Skip to main content
×
Home

Upsetting the agenda: the clout of external focusing events in the European Council

  • Petya Alexandrova (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

Focusing events are sudden, striking large-scale occurrences that attract political attention. However, not all potential focusing events appear on the agenda. Combining data from multiple sources, this study conducts an analysis of the determinants of prioritisation of external focusing events in the European Council over a period longer than two decades. The results demonstrate that decisions regarding the placement of crises on the agenda are underscored by exogenous (humanitarian) and endogenous (geopolitical interest) considerations. Those events with a higher likelihood of agenda access include manmade incidents (versus natural disasters), events with larger death tolls and crises in the neighbourhood. Stronger competition between potential focusing events across time and space reduces the chances of access. The level of attention each event receives depends on purely strategic interests. Focusing events in neighbouring countries gain a higher portion of attention, as do occurrences in states having a larger trade exchange with the European Union.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alexander D. (1997) The Study of Natural Disasters, 1977–1997: Some Reflections on a Changing Field of Knowledge. Disasters 21(4): 284304.
Alexandrova P., Carammia M., Princen S. and Timmermans A. (2014) Measuring the European Council Agenda: Introducing a New Approach and Dataset. European Union Politics 15(1): 152167.
Alexandrova P., Carammia M. and Timmermans A. (2012) Policy Punctuations and Issue Diversity on the European Council Agenda. Policy Studies Journal 40(1): 6988.
Baumgartner F. R. and Jones B. D. (1993) Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Birkland T. A. (1997) After Disaster: Agenda Setting, Public Policy, and Focusing Events. Washington: Georgetown University Press.
Birkland T. A. (1998) Focusing Events, Mobilization, and Agenda Setting. Journal of Public Policy 18(1): 5374.
Birkland T. A. (2004) “The World Changed Today”: Agenda-Setting and Policy Change in the Wake of the September 11 Terrorist Attacks. Review of Policy Research 21(2): 179200.
Birkland T. A. (2006) Lessons of Disaster: Policy Change After Catastrophic Events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Birkland T. A. and Nath R. (2000) Business and Political Dimensions in Disaster Management. Journal of Public Policy 20(3): 275303.
Boin A., t’Hart P., Stern E. and Sundelius B. (2005) The Politics of Crisis Management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bulmer S. and Wessels W. (1987) The European Council: Decision-Making in European Politics. Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press Ltd.
Chien H. (2013) Policy Change Or Policy Intractability in Post-Crisis Landscape? The Fukushima Explosion and Comparative Nuclear Energy Policy. Public Administration and Policy 56: 117146.
Cristiani D. and Fabiani R. (2013) The Malian Crisis and its Actors. The International Spectator 48(3): 7897.
de Schoutheete P. (2012) The European Council. In Peterson J. and Shackleton M. (eds.), The Institutions of the European Union, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 4367.
Downs A. (1972) Up and Down with Ecology: The “Issue-Attention Cycle”. Public Interest 28: 3850.
Drury A. C., Olson R. S. and Van Belle D. A. (2005) The Politics of Humanitarian Aid: US Foreign Disaster Assistance, 1964–1995. Journal of Politics 67(2): 454473.
Dudley L. and Montmarquette C. (1976) A Model of the Supply of Bilateral Foreign Aid. American Economic Review 66(1): 132142.
Faulkner B. (2001) Towards a Framework for Tourism Disaster Management. Tourism Management 22(2): 135147.
Freudenburg W. R., Coleman C., Gonzales J. and Helgeland C. (1996) Media Coverage of Hazard Events: Analyzing the Assumptions. Risk Analysis 16(1): 3142.
Gomez R. and Peterson J. (2001) The EU’s Impossibly Busy Foreign Ministers: ‘No One is in Control’. European Foreign Affairs Review 6(1): 5374.
Gundel S. (2005) Towards a New Typology of Crises. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 13(3): 106115.
Jones B. D. (2001) Politics and the Architecture of Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jones B. D. and Baumgartner F. R. (2005) The Politics of Attention. How Government Prioritizes Problems. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kaplan S. S. (1975) The Distribution of Aid to Latin America: A Cross-National Aggregate Data and Time Series Analysis. The Journal of Developing Areas 10(1): 3760.
Kato M. (1969) A Model of US Foreign Aid Allocation: An Application of a Rational Decision-Making Scheme. In Mueller J. E. (ed.), Approaches to Measurement in International Relations. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 198215.
Kingdon J. W. (2011) Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies, 2nd ed., updated. Boston, MA: Longman.
Liu X., Lindquist E. and Vedlitz A. (2011) Explaining Media and Congressional Attention to Global Climate Change, 1969–2005: An Empirical Test of Agenda-Setting Theory. Political Research Quarterly 64(2): 405419.
Maurer H. and Simão L. (2013) From Regional Power to Global Power? The European Neighbourhood Policy After the Lisbon Treaty. In Boening A. , Kremer J. and van Loon A. (eds.), Global Power Europe – Vol. 1. Theoretical and Institutional Approaches to the EU's External Relations. Heidelberg: Springer, 93108.
McGillivray M. and Oczkowski E. (1991) Modelling the Allocation of Australian Bilaterial Aid: A Two-Part Sample Selection Approach. Economic Record 67(2): 147152.
McGillivray M. and Oczkowski E. (1992) A Two-Part Sample Selection Model of British Bilateral Foreign Aid Allocation. Applied Economics 24(12): 13111319.
McKinlay R. D. (1979) The Aid Relationship: A Foreign Policy Model and Interpretation of the Distributions of Official Bilateral Economic Aid of the United States, the United Kingdom, France, and Germany, 1960–1970. Comparative Political Studies 11(4): 411464.
McKinlay R. D. and Little R. (1977) A Foreign Policy Model of U.S. Bilateral Aid Allocation. World Politics 30(1): 5886.
McKinlay R. D. and Little R. (1978) A Foreign-Policy Model of the Distribution of British Bilateral Aid, 1960–70. British Journal of Political Science 8(3): 313331.
McKinlay R. D. and Little R. (1979) The US Aid Relationship: A Test of the Recipient Need and the Donor Interest Model. Political Studies 27(2): 236250.
Meernik J., Krueger E. L. and Poe S. C. (1998) Testing Models of U.S. Foreign Policy: Foreign Aid during and After the Cold War. The Journal of Politics 60(1): 6385.
Nelson T. (2012) Determinants of Disaster Aid: Donor Interest or Recipient Need? Global Change, Peace & Security 24(1): 109126.
Nohrstedt D. (2008) The Politics of Crisis Policymaking: Chernobyl and Swedish Nuclear Energy Policy. Policy Studies Journal 36(2): 257278.
Nohrstedt D. and Weible C. M. (2010) The Logic of Policy Change After Crisis: Proximity and Subsystem Interaction. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy 1(2): 132.
Papke L. E. and Wooldridge J. M. (1996) Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics 11(6): 619632.
Peterson J., Byrne A. and Helwig N. (2012) International Interests: The Common Foreign and Security Policy. In Peterson J. and Shackleton M. (eds.), The Institutions of the European Union, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 288314.
Princen S. (2011) Agenda-Setting Strategies in EU Policy Processes. Journal of European Public Policy 18(7): 927943.
Princen S. (2012) Agenda-Setting and the Formation of an EU Policy-Making State. In Richardson J. (ed.), Constructing a Policy-Making State?: Policy Dynamics in the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2945.
Seeberg P. (2015) The EU and the Syrian Crisis: The Use of Sanctions and the Regime's Strategy for Survival. Mediterranean Politics 20(1): 1835.
Soetendorp B. (1999) Foreign Policy in the European Union: Theory, History and Practice Vol. 19. London: Longman.
Stone D. (2002) Policy Paradox. The Art of Political Decision Making, 2nd ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Stone D. A. (1989) Causal Stories and the Formation of Policy Agendas. Political Science Quarterly 104(2): 281300.
Tilly C. (2008) Credit and Blame. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Van Assche T. (2012) When do New Issues Appear? Punctuations in the Belgian Executive Agenda. Acta Politica 47(2): 128150.
Van Belle D. A. (2000) New York Times and Network TV News Coverage of Foreign Disasters: The Significance of the Insignificant Variables. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 77(1): 5070.
Van Belle D. A., Rioux J. and Potter D. M. (2004) Media, Bureaucracies, and Foreign Aid: A Comparative Analysis of United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, France and Japan. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Walgrave S. and Varone F. (2008) Punctuated Equilibrium and Agenda-Setting: Bringing Parties Back in: Policy Change After the Dutroux Crisis in Belgium. Governance 21(3): 365395.
Werts J. (1992) The European Council. Amsterdam: North Holland Elsevier Science Publishers B.V.
Werts J. (2008) The European Council. London: John Harper Publishing.
Wessels W. (2008) The European Council: A Bigger Club, a Similar Role?. In Best E., Christiansen T. and Settembri P. (eds.), The Institutions of the Enlarged European Union: Continuity and Change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 1633.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 94 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 231 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.