Skip to main content

Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between


Policy protagonists are keen to claim that policy is successful while opponents are more likely to frame policies as failures. The reality is that policy outcomes are often somewhere in between these extremes. An added difficulty is that policy has multiple dimensions, often succeeding in some respects but not in others, according to facts and their interpretation. This paper sets out a framework designed to capture the bundles of outcomes that indicate how successful or unsuccessful a policy has been. It reviews existing literature on policy evaluation and improvement, public value, good practice, political strategy and policy failure and success in order to identify what can be built on and gaps that need to be filled. It conceives policy as having three realms: processes, programs and politics. Policies may succeed and/or fail in each of these and along a spectrum of success, resilient success, conflicted success, precarious success and failure. It concludes by examining contradictions between different forms of success, including what is known colloquially as good politics but bad policy.

Corresponding author
Address for Correspondence Professor Allan McConnell Department of Government and International Relations University of Sydney Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia e-mail:
Hide All
Althaus, C., Bridgman, P. and Davis, G. (2007) The Australian policy handbook. 4th Edition, Crows Nest, New South Wales: Allen & Unwin.
Amnesty International (2008) State of denial: Europe's role in rendition and secret detention. London: Amnesty International.
Auerswald, P. E., Branscomb, L. M., La Porte, T. M. and Michel-Kerjan, E. O. (eds.) (2007) Seeds of disaster, roots of response: How private action can reduce public vulnerability. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bachrach, P. and Baratz, M. (1970) Power and poverty: Theory and practice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bardach, E. (2009) A practical guide for policy analysis: The eightfold path to more effective problem solving. 3rd Edition, Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Bell, S. and Hindmoor, A. (2009) Rethinking governance: The centrality of the state in modern society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bishop, P. and Davis, G. (2002) Mapping public participation in policy choices. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 61(1): 1429.
Boin, A., 't Hart, P., Stern, E. and Sundelius, B. (2005) The politics of crisis management: Public leadership under pressure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bovens, M. (2010) A comment on Marsh and McConnell: Towards a framework for understanding policy success, Public Administration, 88(2): 584585.
Bovens, M. and 't Hart, P. (1996) Understanding policy fiascoes. New Brunswick, Transaction.
Bovens, M., 't Hart, P. and Peters, B. G. (eds.) (2001a) Success and failure in public governance: A comparative analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Bovens, M., 't Hart, P. and Peters, B. G. (2001b) Analysing governance success and failure in six european states. In Bovens, M., 't Hart, P. and Peters, B. G. (eds.), Success and failure in public governance: A comparative analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1226.
Bovens, M., 't Hart, P., Peters, B. G., Albæk, E., Busch, A., Dudley, G., Moran, M. and Richardson, J. (2001c) Patterns of governance: Sectoral and national comparisons. in Bovens, M., 't Hart, P. and Peters, B. G. (eds.), Success and failure in public governance: A comparative analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 593640.
Boyne, G. A. (2003) What is public sector improvement? Public Administration, 81(2): 211227.
Boyne, G. A. (2004) Explaining public service improvement: Does management matter? Public Policy and Administration, 19(4): 100117.
Braybrooke, D. and Lindblom, C. E. (1970) A strategy of decision: Policy evaluation as social process. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Butler, D., Adonis, A. and Travers, T. (1994) Failure in British government: The politics of the poll tax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carson, L. and Martin, B. (1999) Random selection in politics. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Committee on Foreign Affairs (2007) Extraordinary rendition in US counterterrorism policy: The impact on transatlantic relations. Joint hearing before the subcommittee on international organizations, human rights, and oversight and the subcommittee on europe of the committee on foreign affairs. House of Representatives: Washington, DC.
Crick, B. (1962) In defence of politics. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
Davidson, E. J. (2005) Evaluation methodology basics: The nuts and bolts of sound evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dunleavy, P. (1995) Policy disasters: Explaining the UK's record. Public Policy and Administration, 10(2): 5270.
Dye, T. R. (2005) Understanding public policy. 11th edition, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Easton, D. (1953) The political system. New York, NY: Knopf.
Easton, D. (1965) A systems analysis of political life. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
Edelman (1977) Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York, NY: Academic Press.
Edelman, M. (1988) Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fischer, F. (1995) Evaluating public policy. Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
Fischer, F. (2003) Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gastil, J. (2008) Political communication and deliberation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Goldfinch, S. (2006) Rituals of reform, policy transfer, and the national university corporation reforms of Japan. Governance, 19(4): 585604.
Gupta, D. and Sathye, M. (2009) Turnaround of the Indian railways: a public ownership saga. International Journal of Public Policy, 5(1): 86102.
Gupta, D. K. (2001) Analyzing public policy: Concepts, tools, and techniques, Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Gutmann, A. and Thompson, D. (2004) Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hall, P. G. (1982) Great planning disasters. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Handmer, J. and Dovers, S. (2007) Handbook of disaster and emergency policies and institutions. London: Earthscan.
Harlow, C. (2002) Accountability, new public management, and the problems of the child support agency. Journal of Law and Society, 26(2): 150174.
Head, B. W. (2008) Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy 3(2): 101118.
Hood, C. C. and Margetts, H. Z. (2007) The tools of government in the digital age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Howlett, M. (2010 forthcoming). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hulme, D. and Moore, K. (2007) Why has microfinance been a policy success in Bangladesh? in Development success: Statecraft in the south (ed.) Bebbington, A. and McCourt, W.105139. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Ingram, H.M., and. Mann, D.E (eds.) (1980) Why policies succeed or fail. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Kerr, D. H. (1976) The logic of “policy” and successful policies. Policy Sciences, 7(3): 351363.
Lasswell, H. D. (1956) The decision process. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.
Lasswell, H. D. (1971) A pre-view of policy sciences. New York, NY: American Elsevier.
Lindblom, C. E. (1965) The intelligence of democracy. New York, NY: Free Press.
LindblomC., E C., E (1959) The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, XIX(2): 7988.
Machiavelli, N. (1961) The prince. Middlesex: Penguin.
Marsh, D. and McConnell, A. (2010a) Towards a framework for establishing policy success. Public Administration, 88(2): 586587.
Marsh, D. and McConnell, A. (2010b) Towards a framework for establishing policy success: A reply to Bovens. Public Administration 88(2): 564583.
May, P. J., Sapotichne, J. and Workman, S. (2009) Widespread policy disruption: Terrorism, public risks, and homeland security. Policy Studies Journal 37(2): 171194.
McConnell, A. (2010) Understanding policy success: Rethinking public policy. BasingstokePalgrave Macmillan.
McEntire, D. A. (2007) Disaster response and recovery. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Miller, G. J. and Robbins, D. (2007) Cost-Benefit Analysis. in Handbook of public policy analysis: Theory, politics, and methods. Fischer, F., Miller, G. J. and Sidney, M. S.. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 465480.
Mintrom, M. (2003) People skills for policy analysts. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Moore, M. H. (1995) Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nagel, S. (1980) Series editor's introduction. in Ingram, H. M. and Mann, D. E. (eds.), Why policies succeed or fail. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 710.
O'Neill, M. K. and Primus, W. E. (2005) Recent data trends show welfare reform to be a mixed success: Significant policy changes should accompany reauthorization. Review of Policy Research, 22(3): 301324.
Osborne, S. P. (ed.) (2009) The new public governance? Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. Routledge: Abingdon.
Patashnik, E. M. (2008) Reforms at risk: What happens after major policy changes are enacted? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Pawson, R. (2006) Evidence-based policy: A realist perspective. London: Sage.
Pollack, H. (2007) Learning to walk slow: America's partial policy success in the arena of intellectual disability. Journal of Policy History, 19(1): 95112.
Reason, J. (1997) Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot, Ashgate.
Rhodes, R. A. A. and Wanna, J. (2007) The limits to public value, or rescuing responsible government from the platonic guardians. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 66(4): 406421.
Rhodes, R. A. A. and Wanna, J. (2008) Stairways to heaven: A reply to Alford. Australia Journal of Public Administration, 67(3): 367370.
Rhodes, R. A. A. and Wanna, J. (2009) Bringing the politics back in Public value in Westminster parliamentary government. Public Administration, 87(2): 161183.
Rittel, H. W. W. and Webber, M. M. (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2): 155169.
Rose, Richard (1984) Understanding big government. London: Sage Publications.
Sanderson, I. (2002) Evaluation, policy learning and evidence-based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1): 122.
Schneider, A. L. and Ingram, H. (1997) Policy design for democracy. Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
Schön, D. A. and Rein, M. (1994) Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Schwartz, H. (2006) Explaining Australian economic success: Good policy or good luck? Governance, 19(2): 173205.
Shapiro, I. (1999) Enough of deliberation: Politics is about interest and power. in Macedo, S. (ed.), Deliberative Politics. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2838.
Steenhuisen, B. and van Eeten, M. (2008) Invisible trade-offs of public values: Inside Dutch railways. Public Money & Management, 28(3): 147152.
Stoker, G. (2006) Why politics matters: Making democracy work. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Stone, D. (2002) Policy paradox: The art of political decision making. 2nd edition, New York, NY: W.W. Norton.
Stringer, J. K. and Richardson, J. J. (1979) Managing the political agenda: Problem definition and policy making in Britain. Parliamentary Affairs, 33(1): 2339.
Taylor, D. and Balloch, S. (ed.) (2005) The politics of evaluation: Participation and policy implementation. Bristol: The Policy Press.
Thompson, J. B. (2000) Political scandal: Power and visibility in the modern age. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Tiffen, R. (1999) Scandals, media, politics and corruption in contemporary Australia. Sydney: UNSW Press.
van Gestel, N., Koppenjan, J.Schrijver, I., van de Ven, A. and Veeneman, W. (2008) Managing public values in public-private networks: A comparative study of innovative public infrastructure projects. Public Money & Management, 28(3): 139145.
Weimer, D. L. and Vining, A. R. (2005) Policy analysis: Concepts and practice. 5th edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Wildavsky, A. (1987) Speaking truth to power: The art and craft of policy analysis. 2nd edition, New Brunswick: Transaction.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed