Skip to main content Accessibility help

An End to Incrementalism? The Impact of Expenditure Restraint on Social Services Budgets 1979–1986*

  • Aidan Kelly (a1)

The theory of incrementalism is a long-standing and influential perspective on policy making and resource allocation in the public sector. Previous research on social services budgeting suggests that resources are allocated incrementally, although there has been some debate as to whether this would persist in an era of prolonged expenditure restraint. Incremental budgetary outcomes are operationalised as percentage changes in budgets pro-rata with percentage changes in the total budget, and as stable shares of total expenditure for each activity. Data for 99 English social service departments supports incrementalism in that budget shares change by only 1.8 per cent, but percentage allocations depart from pro-rata incrementalism by a mean of 74 per cent. The comparison of the two summary indices over time supports those who have argued that prolonged restraint would encourage non-incremental budgeting, but change in the agency's total budget does not consistently predict budgetary outcomes. The effect of restraint on incrementalism varies with the measure used and across the component activities of the measures, but there is enough evidence to suggest a significant decline in the level of incrementalism in social service departments. In particular, non-incremental budgeting is strongly associated with the growth of day centre expenditure on the mentally ill and the elderly before 1982–3, and after that with the pursuit of the ‘community care’ strategy within state provided services for the elderly and children. Incrementalism as a general theory of agency budgeting is limited in its ability to explain variations in the degree of incrementalism between agencies, between component budgets and over time. The conclusion suggests that further research should seek explanations for these variations in the varying balance of the competing forces which shape outcomes in welfare bureaucracies and in the relationship between these forces and the organisation's environment.

Hide All
Audit Commission (1985), Managing Social Services for the Elderly More Effectively. HMSO. London.
Audit Commission (1986), Making a Reality of Community Care, HMSO, London.
Booth, T. (ed.) (1979), Planning for Welfare, Heineman, London.
Braybrooke, D. and Lindblom, C. (1977), The Strategy of Decision: Policy Evaluation as a Social Process, Free Press, New York.
CIPFA (1979, 1983, 1986). Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy, Personal Social Services Actuals, CIPFA, London.
Danziger, J.N. (1976), ‘Assessing incrementalism in British municipal budgeting’. British Journal of Political Science, 6, 335350.
Day, P. and Klein, R. (1987), ‘Residential care for the elderly: a billion-pound experiment in policymaking’. Public Money, March. 1924.
Dearlove, J. (1983), The Politics of Policy in Local Government, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Dcmpster, M.A.H. and Wildavsky, A. (1979), ‘On change: or there is no magic size for an increment’. Political Studies, 27, 371389.
Elcock, H. and Jordan, G. (1987), Learning from Local Authority Budgeling, Gower, Aldershot.
Ferlie, E. and Judge, K. (1981), ‘Retrenchment and rationality in the personal social services’. Policy and Politics, 14: 4, 475490.
Glennerster, H. (1981), ‘Social service spending in a hostile environment’ in Hood, C. and Wright, M. (eds), Big Government in Hard Times, Martin Robertson, London.
Glennerster, H., Korman, N. and Marslen-Wilson, F. (1983), Planning for Priority Groups. Martin Robertson, London.
Goldberg, M. and Connelly, N. (1982), The Effectiveness of Social Care for the Elderly. Heineman Educational Books, London.
Greenwood, R. (1979), ‘The local authority budgetary process’ in Booth, T. (ed.) Planning for Welfare, Heineman, London.
Greenwood, R. (1983), ‘Changing patterns of budgeting in English local government’. Public Administration, 61, 149168.
Greenwood, R. (1984), ‘Incremental budgeting: antecedents of change’. Journal of Public Policy, 4, 277306.
Heclo, H. and Wildavsky, A. (1974), The Private Government of Public Money, Macmillan, London.
Hood, C. and Wright, M. (1981), ‘From decrementalism to quantum cuts?’ in Hood, C. and Wright, M. (eds). Big Government in Hard Times, Martin Robertson, London.
Howe, D. (1986), Social Workers and their Practice in Welfare Bureaucracies, Gower, Aldershot.
HMSO (1987), United Kingdom National Accounts (The CSO Blue Book). HMSO. London.
Judge, K. (1978), Rationing Social Services, Heineman, London.
Klein, R. and O'Higgins, M. (1985), ‘Social Policy after incrementalism’ in The Future of Welfare, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
Lindblom, C. (1979), ‘Still muddling, not yet through’. Public Administration Review, 39, 517–26.
March, J. and Simon, H. (1958), Organisations, Wiley, New York.
Minogue, M. (1983), ‘Theory and practice in public policy and administration’, Policy and Politics, 11: 1, 6385.
Natchez, P.B. and Bupp, I.C. (1983), ‘Policy and priority in the budgetary process’, American Political Science Review, 67, 951963.
Quinn, J.B. (1978), ‘Strategic change: logical incrementalism’. Sloan Management Review, Fall, 719.
Schick, A. (1983), ‘Incremental budgeting in a decremental age’. Policy Sciences, 16, 125.
Stewart, J. (1980), ‘From growth to standstill’, in Wright, M. (ed.), Public Spending Decisions: Growth and Restraint in the 1970s, Allen and Unwin. London.
Webb, A. (1979), ‘Policy making in social services departments’. in Booth, T. (ed.), Planning for Welfare, Heineman, London.
Webb, A. and Wistow, G. (1983a), ‘Public expenditure and policy implementation: the case of community care’. Public Administration, 61, 2141.
Webb, A. and Wistow, G. (1983b), ‘The personal social services: incrementalism, expediency. or systematic social planning’, in Loney, M. et al. (eds), Social Policy and Social Welfare, Open University Press. Milton Keynes.
Webb, A. and Wistow, G. (1986), Planning, Need and Scarcity, Allen and Unwin. London.
Wildavsky, A. (1964), The Politics of the Budgetary Process, Little, Brown and Co., Boston.
Wildavsky, A. (1975), Budgeting: A Comparative Theory of the Budgetary Process. Little, Brown and Co., Boston.
Wildavsky, A. (1978), ‘A budget for all seasons? Why the traditional budget lasts’. Public Administration Review, 38, 501509.
Wolman, H. (1986), ‘Innovation in local government and fiscal austerity’, Journal of Public Policy, 6: 2, 159–83.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed