Skip to main content
×
Home

Building the Eco-social State: Do Welfare Regimes Matter?

  • MAX KOCH (a1) and MARTIN FRITZ (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Authors such as Dryzek, Gough and Meadowcroft have indicated that social-democratic welfare states could be in a better position to deal with development of the ‘green’ or ‘eco’ state, and the intersection of social and environmental policies, than conservative or liberal welfare regimes (synergy hypothesis). However, this hypothesis has as yet not been examined in comparative empirical research. Based on comparative empirical data from EUROSTAT, the World Bank, the OECD, the Global Footprint Network and the International Social Survey Programme, we are carrying out two research operations: First, by applying correspondence analysis, we contrast the macro-structural welfare and sustainability indicators of thirty countries and ask whether clusters largely follow the synergy hypothesis. Second, we raise the issue of whether differences in the institutional and organisational capabilities of combining welfare with environmental policies are reflected in people's attitudes and opinions. With regard to the first issue, our results suggest that there is no ‘automatic’ development of the ecostate based on already existing advanced welfare institutions. Representatives of all welfare regimes are spread across established, deadlocked, failing, emerging and endangered ecostates. As for the second issue, the results are mixed. While responses to the statements ‘economic growth always harms the environment’ and ‘governments should pass laws to make ordinary people protect the environment, even if it interferes with people's rights to make their own decisions’ did not vary according to welfare regimes, people from social-democratic countries expressed more often than average their willingness to accept cuts in their standard of living in order to protect the environment.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Arts W. and Gelissen J. (2002), ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12: 2, 137–58.
Blasius J. and Graeff P. (2009), ‘Economic freedom, wealth and corruption: analyzing their empirical connection by means of correspondence analysis’, in Graeff P. and Mehlkop G. (eds.), Capitalism, Democracy and the Prevention of War and Poverty, London: Routledge.
Blasius J. and Greenacre M. (2006), ‘Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods in practice’, in Greenacre M. and Blasius J. (eds.), Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
Borucke M., Moore D., Cranston G., Gracey K., Iha K., Larson J., Lazarus E., Morales J. C., Wackernagel M. and Galli A. (2013), ‘Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: the National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework’, Ecological Indicators, 24: 518–33.
Bourdieu P. (1984), Distinction: A Social Critque of the Judgement of Taste, Harvard: Harvard University Press.
Büchs M., Bardsley N. and Duwe S. (2012), ‘Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies’, Critical Social Policy, 31: 2, 285307.
Christoff P. and Eckersley R. (2011), ‘Comparing state responses’, in Dryzek J., Norgaard R. and Schlosberg D. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Daly H. and Farley J. (2009), Ecological Economics: Principles and Applications, Washington, DC: Island Press.
Dryzek J., Downes D., Hunhold C., Schlosberg D. and Hernes H. (2003), Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Norway, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dryzek J. S. (2008), ‘The ecological crisis of the welfare state’, in Gough I., Meadowcroft J., Dryzek J., Gerhards J., Lengfield H., Markandya A. and Ortiz R. (eds.), JESP symposium: climate change and social policy', Journal of European Social Policy, 18: 325.
Esping-Andersen G. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
EUROSTAT (2013), Online statistical databases at http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu (accessed between 8 and 12 of April 2013).
Evans A. (2014), ‘International Social Survey Programme: Environment III – ISSP 2010 (Australia)’, GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, ZA5512 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.11791.
Ferragina E. and Seelaib-Kaiser M. (2011) ‘Thematic review: welfare regime debate − past, present, futures?’, Policy and Politics, 39: 4, 583611.
Ferrara M. (1996) ‘The “Southern” model of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6: 1, 1737.
Fitzpatrick T. (2011), Understanding the Environment and Social Policy, Bristol: Policy Press.
Ganzeboom H. (2014), ‘International Social Survey Programme: Environment III – ISSP 2010 (Netherlands)’, GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, ZA5513 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.11792.
Global Footprint Network (2014), ‘Country trend figures’, www.footprintnetwork.org (accessed between 16 and 17 January 2014).
Goodman R. and Peng I. (1996) ‘The East Asian welfare states: peripatetic learning, adaptive changes, and nation building’, in Esping-Andersen G. (ed.), Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies, London: Sage.
Görg C. (2003), Regulation der Naturverhältnisse: Zu einer kritischen Theorie der ökologischen Krise, Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
Gough I. (2010), ‘Economic crisis, climate change and the future of welfare states’, 21st Century Society, 5: 1, 5164.
Gough I. (2013), ‘Carbon mitigation policies, distributional dilemmas and social policies’, Journal of Social Policy, 42: 2, 191213.
Gough I., Meadowcroft J., Dryzek J., Gerhards J., Lengfield H., Markandya A. and Ortiz R. (2008), ‘JESP symposium: climate change and social policy’, Journal of European Social Policy, 18: 4, 325–44.
Gough I. and Meadowcroft J. (2011), ‘Decarbonising the welfare state’, in Dryzek J., Norgaard R. and Schlosberg D. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Greenacre M. (2007), Correspondence Analysis in Practice, 2nd edn, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.
Holliday and Wilding (eds) (2003), Welfare Capitalism in East Asia: Social Policy in the Tiger Economics, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
ISSP Research Group (2012), ‘International Social Survey Programme: Environment III – ISSP 2010’, GESIS Dataarchive, Cologne. ZA5500 Datafile Version 2.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.11418.
Jackson T. (2009), Prosperity Without Growth? Economics for a Future Planet, London: Earthscan.
Jacobs M. (2012), ‘Green growth: economic theory and political discourse’, Working Paper No. 108, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, London.
Jones C. (1993), ‘The Pacific challenge: Confucian welfare states’, in Jones C. (ed.), New Perspectives on the Welfare State in Europe, London: Routledge.
Koch M. (2012), Capitalism and Climate Change: Theoretical Analysis, Historical Development and Policy Responses, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Koch M. (2013), ‘Welfare after growth: theoretical discussion and policy implications’, International Journal of Social Quality, 3: 1, 420.
Koch M. (2014), ‘Climate change, carbon trading and societal self-defence’, Real-World Economics Review, No. 67: 52–66.
Liefferink D., Arts B., Kamstra J. and Ooijevaar J. (2009), ‘Leaders and laggards in environmental policy: a quantitative analysis of domestic policy inputs’, Journal of European Public Policies, 16: 5, 677700.
Meadowcroft J. (2005), ‘From welfare state to ecostate’, in Barry J. and Eckersley R. (eds.), The State and the Global Ecologicl Crisis, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Meadowcroft J. (2008), ‘From welfare state to environmental state?’, in Gough I., Meadowcroft J., Dryzek J., Gerhards J., Lengfield H., Markandya A. and Ortiz R. (eds.), JESP symposium: climate change and social policy', Journal of European Social Policy, 18: 331.
OECD (2014), OECD.StatExtracts and indicators on green growth, http://stats.oecd.org/ (accessed between 13 and 15 January 2014).
Pye S., Skinner I., Meyer-Ohlendorf N., Leipprand A., Lucas K. and Salmons R. (2008), Addressing the Social Dimensions of Environmental Policy, Unit E1 – Social and Demographic Analysis, DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities, Brussels: European Commission.
Scruggs L. E. (1999), ‘Institutions and environmental performance in seventeen Western democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 29: 1, 131.
Sung S. and Pascall G. (2014) ‘Introduction: gender and welfare states in East Asia’, in Sung S. and Pascall G. (eds.), Gender and Welfare States in East Asia: Confucianism or Gender Equality? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Vala J. and Ramos A. (2014), ‘International Social Survey Programme: Environment III – ISSP 2010 (Portugal)’, GESIS Data Archive, Cologne, ZA5516 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.11793.
Victor P. A. (2008), Managing without Growth: Slower by Design, not Disaster, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Walker G. (2012), Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence and Politics, London: Routledge.
Wilkinson R. and Pickett K. (2010), The Spirit Level: Why Equality is Better for Everyone, London: Penguin.
WWF (2012), Living Planet Report 2012, Gland, Switzerland: WWF International.
The World Bank (2014), ‘World development indicators’, available online at http://data.worldbank.org/ (accessed on 13 January 2014).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 146 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 462 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.