Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Windows of opportunity: legislative fragmentation conditions the effect of partisanship on product market deregulation

  • Michael G. Smith (a1) and Johannes Urpelainen (a2)
Abstract

Previous research on deregulation in industrialised countries emphasises differences between left-wing and right-wing parties, but data on product market regulation (PMR) indicate that these differences have been modest. If partisan preferences on the merits of deregulation differ sharply, why such modest differences? We argue that partisan differences only become pronounced when the government is strong and rules a relatively unified legislature. Thus, legislative fragmentation should reduce the left-right difference in PMR. We test this theory against PMR data in 29 industrialised countries, 1978–2007. We find that right-wing governments only have a strong negative effect on regulation if the legislature and the government are not fragmented.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alesina, A. and Drazen, A. (1991) Why are Stabilizations Delayed? American Economic Review 81(5): 11701188.
Beck, N. and Katz, J. N. (1995) What to Do (and Not to Do) with Time-Series Cross-Section Data. American Political Science Review 89(3): 634647.
Beck, N. and Katz, J. N. (2011) Modeling Dynamics in Time-Series-Cross-Section Political Economy Data. Annual Review of Political Science 14: 331352.
Becker, G. S. (1983) A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(3): 371400.
Belloc, F. and Nicita, A. (2011) Liberalization-Privatization Paths: Policies and Politics, Working Paper No. 609, Department of Economics at University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Benoit, K. and Laver, M. (2006) Party Policy in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
Boehmke, F. J. (2008) Grinter: A Stata Utility for Graphing the Marginal Effect of an Interacted Variable in Regression Models. Retrieved 21 June 2011 from http://myweb.uiowa.edu/fboehmke/methods.html.
Boix, C. (2000) Partisan Governments, the International Economy, and Macroeconomic Policies in Advanced Nations, 1960–93. World Politics 53(1): 3873.
Bolick, C. (1995) Thatcher’s Revolution: Deregulation and Political Transformation. Yale Journal on Regulation 12(1): 526548.
Brambor, T., Clark, W. R. and Golder, M. (2006) Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses. Political Analysis 14(1): 6382.
Campbell, R. M. (2002) The Politics of Postal Transformation: Modernizing Postal Systems in the Electronic and Global World. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Chang, C. P. and Berdiev, A. N. (2011) The Political Economy of Energy Regulation in OECD Countries. Energy Economics 33(5): 816825.
Cioffi, J. W. and Höpner, M. (2006) The Political Paradox of Finance Capitalism: Interests, Preferences, and Center-Left Party Politics in Corporate Governance Reform. Politics and Society 34(4): 463502.
de Boef, S. and Keele, L. (2008) Taking Time Seriously. American Journal of Political Science 52(1): 184200.
Driscoll, J. and Kraay, A. (1998) Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimation with Spatially-Dependent Panel Data. Review of Economics and Statistics 80(4): 549560.
Eising, R. (2002) Policy Learning in Embedded Negotiations: Explaining EU Electricity Liberalization. International Organization 56(1): 85120.
Evans, B. (1999) Thatcherism and British Politics: 1975–1999. Shroud, Gloucestershire: Sutton Publishing.
Fleming, M. and Button, K. (1989) Regulatory Reform in the UK. In Button K. and Swann D. (eds), The Age of Regulatory Reform. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 79103.
Frye, T. (2002) The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Postcommunist World. World Politics 54(3): 308336.
Garrett, G. (1998) Partisan Politics in the Global Economy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Gehlbach, S. and Malesky, E. J. (2010) The Contribution of Veto Players to Economic Reform. Journal of Politics 72(4): 957975.
Grzymala-Busse, A. (2003) Political Competition and the Politicization of the State in East Central Europe. Comparative Political Studies 36(10): 11231146.
Hallerberg, M. and Basinger, S. J. (1998) Internationalization and Changes in Tax Policy in OECD Countries: The Importance of Domestic Veto Players. Comparative Political Studies 31(3): 321353.
Hammond, T. H. and Butler, C. K. (2003) Some Complex Answers to the Simple Question Do Institutions Matter?’ Policy Choice and Policy Change in Presidential and Parliamentary Systems. Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(2): 145200.
Hammond, T. H. and Knott, J. H. (1988) The Deregulatory Snowball: Explaining Deregulation in the Financial Industry. Journal of Politics 50(1): 330.
Henisz, W. J. (2000) The Institutional Environment for Economic Growth. Economics and Politics 12(1): 131.
Henisz, W. J., Zelner, B. A. and Guillen, M. F. (2005) The Worldwide Diffusion of Market-Oriented Infrastructure Reform, 1977–1999. American Sociological Review 70(6): 871897.
Hirsh, R. F. (1999) Power Loss: The Origins of Deregulation and Restructuring in the American Electric Utility System. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Høj, J., Galasso, V., Nicoletti, G. and Dang, T.-T. (2006) The Political Economy of Structural Reform: Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries, Working Paper No. 501, OECD Economics Department.
Matthews, K. and Minford, P. (1987) Mrs. Thatcher’s Economic Policies 1979–1987. Economic Policy 2(5): 57101.
Meseguer, C. (2004) What Role for Learning? The Diffusion of Privatisation in OECD and Latin American Countries. Journal of Public Policy 24(3): 299325.
Murillo, M. V. and Martínez-Gallardo, C. (2007) Political Competition and Policy Adoption: Market Reforms in Latin American Public Utilities. American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 120139.
Nickell, S. (1981) Biases in Dynamic Model with Fixed Effects. Econometrica 49(6): 14171426.
Pitlik, H. (2007) A Race to Liberalization? Diffusion of Economic Policy Reform Among OECD-Economies. Public Choice 132(1–2): 159178.
Potrafke, N. (2009) Did Globalization Restrict Partisan Politics? An Empirical Evaluation of Social Expenditures in a Panel of OECD Countries. Public Choice 104(1–2): 105124.
Potrafke, N. (2010) Does Government Ideology Influence Deregulation of Product Markets? Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries. Public Choice 143(1–2): 135155.
Roubini, N. and Sachs, J. D. (1989) Political and Economic Determinants of Budget Deficits in the Industrial Democracies. European Economic Review 33(5): 903938.
Spiller, P. T. and Tommasi, M. (2003) The Institutional Foundations of Public Policy: A Transactions Approach with Application to Argentina. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19(2): 281306.
Tsebelis, G. (2002) Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Vogel, S. K. (1999) Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Volkens, A., Lehmann, P., Merz, N., Regel, S., Werner, A., Lacewell, O. P. and Schultze, H. (2013) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2013b. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Public Policy
  • ISSN: 0143-814X
  • EISSN: 1469-7815
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-public-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Smith and Urpelainen supplementary material
Appendix

 PDF (6.2 MB)
6.2 MB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed