Skip to main content

Choice and Welfare Reform: Lone Parents’ Decision Making around Paid Work and Family Life


Welfare-to-work policy in the UK sees ‘choice’ regarding lone parents’ employment decisions increasingly defined in terms of powers of selection between options within active labour market programmes, with constraints on the option of non-market activity progressively tightened. In this paper, we examine the wider choice agenda in public services in relation to lone-parent employment, focusing on the period following the 2007 Freud Review of welfare provision. (Freud, 2007) Survey data are used to estimate the extent to which recent policies promoting compulsory job search by youngest dependent child age map onto lone parents' own stated decision-making regarding if and when to enter the labour market. The findings indicate a substantial proportion of lone parents targeted by policy reform currently do not want a job and that their main reported reason is that they are looking after their children. Economically inactive lone mothers also remain more likely to have other chronic employment barriers, which traverse dependent child age categories. Some problems, such as poor health, sickness or disability, are particularly acute among those with older dependent children who are the target of recent activation policy.

Corresponding author
Hide All
Bell, A., Finch, N., La Velle, I., Sainsbury, R. and Skinner, C. (2005), A Question of Balance: Lone Parents, Childcare and Work, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 230, Leeds: HSMO Corporate Document Services.
Benzeval, M. (1998), ‘The self reported health status of lone parents’, Social Science and Medicine, 46: 10, 1337–53.
Blair, T. (2002), Speech by the Prime Minister on Welfare Reform – Jobcentre Plus, Streatham, 10 June,, downloaded 20/02/09.
Brown, G. (2007), Presentation by the Chancellor of the Exchequer at the Public Service Reform Conference, 21st Century Public Services – Learning from front line, 27 March,, downloaded 19/02/09.
Burchardt, T. and Le Grand, J. (2002), Constraint and Opportunity: Identifying Voluntary Non-Employment, CASE Working Paper No. 55, London: LSE.
Clarke, J. (2005), ‘New Labour's citizen's: activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned?’, Critical Social Policy, 25: 4, 447–63.
Clarke, J.Newman, J. and Westmarland, L. (2007), ‘The antagonisms of choice: New Labour and the reform of public services’, Social Policy and Society, 7: 2, 245–53.
Convery, P. (2009), ‘Welfare to work: from special measures to 80 percent employment’, Local Economy, 24: 1, 127.
Crompton, R. (1998), ‘Explaining women's employment patterns’, British Journal of Sociology, 49: 1, 118–36.
Dale, A., Lindley, J., Dex, S. and Rafferty, A. (2008), ‘Ethnic differences in women's labour market activity’, in Scott, J. et al. (eds.), Women and Employment: Changing Lives and New Challenges, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 81109.
Dean, H. (2007), ‘Tipping the balance: the problematic nature of work–life balance in a low income neighbourhood’, Journal of Social Policy, 36: 4, 519–37.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2006), A New Deal for Welfare: Empowering People to Work, Cm 6730, Leeds: Corporate Document Services,, downloaded 05/02/10.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2007), In Work, Better Off: Next Steps to Full Employment, CM 7130, Department for Work and Pensions, HMSO,, downloaded 25/01/11.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2008a), No One Written Off: Reforming Welfare to Reward Responsibility, Cm 7363, Leeds: Corporate Document Services,, downloaded 29/07/09.
Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) (2008b), Raising Expectations and Increasing Support: Reforming Welfare for the Future, Cm 7506, Leeds: Corporate Document Services,, downloaded 29/07/09.
Duncan, S. and Edwards, R. (1999), Lone Mothers, Paid-work and Gendered Moral Rationalities, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Duncan, S. and Irwin, S. (2004), ‘The social patterning of values and rationalities: mothers’ choices in combining caring and employment’, Social Policy and Society, 3: 4, 391–9.
Duncan-Smith, I. (2010), ‘Welfare for the 21st century’, speech by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Thursday 27 May,, downloaded 04/10/10.
Dwyer, P. (2004), ‘Creeping conditionality in the UK: from welfare rights to conditional entitlements?’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29: 2, 266–87.
Dwyer, P. (2008), ‘The conditional welfare state’, in Powell, M. (ed.), Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair legacy, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Edwards, R., Duncan, S., Reynolds, T. and Alldred, P. (2002), ‘A mother's instinct? Paid work, partnering and childcare’, Working Paper 26, Centre for Research on Family, Kinship and Childhood, University of Leeds.
Fagan, C. (2001), ‘Time, money and the gender order: work orientations and working-time preferences in Britain’, Gender, Work and Organization, 8: 3, 239–66.
Finn, D. (2009), ‘The welfare market and Flexible New Deal: lessons from other countries’, Local Economy, 24: 1, 3845.
Ford, R. (1996), Childcare in the Balance: How Lone Parents Make Decisions About Work, London: Policy Studies Institute.
Freud, D. (2007), Reducing Dependency, Increasing Opportunity: Options for the Future of Welfare to Work, Department for Work and Pensions, Leeds: Corporate Document Services,, downloaded 06/10/10.
Giddens, A. (2002), Where Now for New Labour? Oxford: Fabian Society/Policy Network and Polity Press.
Grayling, C. (2010), ‘The Work Programme’, speech by the Minister for Employment to the Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion, Welfare to Work Event, Thursday 1 July,, downloaded 04/10/10.
Greener, I. (2007), ‘Choice and voice – a review’, Social Policy and Society, 7: 2, 255–65.
Greener, I. (2008), ‘The stages of New Labour’, in Powell, M. (ed.), Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair Legacy, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Gregg, P. (2008), Realising Potential: A Vision for Personalised Conditionality and Support, An Independent Review to the Department for Work and Pensions,, downloaded 29/07/09.
Grover, C. (2005), ‘The National Childcare Strategy: the social regulation of lone mothers as a gendered reserve army of labour’, Capital and Class, 85: 6390.
Grover, C. (2007), ‘The Freud Report on the future of welfare to work: some critical reflections’, Critical Social Policy, 27: 4, 534–45.
Grover, C. and Piggott, L. (2007), ‘Social security, employment and Incapacity Benefit: critical reflections on A New Deal for Welfare’, Disability and Society, 22: 7, 733–46.
Grover, C. and Stewart, S. (2002), The Work Connection – The Role of Social Security in British Economic Regulation, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Hakim, C. (2000), Work Life Style Choices in the Twenty First Century: Preference Theory, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hakim, C. (2004), Key Issues in Women's Work: Female Diversity and the Polarisation of Women's Employment, London: Glass House Press.
Treasury, HM (2008), Improving Delivery and Choice: Modernising Britain's Tax and Benefits System Number Twelve, a discussion paper,, downloaded 29/07/09.
Treasury, HM (2010), Budget 2010, HC 61,, downloaded 04/10/10.
Holtermann, S., Brannen, J., Moss, P. and Owen, C. (1999), Lone Parents and the Labour Market: Results from the 1997 Labour Force Survey and Review of Research, Employment Services Research Report No. 23, London: HSMO.
Hoxhallari, L.Connolly, A. and Lyon, N. (2007), Families with Children in Britain: Findings from the 2005 Families and Children Study (FACS), DWP Research Report No. 424, Leeds: Corporate Documents Services.
Johnson, A. (2002), Job Retention and Advancement in Employment: Review of Research Evidence, Department for Work and Pensions In House Research Report No. 98, London: HSMO.
Knijn, T., Martin, C. and Millar, J. (2007), ‘Activation as a common framework for social policies towards lone parents’, Social Policy and Administration, 41: 6, 638–52.
Lewis, J. (2003), ‘Developing early years childcare in England, 1997–2002: the choices for (working) mothers’, Social Policy and Administration, 37: 3, 219–38.
McCrae, S. (2003a), ‘Constraints and choices in mothers’ employment careers: a consideration of Hakim's Preference Theory’, British Journal of Sociology, 54: 4, 317–38.
McCrae, S. (2003b), ‘Choice and constraints in mothers’ employment careers: McCrae replies to Hakim’, British Journal of Sociology, 54: 4, 585–92.
McKay, S. and Atkinson, A. (2007), Disability and Caring among Families with Children: Family Employment and Poverty Characteristics, Department for Work and Pensions Research Report No. 460, London: Corporate Documents Services.
Millar, J. (2006), ‘Better off in work? Work, security and welfare for lone mothers’, in Glendinning, C. and Kemp, P. A. (eds.), Cash and Care: Policy Challenges in the Welfare State, Bristol: Policy Press.
Millar, J. and Ridge, T. (2008), ‘Relationships of care: working lone mothers, their children and employment sustainability’, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 1, 103–21.
Needham, C. (2008), ‘Choice in public services: no choice but to choose!’, in Powell, M. (ed.), Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair Legacy, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Purnell, J. (2008), Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, speech at the Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion Conference, Birmingham, 25 June,, downloaded 29/07/09.
Rafferty, A. L. and Wiggan, J. (2008), Supporting Lone Parents into Work: Examining the Role of Private Recruitment Agencies, London: Recruitment and Employment Confederation Industry Research Unit/Adecco Institute.
Rowlingson, K. and McKay, S. (2005), ‘Lone motherhood and socio-economic disadvantage: insights from quantitative and qualitative evidence’, Sociological Review, 53: 1, 3049.
Sen, A. (1997), ‘Inequality, unemployment and contemporary Europe’, International Labour Review, 136: 2, 165–72.
Welfare Reform Act (2007), (C.5) London: The Stationery Office,, downloaded 05/02/10.
Welfare Reform Act (2009), London: The Stationery Office,, downloaded 10/02/10.
Wilcox, P. (2000), ‘Lone motherhood: the impact on living standards of leaving a violent relationship’, Social Policy and Administration, 34: 2, 176–90.
Williams, F. (2001), ‘In and beyond New Labour: towards a new political ethics of care’, Critical Social Policy, 21: 4, 467–93.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed