, “The International Telegraph Conference: To the Editor of the Times,” Times, 17 June 1879; H. R. Meyer, “The International Telegraph Conference,” Times, 17 June 1879.

69. General Post Office, “Telegraph Conference 1879. Meeting of Representatives of Telegraph Companies in Mr. Patey’s Room,” 10 February 1879, BT ArchivesGoogle Scholar.

70. “International Telegrams,” Daily News, 26 July 1879.

71. Lee, Kelley, Global Telecommunications Regulation: A Political Economy Perspective (London, 1996), 59.Google Scholar

72. Reinalda, Routledge History of International Organizations, 88.

73. Andrews, cited in “Foreign Telegrams: The New Regulations,” Manchester Guardian, 16 December 1875.

74. Hobsbawm, The Age of Empire, 57.

75. Griset and Headrick, “Submarine Telegraph Cables,” 553.

76. Porter, Adrian, The Life and Letter of Sir John Henniker Heaton Bt.: By his Daughter Mrs. Adrian Porter with numerous Illustrations (New York, 1916), 10.Google Scholar

77. “Cable Rate Abuses: J. Henniker Heaton’s Call for a Universal 2-Cent Charge Stirs the Whole World,” New York Times, 29 November 1908.

78. Heaton, J. H., The Postal and Telegraphic Communication of the Empire: A Paper read before the Royal Colonial Institute on Tuesday, March 13, 1888 (London, 1888), 14–15Google Scholar; Heaton, “Wireless Telegraphy—Friend or Foe: To the Editor of the Times,” Times, 5 February 1903.

79. Heaton, “A Cable Post”; Heaton, “The Cable Telegraph System of the World,” Arena 38, no. 214 (September 1907); Heaton, “The World’s Cables and the Cable’s Rings,” Financial Review of Reviews (May 1908).

80. “The State Ownership of Cables: Mansion-House Meeting” and “Cable Reform,” Times, 12 December 1908.

81. Heaton, “Penny-a-Word Telegrams throughout the Empire,” 15.

82. Ibid., 16.

83. Heaton, “Penny-a-Word Telegrams throughout the Empire,” 12.

84. Heaton, “A Cable Post,” 661.

85. Heaton, The Postal and Telegraphic Communication, 13.

86. Heaton, “A Postal Magna Charta: To the Editor of the Times,” Times, 24 August 1895.

87. Heaton, cited in Bright, Submarine Telegraphs, 173.

88. Heaton, “A Postal Magna Charta.”

89. Heaton, The Postal and Telegraphic Communication, 3.

90. Heaton, “A Cable Post.”

91. Hills, Jill, The Struggle for Control of Global Communication: The Formative Century (Urbana, 2002), 5.Google Scholar

92. Ibid.

93. Headrick, Tools of Empire, 162.

94. Heaton, J. H., “Imperial Telegraph Cables: To the Editor of the Times,” Times, 3 March 1902Google Scholar.

95. Heaton, “The Press Conference and Cable Rates.

96. Pender, John, “The Pacific Cable. Letter to Sir Charles Tupper,” Times, 1 June 1894Google Scholar; Winseck and Pike, Communication and Empire, 180, 337.

97. Winseck and Pike, Communication and Empire, 175.

98. Anderson, James cited in Daily News, “Telegraph Companies and Charges,” 18 February 1873Google Scholar.

99. Anderson’s argument is indirectly quoted by Heaton in the following: Heaton, “A Cable Post,” 661; on transatlantic mail traffic, see Shulman, “Ben Franklin’s Ghost.”

100. Bright, Charles, “Universal Penny-a-word Telegraphy: Letter to the Editor,” Times, 18 November 1908Google Scholar.

101. Heaton, “Universal Penny-a-word Telegraphy: To the Editor of the Times,” Times, 18 November 1908.