Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-n4bck Total loading time: 0.325 Render date: 2022-08-08T04:31:45.996Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Feasibility of the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM) in an acute psychiatric ward

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 October 2011

Valborg Helseth*
Affiliation:
Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Oslo, Norway Blakstad Hospital, Division for Mental Health and Addiction, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Norway
Sharon Samet
Affiliation:
Columbia University, School of Social Work, New York, USA
Jon Johnsen
Affiliation:
Blakstad Hospital, Division for Mental Health and Addiction, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Norway
Jørgen G Bramness
Affiliation:
Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Oslo, Norway Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway
Helge Waal
Affiliation:
Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Oslo, Norway Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
*
Correspondence to: Dr Valborg Helseth, Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research, Kirkeveien 166, N-0407 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: v.h.helseth@medisin.uio.no
Get access

Abstract

Background: The highly prevalent comorbidity of substance use disorders and psychiatric disorders represents challenges concerning diagnosis and treatment in acute psychiatric wards.

Aims: To study the feasibility of the first Norwegian version of the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM) in an acute psychiatric ward.

Methods: 61 consecutively admitted substance abusing patients, presenting with mood symptoms, psychotic symptoms, or both, were interviewed. Assessments included variables concerning the way the interviews were carried out.

Results: 51% of eligible patients were interviewed. The main reason for non-inclusion was short stay on the ward. Median interview time was 155 minutes and median number of interview sessions was three.

Conclusion: It was possible to use the PRISM in a busy acute psychiatric ward. Patients mainly had positive reactions to this extensive interview.

Type
Original Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © NAPICU 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrews, G. and Peters, L. (1998) The psychometric properties of the composite international diagnostic interview. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 33(2): 8088.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaton, D.E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F. and Ferraz, M.B. (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25(24): 31863191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berman, A.H., Bergman, H., Palmstierna, T. and Schlyter, F. (2005) Evaluation of the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) in criminal justice and detoxification settings and in a Swedish population sample. European Addiction Research. 11(1): 2231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonsack, C., Camus, D., Kaufmann, N., Aubert, A.C., Besson, J., Baumann, P., Borgeat, F., Gillet, M. and Eap, C.B. (2006) Prevalence of substance use in a Swiss psychiatric hospital: interview reports and urine screening. Addictive Behaviors. 31(7): 12521258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryant, K.J., Rounsaville, B., Spitzer, R.L. and Williams, J.B. (1992) Reliability of dual diagnosis: substance dependence and psychiatric disorders. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 180(4): 251257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carey, K.B. and Correia, C.J. (1998) Severe mental illness and addictions: assessment considerations. Addictive Behaviors. 23(6): 735748.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endicott, J. (2001) Good diagnoses require good diagnosticians: collecting and integrating the data. American Journal of Medical Genetics. 105(1): 4849.3.0.CO;2-M>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endicott, J., Spitzer, R.L., Fleiss, J.L. and Cohen, J. (1976) The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Archives of General Psychiatry. 33(6): 766771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M. and Williams, J.B.W. (1995) Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders-Patient Edition (SCID I/P, Version 2.0). New York: New York State Psychiatric Institute, Biometrics Research Department.Google Scholar
Flovig, J.C., Vaaler, A.E. and Morken, G. (2009) Substance use at admission to an acute psychiatric department. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 63(2): 113119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C. and Beaton, D. (1993) Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 46(12): 14171432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasin, D.S., Trautman, K.D., Miele, G.M., Samet, S., Smith, M. and Endicott, J. (1996) Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM): reliability for substance abusers. American Journal of Psychiatry. 153(9): 11951201.Google ScholarPubMed
Hasin, D., Samet, S., Nunes, E., Meydan, J., Matseoane, K. and Waxman, R. (2006) Diagnosis of comorbid psychiatric disorders in substance users assessed with the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders for DSM-IV. American Journal of Psychiatry. 163(4): 689696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Helseth, V., Lykke-Enger, T., Johnsen, J. and Waal, H. (2009) Substance use disorders among psychotic patients admitted to inpatient psychiatric care. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 63(1): 7277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kranzler, H.R., Kadden, R.M., Babor, T.F., Tennen, H. and Rounsaville, B.J. (1996) Validity of the SCID in substance abuse patients. Addiction. 91(6): 859868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D.V., Weiller, E., Amorim, P., Bonora, I., Harnett Sheehan, K., Janavs, J. and Dunbar, G.C. (1997) The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. European Psychiatry. 12(5): 224231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maneesriwongul, W., and Dixon, J.K. (2004) Instrument translation process: a methods review. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 48(2): 175186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, P.R. (2002) Inpatient diagnostic assessments: 3. Causes and effects of diagnostic imprecision. Psychiatry Research. 111(2–3): 191197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, P.R., Dasher, R., Collins, R., Griffiths, P. and Brown, F. (2001) Inpatient diagnostic assessments: 1. Accuracy of structured vs. unstructured interviews. Psychiatry Research. 105(3): 255264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mordal, J., Gundersen, O. and Bramness, J.G. (2010) Norwegian version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview: feasibility, acceptability and test-retest reliability in an acute psychiatric ward. European Psychiatry. 25(3): 172177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mordal, J., Holm, B., Gossop, M., Romoren, M., Morland, J. and Bramness, J.G. (2011) Psychoactive substance use among patients admitted to an acute psychiatric ward: laboratory findings and associations with clinical characteristics. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry. 65(3): 208215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramirez Basco, M., Bostic, J.Q., Davies, D., Rush, A.J., Witte, B., Hendrickse, W. and Barnett, V. (2000) Methods to improve diagnostic accuracy in a community mental health setting. American Journal of Psychiatry. 157(10): 15991605.Google Scholar
Ross, H.E., Swinson, R., Doumani, S. and Larkin, E.J. (1995) Diagnosing comorbidity in substance abusers: a comparison of the test-retest reliability of two interviews. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 21(2): 167185.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samet, S., Nunes, E.V. and Hasin, D. (2004) Diagnosing comorbidity: concepts, criteria, and methods. Acta Neuropsychiatrica. 16(1): 918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Samet, S., Waxman, R., Hatzenbuehler, M. and Hasin, D.S. (2007) Assessing addiction: concepts and instruments. Addiction Science and Clinical Practice. 4(1): 1931.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saunders, J.B., Aasland, O.G., Babor, T.F., de la Fuente, J.R. and Grant, M. (1993) Development of the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT): WHO Collaborative Project on Early Detection of Persons with Harmful Alcohol Consumption-II. Addiction. 88(6): 791804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schanzer, B.M., First, M.B., Dominguez, B., Hasin, D.S. and Caton, C.L. (2006) Diagnosing psychotic disorders in the emergency department in the context of substance use. Psychiatric Services. 57(10): 14681473.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheehan, D.V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K.H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., Hergueta, T., Baker, R. and Dunbar, G.C. (1998) The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 59(Suppl. 20): 2233.Google ScholarPubMed
Spitzer, R.L., Williams, J.B., Gibbon, M. and First, M.B. (1992) The Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (SCID). I: History, rationale, and description. Archives of General Psychiatry. 49(8): 624629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torrens, M., Serrano, D., Astals, M., Perez-Dominguez, G. and Martin-Santos, R. (2004) Diagnosing comorbid psychiatric disorders in substance abusers: validity of the Spanish versions of the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. American Journal of Psychiatry. 161(7): 12311237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Torrens, M., Gilchrist, G. and Domingo-Salvany, A. (2011) Psychiatric comorbidity in illicit drug users: substance-induced versus independent disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 113(2–3): 147156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, W.L., Lee, H.L. and Fetzer, S.J. (2006) Challenges and strategies of instrument translation. Western Journal of Nursing Research. 28(3): 310321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittchen, H.U. (1994) Reliability and validity studies of the WHO-Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI): a critical review. Journal of Psychiatric Research. 28(1): 5784.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wittchen, H.U., Robins, L.N., Cottler, L.B., Sartorius, N., Burke, J.D. and Regier, D. (1991) Cross-cultural feasibility, reliability and sources of variance of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI). The Multicentre WHO/ADAMHA Field Trials. British Journal of Psychiatry. 159: 645653, 658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
1
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Feasibility of the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM) in an acute psychiatric ward
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Feasibility of the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM) in an acute psychiatric ward
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Feasibility of the Psychiatric Research Interview for Substance and Mental Disorders (PRISM) in an acute psychiatric ward
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *