Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T17:36:37.763Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Political Economy of Imperfect Competition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2008

Amitai Etzioni
Amitai Etzioni
Affiliation:
University Professor, George Washington U, Washington DC
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Economic actors command political power as well as economic power. It is used to the same effect to create monopolies and oligopolies. The two powers can be combined; e.g., aside from monopolies based only on economic power or only on government intervention, there are especially powerful monopolies that command both powers. The stability of the various power holders is related to the nature of their power base; pure economic power is particularly unstable. However, economic power can be more readily amassed than interventionist power, which violates norms, and has a sharply declining marginal utility. When the effects of interventionist power are added to those of economic power, economies such as America, which are often classified as quite competitive, turn out to be much less so.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Public Policy , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , May 1985 , pp. 169 - 186
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAHY

Asch, Peter (1983) Industrial Organization and Anti-Trust Policy. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Baumol, William J.; Panzar, John C.; and Willig, Robert D. (1982) Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, Inc.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel (1975) ‘The Revolution of Rising Entitlement’, Fortune, 04.Google Scholar
Brock, William A. (1983) ‘Contestable Markets and the Theory of Industry Structure: A Review Article’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 91, No. 6, pp. 1055–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Browning, Edgar K. and Browning, Jacquelene M. (1983) Microeconomic Theory and Applications. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Buchanan, J., Tollison, R., Tullock, G. (1980) Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society. College Station: Texas A & M University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1971) Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Demsetz, Harold (1974) ‘Two Systems of Belief About Monopoly’, Industrial Concentration: The New Learning, Goldschmid, Harvey J., Ed., et. al. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.Google Scholar
Downs, Anthony (1967) Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown and Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, Amitai (1984) Capital Corruption. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Friedman, Milton (1962, 1982) Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, John Kenneth (1967) The New Industrial State. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Goulden, Joseph C. (1984) The Death Merchant. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Greer, Douglas F. (1980) Industrial Organization and Public Policy. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co., Inc.Google Scholar
Kamerschen, David R. and Valentine, Lloyd M. (1981) Intermediate Microeconomic Theory, Second Edition. Cincinnati: South-Western Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. (1984) After Hegemony. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr, (1958) Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, Fourth Edition. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell.Google Scholar
Kim, Moshe (1984) ‘The Beneficiaries of Trucking Regulation, and Producer Gains in the Education Industry’, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 27 (04) pp. 227–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koch, James V. (1980) Industrial Organization and Prices. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Krueger, Anne O. (1974) ‘The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society’, American Economic Review, Vol. 64 (06) pp. 291–303.Google Scholar
Kwoka, John E. Jr, (1984) ‘Magical Mystery Tour’, Society, Vol. 22, No. 1 (11/12), pp. 10–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, Eugene M. (1977) ‘It's the Little Guys Who Need Export Aid’, Journal of Small Business Management, Vol. 15, pp. 7–9.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. (1969) The End of Liberalism. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
McConnell, Campbell R. (1975) Economics, Sixth Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Navarro, Peter, 1984. The Policy Game: How Special Interests and Ideologists are Stealing America. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Needham, Douglas (1969) Economic Analysis and Industrial Structure, NY: Holt Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William A. Jr (1971) Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine, Atherton.Google Scholar
Novak, Michael (1982) The Spirit of Democratic Socialism. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur (1982) The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ornstein, Norman J. and Shirley Elder (1978) Interest Groups, Lobbying and Policymaking. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Pashigian, Peter B. (1984) ‘The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Optimal Plant Size and Factor Shares’, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 27 (1), 04, pp. 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzman, Sam (1976) ‘Toward A More General Theory of Regulation’, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 19(2), 08, pp. 211–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phelps, Edmund S. (1975) ‘Introduction’, Altruism, Morality, and Economic Theory. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A. (1975) ‘The Social Costs of Monopoly and Regulation’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 83 (08) pp. 807–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riesman, David (1950) The Lonely Crowd. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E. E. (1935) Politics, Pressures, and the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Scherer, F. M. 1980. Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Shepherd, William G. (1982) ‘Causes of Increased Competition in the U.S.’, The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 64 (11) pp. 613–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smiley, Robert and Ravid, S. A. (1981) ‘The Importance of Being First: Learning, Price and Strategy’, Working Paper, Cornell University, August.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1962) ‘What Can Regulators Regulate?: The Case of Electricity’, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 5, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1968) ‘Competition’, International Institute of Social Science. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Stigler, George J. (1971) ‘The Theory of Economic Regulation’, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Spring, pp. 3–21.Google Scholar
Stuart, Reginald (1984) ‘To Regulate, to Deregulate Or, Now, to Reregulate’, The New York Times, Monday, 10 29, 1984.Google Scholar
Thurow, Lester C. (1980) The Zero-Sum Society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Tolchin, Susan and Tolchin, Martin (1983) Dismantling America: The Rush to Deregulate. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Toma, Eugenia Froedge (1983) ‘Institutional Structures, Regulation, and Producer Gains in the Education Industry’, Journal of Law and Economics, Vol. 26 (04) pp. 103–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tullock, Gordon (1967) ‘The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolies, and Theft’, Western Economic Journal, Vol. 5 (06) pp. 224–32.Google Scholar
White, Alice Patricia (1983) The Dominant Firm: A Study of Market Power. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Research Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, Graham K. 1981. Interest Groups in the United States. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Zeckhauser, Richard (1982) Review of ‘Toward a Theory of the Rent-Seeking Society’, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 90 (12) pp. 1303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar