Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55b6f6c457-ln9sz Total loading time: 0.232 Render date: 2021-09-24T16:22:30.302Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Stereotyped at Seven? Biases in Teacher Judgement of Pupils’ Ability and Attainment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

TAMMY CAMPBELL*
Affiliation:
Department of Quantitative Social Science, UCL Institute of Education, University of London email: tcampbell@ioe.ac.uk

Abstract

There is evidence that teacher judgements and assessments of primary school pupils can be systematically biased. This paper tests the proposal that stereotyping plays a part in creating these judgement inequalities and is instrumental in achievement variation according to income-level, gender, special educational needs status, ethnicity and spoken language. Using 2008 data for almost 5,000 pupils from the Millennium Cohort Study, it demonstrates biases in teachers’ average ratings of sample pupils’ reading and maths ‘ability and attainment’ which correspond to every one of these key characteristics. Findings go on to suggest that stereotypes according to each of income-level, gender, special educational needs status and ethnicity all play some part in forming these biases. The paper strengthens the evidence that stereotyping of pupils may contribute to assessment and thereby attainment inequalities, and concludes that an increased focus on tackling this process may lead to greater parity and a narrowing of gaps.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bew, P. (2011a), Review of Key Stage 2 Testing, Assessment and Accountability: Progress Report, London: Department for Education, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/180401/DFE-00035-2011.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Bew, P. (2011b), Review of Key Stage 2 Testing, Assessment and Accountability: Final Report, London: Department for Education, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/176180/Review-KS2-Testing_final-report.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Bradbury, A. (2011a), ‘Equity, ethnicity and the hidden dangers of “contextual” measures of school performance’, Race Ethnicity and Education, 14: 3, 277‒91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradbury, A. (2011b), ‘Rethinking assessment and inequality: the production of disparities in attainment in early years education’, Journal of Education Policy, 26: 5, 655‒76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brookhart, S. M. (2013), ‘The use of teacher judgement for summative assessment in the USA’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 20: 1, 69‒90.Google Scholar
Burgess, S. and Greaves, E. (2009), ‘Test scores, subjective assessment and stereotyping of ethnic minorities’, University of Bristol: Centre for Market and Public Organisation, http://www.bris.ac.uk/cmpo/publications/papers/2009/wp221.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Campbell, T. (2013), In-School Ability Grouping and the Month of Birth Effect: Preliminary Evidence from the Millennium Cohort Study, London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/shared/getfile.ashx?itemtype=document&id=1618 (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Centre for Longitudinal Studies (2011), Millennium Cohort Study: Fourth Survey, Teacher Survey, 2008, August 2011. SN: 6848, Institute of Education, University of London, http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6848-1.Google Scholar
Centre for Longitudinal Studies (2012), Millennium Cohort Study: Fourth Survey, 2008, 3rd edn, August 2012, SN: 6411, Institute of Education, University of London, http://dx.doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-6411-2.Google Scholar
Department for Children, Schools and Families (2008), 21st Century Schools: A World Class Education for Every Child, https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DCSF-01044-2008.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Department for Education (2010a), The Importance of Teaching: The Schools White Paper 2010, https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/CM-7980.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Department for Education (2010b), The Importance of Teaching: White Paper Equalities Impact Assessment, https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/CM-7980-Impact_equalities.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Department for Education (2011), National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 2 in England, 2010/2011 (revised), http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s001047/sfr31-2011.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Department for Education (2012a), Early Years Foundation Stage Profile Attainment by Pupil Characteristics, England 2011/12, http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s001098/sfr30-2012.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Department for Education (2012b), National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 2 in England, 2011/2012 (revised), http://www.education.gov.uk/rsgateway/DB/SFR/s001104/sfr33-2012v2.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Department for Education (2012c), Phonics Screening Check and National Curriculum Assessments at Key Stage 1 in England: 2012, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/21928/main_20text_20_20sfr21-2012.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Department for Education and Skills (2005), Higher Standards, Better Schools for all: More Choice for Parents and Pupils, https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/Cm%206677.pdf.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Earp, B. D. (2010), ‘Automaticity in the classroom: unconscious mental processes and the racial achievement gap’, Journal of Multiculturalism in Education, 6:1, 1‒22.Google Scholar
Eckert, T. L., Dunn, E. K., Codding, R. S., Begeny, J. C. and Kleinmann, A. E. (2006), ‘Assessment of mathematics and reading performance: an examination of the correspondence between direct assessment of student performance and teacher report’, Psychology in the Schools, 43: 3, 247‒65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, S. and Ireson, J. (1999), ‘Pedagogy in the secondary school’, in Mortimore, P. (ed.), Understanding Pedagogy and Its Impact on Learning, London: Chapman.Google Scholar
Hansen, K. (ed.) (2012), Millennium Cohort Study: First, Second, Third and Fourth Surveys ‒ A Guide to the Datasets, 7th edn, London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/shared/getfile.ashx?id=598&itemtype=document (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Hansen, K. and Jones, E. (2011), ‘Ethnicity and gender gaps in early childhood’, British Educational Research Journal, 37: 6, 973‒91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlen, W. (2004), A Systematic Review of the Evidence of the Impact on Students, Teachers and the Curriculum of the Process of Using Assessment by Teachers for Summative Purposes, London: EPPI-Centre, https://eppi.ioe.ac.uk/cms/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=Pbyl1CdsDJU%3D&tabid=108&mid=1003 (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Harlen, W. (2005), ‘Trusting teachers’ judgement: research evidence of the reliability and validity of teachers’ assessment used for summative purposes’, Research Papers in Education, 20: 3, 245‒70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harlen, W. (2007), The Quality of Learning: Assessment Alternatives for Primary Education, Primary Review Research Survey 3/4, Cambridge: University of Cambridge Faculty of Education.Google Scholar
Hilton, J. L. and von Hipple, W. (1996), ‘Stereotypes’, Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 237–71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maylor, U., Smart, S., Kuyok, K. A. and Ross, A. (2009), Black Children's Achievement Programme Evaluation, London: Department for Children, Schools and Families, http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/11380/1/DCSF-RR177.pdf (accessed 2 March 2015).Google Scholar
McGarty, C., Yzerbyt, V. Y. and Spears, R. (2002), Stereotypes as Explanations: The Formation of Meaningful Beliefs about Social Groups, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mostapha, T. (2013), Technical Report on Response in the Teacher Survey in MCS 4 (age 7), London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/shared/getfile.ashx?id=1749&itemtype=document (accessed 1 December 2013).Google Scholar
Plewis, I. (ed.) (2007), The Millennium Cohort Study: Technical Report on Sampling, 4th edn, London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies, http://www.cls.ioe.ac.uk/shared/get-file.ashx?id=409&itemtype=document (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Reeves, D. J., Boyle, W. F., and Christie, T. (2001), ‘The relationship between teacher assessments and pupil attainments in standard test tasks at Key Stage 2, 1996‒98’, British Educational Research Journal, 27: 2, 141‒60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, J. P. and Lubienski, S. T. (2011), ‘The development of gender achievement gaps in mathematics and reading during elementary and middle school: examining direct cognitive assessments and teacher ratings’, American Educational Research Journal, 48: 2, 268302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strand, S., de Coulon, A., Meschi, E., Vorhouse, J., Frumkin, L., Ivins, C., Small, L., Sood, A., Gervais, M. C. and Rehman, H. (2010), Drivers and Challenges in Raising the Achievement of Pupils from Bangladeshi, Somali and Turkish Backgrounds, London: Department for Children, Schools and Families, https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eOrderingDownload/DCSF-RR226.pdf (accessed 13 October 2013).Google Scholar
Tikly, L., Haynes, J., Caballero, C., Hill, J. and Gillborn, D. (2008), Evaluation of Aiming High: African Caribbean Achievement Project, London: Department for Education and Skills, http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130401151715/https://www.education.gov.uk/publications/eorderingdownload/rr801.pdf (accessed 13.10.13).Google Scholar
Thomas, S., Smees, R., Madaus, G. F. and Raczek, A. E. (1998), ‘Comparing teacher assessment and standard task results in England: the relationship between pupil characteristics and attainment’, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 5: 2, 213‒46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyse, D., McCreery, E., and Torrance, H. (2008), ‘The trajectory and impact of national reform: curriculum and assessment in English primary education’, Primary Review Research Survey 3/2’, University of Cambridge Faculty of Education, Cambridge.Google Scholar
37
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Stereotyped at Seven? Biases in Teacher Judgement of Pupils’ Ability and Attainment
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Stereotyped at Seven? Biases in Teacher Judgement of Pupils’ Ability and Attainment
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Stereotyped at Seven? Biases in Teacher Judgement of Pupils’ Ability and Attainment
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *