Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Complying, Transforming or Resisting in the New Austerity? Realigning Social Welfare and Independent Action among English Voluntary Organisations

  • LINDA MILBOURNE (a1) and MIKE CUSHMAN (a2)

Abstract

This paper considers implications for the English voluntary sector of recent shifts in the terms of engagement with the state following rapid political and policy changes under the UK Coalition government. It explores how ideas of what constitutes the voluntary sector are being reconstructed in policy and practical settings, examining processes contributing to re-shaping the voluntary sector's conception of itself and beliefs about legitimate activities and aspirations. It draws on theories of institutional isomorphism and governmentality to explore these changes which appear to be modifying and restricting the voluntary sector's role in social welfare, limiting its influence and its ability to act simultaneously within and against the state. The paper argues the integral role of the state in recasting the roles of different sectors but also discusses the extent to which voluntary sector compliance is necessary to ensure organisational survival, asking what spaces exist for independent activity and resistance.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Aberg, P. (2013), ‘Managing expectations, demands and myths: Swedish study associations caught between civil society, the state and the market’, Voluntas, 24: 3, 537–58.
Alcock, P. and Kendall, J. (2011), ‘Constituting the third sector: processes of decontestation and contention under the UK Labour government in England’, Voluntas, 22: 3, 450–69.
Baines, S., Hardill, I. and Wilson, R. (2011), ‘Introduction: remixing the economy of welfare?’, Social Policy and Society, 10: 3, 337–9.
Baring Foundation (2014), Independence Undervalued: The Voluntary Sector in 2014, London: Baring Foundation.
Barnes, M. and Prior, D. (2009), Subversive Citizens: Power, Agency and Resistance in Public Services, Bristol: Policy Press.
Bawden, A. (2013), ‘We’ve got 5 years left, at best’, Society Guardian, 24 July, 32.
Beveridge, W. (1948), Voluntary Action, London: George Allen & Unwin.
Bevir, M. (2011), ‘Democratic governance: a genealogy’, Local Government Studies, 37: 1, 317.
Billis, D. and Glennerster, H. (1998), ‘Human services and the voluntary sector: towards a theory of comparative advantage’, Journal of Social Policy, 27: 1, 998.
Big Lottery Fund (BLF) (2011), Transforming Local Infrastructure Programme, London: Big Lottery Fund.
Blond, P. (2010), Red Tory, London: Faber & Faber.
Brown, P. (2012), ‘A nudge in the right direction? Towards a sociological engagement with libertarian paternalism’, Social Policy and Society, 11: 3, 305–18.
Brown, P. and Calnan, M. (2010), ‘The risks of managing uncertainty: the limitations of governance and choice, and the potential for trust’, Social Policy and Society, 9: 1, 1324.
Buckingham, H. (2011), ‘Hybridity, diversity and the division of labour in the third sector: what can we learn from homelessness organisations in the UK?’, Voluntary Sector Review, 2: 2, 157–75.
Cairns, B., Hutchinson, R. and Aiken, M. (2010), ‘It's not what we do, it's how we do it’, Voluntary Sector Review, 1: 2, 193208.
Carmel, E. and Harlock, J. (2008), ‘Instituting the “third sector” as a governable terrain: partnership, procurement and performance in the UK’, Policy and Politics, 36: 2, 155–71.
CESI (2012), ‘Save the children appeal attacked for its political agenda’, Centre for Economic and Social Inclusion, London, September 2012.
Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S. and McLaughlin, E. (2000), New Managerialism, New Welfare? London: Sage.
Clegg, S. (1989), Frameworks of Power, London: Sage.
Davies, J. S. (2011), Challenging Governance Theory: From Networks to Hegemony, Bristol: Policy Press.
Department for Communities and Local Government (DCLG) (2012), ‘50 ways to save: examples of sensible savings in local government’, Department for Communities and Local Government, London, December 2012.
Di Maggio, P. and Powell, W. (1983), ‘The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organisational fields’, American Sociological Review, 48: 147–60.
Eikenberry, A. (2009), ‘Refusing the market: a democratic discourse for voluntary and non-profit organisations’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38: 4, 582–96.
Foucault, M. (1977), ‘Truth and power’, in Gordon, C. (ed.), Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977, New York: Pantheon.
Harris, M. and Rochester, C. (2001), Voluntary Organisations and Social Policy in Britain, Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Harris, M. (2010), ‘Third sector organizations in a contradictory policy environment’, in Billis, D. (ed.), Hybrid Organizations and the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 2545.
Harris, M. and Young, P. (2009), ‘Developing community and social cohesion through grassroots bridge-building: an exploration’, Policy and Politics, 37: 4, 517–34.
Hoggett, P. (2004), ‘Overcoming the desire for misunderstanding through dialogue’, in Snape, S. and Taylor, P. (eds.), Partnerships between Health and Local Government, London: Frank Cass, pp. 118–26.
Hoggett, P., Wilkinson, H. and Beedell, P. (2013), ‘Fairness and the politics of resentment’, Journal of Social Policy, 42: 3, 567–86.
Holloway, J. (2005), Change the World without Taking Power, London: Pluto Press.
Horton, C. (2013), ‘Work Programme: when jobs aren't there’, Society Guardian, 21 May 2013.
Hucklesby, A. and Corcoran, M. (2013), Voluntary Sector Involvement in Criminal Justice: Controversies and Challenges, London: Voluntary Sector Studies Network Conference, 15 May.
Kendall, J. and Knapp, M. (1996), The Voluntary Sector in the UK, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Lever, J. (2011), ‘Urban regeneration partnerships: a figurational critique of governmentality theory’, Sociology, 45: 1, 86101.
Lewis, J. (2005), ‘New Labour's approach to the voluntary sector: independence and the meaning of partnership’, Social Policy and Society, 4: 2, 121–31.
Lindsey, R. (2013), ‘Exploring local hotspots and deserts: investigating the local distribution of charitable resources’, Voluntary Sector Review, 4: 1, 3954.
Long, J. (2012), ‘£46m payout for A4e despite missing Work Programme targets’, Channel 4 news, Social Affairs reports, http://www.channel4.com/news/46m-payout-for-a4e-despite-missing-work-programme-targets (accessed 24 October 2013).
Macmillan, R. (2013a), ‘Decoupling the state and the third sector? The Big Society as a spontaneous order ‘, Voluntary Sector Review, 4: 2, 185204.
Macmillan, R. (2013b), ‘Distinction in the third sector’, Voluntary Sector Review, 4: 1, 3954.
Marsden, S. (2011), Pushed to the Edge, London: Locality.
McCabe, A. and Phillimore, J. (2010), ‘Understanding the distinctiveness of small scale third sector activity’, Working paper (33), Third Sector Research Centre, University of Birmingham.
Milbourne, L. (2013), Voluntary Sector in Transition: Hard Times or New Opportunities? Bristol: Policy Press.
Milbourne, L. and Cushman, M. (2013), ‘From the third sector to the Big Society: how changing UK government policies have eroded third sector trust’, Voluntas, 24: 2, 485508.
Miller, P. and Rose, N. (1990), ‘Governing economic life’, Economy and Society, 19: 1, 131.
Mosley, J. (2011), ‘Institutionalization, privatization and political opportunity: what tactical choices reveal about the policy advocacy of human service nonprofits’, Voluntas, 40: 3, 435–57.
Murray, U. (2012), ‘Local government and the meaning of publicness’, in Manson, J. (ed.), Public Service on the Brink, Exeter: Imprint Academic, pp. 4166.
National Coalition for Independent Action (NCIA) (2014), ‘Inquiry into the future of voluntary services’, National Coalition for Independent Action, http://www.independentaction.net/category/inquiry-voluntary-services/.
National Council for Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) (2013), UK Civil Society Almanac, London: National Council for Voluntary Organisations.
National Coalition for Independent Action (OCS) (2010), Supporting a Stronger Civil Society: An Office for Civil Society Consultation on Improving Support for Frontline Civil Society Organisations, London: Cabinet Office, Office for Civil Society.
Padley, M. (2013), ‘Delivering localism: the critical role of trust and collaboration’, Social Policy and Society, 12: 3, 343354.
Pfeffer, J. (2003), The External Control of Organizations, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Rees, J., Taylor, R. and Damm, C. (2013), ‘Does sector matter? Understanding the experiences of providers in the Work Programme’, Third Sector Research Centre, Working paper 92, February.
Rochester, C. (2013), Rediscovering Voluntary Action: The Beat of a Different Drum, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rose, N. (1999), Powers of Freedom: Reframing Political Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Slater, D. and Tonkiss, F. (2001), Market Society, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Stake, R. (2000), ‘Case studies’ in Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Taylor, M. (2011), ‘Community organising and the big society: is Saul Alinsky turning in his grave?’, Voluntary Sector Review, 2: 2, 257–65.
Taylor, M. (2012), ‘The changing fortunes of community’, Voluntary Sector Review, 3: 1, 1534.
Thaler, R. and Sunstein, C. (2008), Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth and Happiness, London: Yale University Press.
Willmott, H. (2013), ‘Can institutional theory be critical?’, Paper presented to 8th International Conference in Critical Management Studies, Manchester, 10–12 July.
Wright, O. (2013), ‘Revealed: the great outsourcing scandal as firms cut corners to cream profits off public’, Independent, 18 July 2013, http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/revealed-the-great-outsourcing-scandal-as-firms-cut-corners-to-cream-profits-off-public-8715119.html.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed