Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Beyond Welfare Chauvinism and Deservingness. Rationales of Belonging as a Conceptual Framework for the Politics and Governance of Migrants’ Rights

  • EMMA CARMEL (a1) and BOŻENA SOJKA (a2)

Abstract

This article argues that the politics and governance of migrants’ rights needs to be reframed. In particular, the terms “welfare chauvinism”, and deservingness should be replaced. Using a qualitative transnational case study of policymakers in Poland and the UK, we develop an alternative approach. In fine-grained and small-scale interpretive analysis, we tease out four distinct “rationales of belonging” that mark out the terms and practices of social membership, as well as relative positions of privilege and subordination. These rationales of belonging are: temporal-territorial, ethno-cultural, labourist, and welfareist. Importantly, these rationales are knitted together by different framings of the transnational contexts, within which the politics and governance of migration and social protection are given meaning. The rationales of belonging do not exist in isolation, but, in each country, they qualify each other in ways that imply different politics and governance of migrants’ rights. Taken together, these rationales of belonging generate transnational projects of social exclusion, as well as justifications for migrant inclusion stratified by class, gender and ethnicity.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Amelina, A. (2016), Transnationalizing Inequalities in Europe. Sociocultural Boundaries, Assemblages and Regimes of Intersection, London: Routledge.
Amelina, A. (2019), ‘Theorising European Social Citizenship. Governance, discourses and experiences of transnational social security,’ in: Amelina, A., Carmel, E., Runfors, A., and Scheibelhofer, E. (eds), The Boundaries of European Social Citizenship, London: Routledge.
Amelina, A. and Lutz, H. (2019), Gender and Migration Transnational and Intersectional Prospects, London: Routledge.
Amelina, A., Carmel, E., Runfors, A. and Scheibelhofer, E. (2019), (eds), The Boundaries of European Social Citizenship, London: Routledge.
Andersen, J.G. and Bjørklund, T. (1990), ‘Structural Changes and New Cleavages: The Progress Parties in Denmark and Norway,’ Acta Sociologica, 33, 1, 195217
Anderson, B. (1991), Imagined communities: reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism, London: Verso.
Anderson, B. (2013), Us and Them? The dangerous politics of immigration control, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anthias, F. and Yuval-Davis, N. (1989), (eds), Woman-nation-state, London: Macmillan.
Anthias, F. and Yuval-Davis, N. (2005), Racialized boundaries: Race, nation, gender, colour and class and the anti-racist struggle, London: Routledge.
Ataç, I. and Rosenberger, S. (2019), ‘Social Policies as a Tool of Migration Control,’ Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 17, 1, 110.
Bauman, Z. (2011), ‘Migration and identities in the globalized world,’ Philosophy & Social Criticism, 37, 4, 425435.
Bhambra, G. K. (2017), ‘The current crisis of Europe: Refugees, colonialism, and the limits of cosmopolitanism,’ European Law Journal, 23, 5, 395405.
Bruzelius, C. (2019), ‘Freedom of movement, social rights and residence-based conditionality in the European Union,’ Journal of European Social Policy, 29, 1, 7083.
Bryman, A. (2016), Social research methods, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cerami, A. and Carmel, E. (2011), ‘Governing migration and welfare: institutions and emotions in the production of differential integration,’ in: Carmel, E., Cerami, A., and Papadopoulos, T., T. (eds), Migration and Welfare in the New Europe: Social protection and the challenges of integration, Bristol: Policy Press, 122.
Carmel, E. (1999), ‘Concepts, Context and Discourse in a Comparative Case Study,’ International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 2, 2, 141–50.
Carmel, E. (2019), ‘Regimes of governing practices, socio-political order and contestation,’ in: Carmel, E., (ed), Governance Analysis. Critical enquiry at the intersection of policy, politics and society, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2446.
Carmel, E. and Paul, R. (2013), ‘Complex stratification: Understanding European Union governance of migrant rights,’ Regions and Cohesion, 3, 3, 5685.
Carmel, E. and Sojka, B. (2018), ‘Social Security and the ‘Management of Migration’,’ in: Millar, J., and Sainsbury, R., R. (eds), Understanding Social Security (3rd ed.), Bristol: Policy Press, 119134.
Carmel, E., Sojka, B. and Papież, K. (2019), ‘Beyond the rights-bearing mobile EU citizen: governing inequality and privilege in European Union social security,’ in: Amelina, A., Carmel, E., Runfors, A., and Scheibelhofer, E., (eds), The Boundaries of European Social Citizenship, London: Routledge, 4672.
Clarke, J. (2005), ‘New Labour’s Citizens: Activated, Empowered, Responsibilized, Abandoned?,’ Critical Social Policy, 25, 4, 447463.
Clarke, J., Bainton, D., Lendvai, N. and Stubbs, P. (2015), Making Policy Move. Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage, Bristol: Policy Press.
De Genova, N. (2018), ‘The "migrant crisis" as racial crisis: Do Black Lives Matter in Europe?,’ Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41, 10, 17651782.
Ennser-Jedenastik, L. (2017), ‘Welfare Chauvinism in Populist Radical Right Platforms: The Role of Redistributive Justice Principles,’ Social Policy & Administration, 52, 1, 293314.
Faist, T. (2000), ‘Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture,’ Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23, 2, 189222.
Faist, T. (2009), ‘The Transnational Social Question: Social Rights and Citizenship in a Global Context,’ International Sociology, 24, 1, 735.
Faist, T. (2014), ‘On the transnational social question: How social inequalities are reproduced in Europe,’ Journal of European Social Policy, 24, 3, 207222.
Geiger, B. B. (2018), ‘Benefit ‘Myths’? The Accuracy and Inaccuracy of Public Beliefs about the Benefits System,’ Social Policy & Administration, 52, 5, 9981018.
Gellner, E. (2006 [1983]), Nations and Nationalism, 2nd edition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Glick Schiller, N., Basch, L. and Blanc-Szanton, C. (1992), ‘Transnationalism: A new analytic framework for understanding migration,’ Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 645, 1, 124.
Greve, B. (2011), ‘Labour migration and labour market integration: causes and challenges,’ in: Carmel, E., Cerami, A. and Papadopoulos, T., (eds), Migration and welfare in the new Europe: social protection and the challenges of integration, Bristol: Policy Press.
Greve, B. (2019), Welfare, Populism, and Welfare Chauvinism, Bristol: Policy Press.
Griffiths, M., Rogers, A. and Anderson, B. (2013), ‘Migration, time and temporalities: Review and prospect,’ COMPAS Research Resources Paper, 199217.
Guibernau, M. (1996), Nationalisms: the nation-state and nationalism in the twentieth century, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Guibernau, M. (2007), The identity of nations, Cambridge: Polity.
Hansen, P. and Jonsson, S. (2014), Eurafrica: The untold history of European integration and colonialism, Bloomsbury Publishing.
Heindlmaier, A. and Blauberger, M. (2017), ‘Enter at Your Own Risk: Free Movement of EU Citizens in Practice,’ West European Politics, 40, 6, 11981217.
Jensen, C. and Petersen, M. (2017), ‘The Deservingness Heuristic and the Politics of Health Care,’ American Journal of Political Science, 61, 1 68-83.
Jørgensen, M. B. and Thomsen, T. L. (2016), ‘Deservingness in the Danish context: Welfare chauvinism in times of crisis,’ Critical Social Policy, 36, 3, 330351.
Keskinen, S. (2016), ‘From welfare nationalism to welfare chauvinism: Economic rhetoric, the welfare state and changing asylum policies in Finland,’ Critical Social Policy, 36, 3, 352370.
Kofman, E. (2013), ‘Gendered labour migrations in Europe and emblematic migratory figures,’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39, 4, 579600.
Koopmans, R. (2010), ‘Trade-offs between equality and difference: Immigrant integration, multiculturalism and the welfare state in cross-national perspective,’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 1, 126.
Koostra, A. (2016), ‘Deserving and Undeserving Welfare Claimants in Britain and the Netherlands: Examining the role of ethnicity and migration status using a vignette experiment,’ European Sociological Review, 32, 3, 323–38.
Kremer, M. (2016), ‘Earned Citizenship: Labour Migrants’ Views on the Welfare State,’ Journal of Social Policy, 45, 3, 395415.
Lavie, S. and Swedenburg, T. (1996), ‘Between and among the boundaries of culture: Bridging text and lived experience in the third timespace,’ Cultural Studies, 10, 1, 154179.
Mayblin, L. (2016), ‘Complexity reduction and policy consensus: Asylum seekers, the right to work, and the ‘pull factor’ thesis in the UK context,’ The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18, 4, 812828.
Mayblin, L. (2019), Impoverishment and asylum: social policy and slow violence, Routledge.
Mewes, J. and Mau, S. (2013), ‘Globalization, socio-economic status and welfare chauvinism: European perspectives on attitudes toward the exclusion of immigrants,’ International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 54, 3, 228245.
O’Brien, C. (2016), ‘Civis capitalist sum: Class as the new guiding principle of EU free movement rights,’ Common Market Law Review, 53, 4, 937977.
Osipovič, D. (2015), ‘Conceptualisations of Welfare Deservingness by Polish Migrants in the UK,’ Journal of Social Policy, 44, 4, 729–46.
Özkirimli, U. (2010), Theories of nationalism: a critical introduction, 2nd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Paul, R. (2013), ‘Strategic Contextualisation: Free Movement, Labour Migration Policies and the Governance of Foreign Workers in Europe,’ Policy Studies, 34, 2, 122141.
Paul, R. (2015), The Political Economy of Border-Drawing: Arranging Legality in European Labor Migration Policies, Oxford: Berghahn.
Runfors, A. and Fröhlig, F. (2019), ‘Discourses of Belonging in the Context of EU Enlargements: A Comparative Analysis of Policy Discourses Specifying EU Welfare Access,’ in: Amelina, A., Carmel, E., Runfors, A., and Scheibelhofer, E., (eds), The Boundaries of European Social Citizenship, London: Routledge, 7390.
Sainsbury, D. (2012), Welfare States and Immigrant Rights: The Politics of Inclusion and Exclusion, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Shaw, J. and Miller, N. (2013), ‘When Legal Worlds Collide: An Exploration of What Happens When EU Free Movement Law Meets UK Immigration Law’, European Law Review, 38, 2, 137166.
Shutes, I. and Walker, S., (2018), ‘Gender and free movement: EU migrant women’s access to residence and social rights in the UK,’ Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44, 1, 137153.
Schneider, A. L. and Ingram, H. M. (2005), Deserving and entitled: social constructions and public policy, Albany, State University of New York.
Sojka, B. and Saar, M. (2020), ‘Returnees: Unwanted Citizens or Cherished Countrymen,’Social Policy Review, Bristol: Policy Press.
Soysal, Y.N. (2012), ‘Citizenship, Immigration, and the European Social Project: Rights and Obligations of Individuality,’ British Journal of Sociology, 63, 121.
van Oorschot, W., Roosma, F., Meuleman, B. and Reeskens, T. (2017), (eds), The social legitimacy of targeted welfare: Attitudes to welfare deservingness, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Yuval-Davis, N. (1996), ‘Women and the biological reproduction of “the nation”,’ Women’s studies international forum, 19, 1-2, 1724.
Yuval-Davis, N. (1997), ‘Women, citizenship and difference,’ Feminist review, 57, 1, 427.
Yuval-Davis, N. (2011), The politics of belonging: Intersectional contestations, London: Sage.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

CARMEL and SOJKA Supplementary Materials
CARMEL and SOJKA Supplementary Materials 1

 Word (53 KB)
53 KB
WORD
Supplementary materials

CARMEL and SOJKA Supplementary Materials
CARMEL and SOJKA Supplementary Materials 2

 Word (24 KB)
24 KB

Beyond Welfare Chauvinism and Deservingness. Rationales of Belonging as a Conceptual Framework for the Politics and Governance of Migrants’ Rights

  • EMMA CARMEL (a1) and BOŻENA SOJKA (a2)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.