Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The ‘Deserving’ Rich? Inequality, Morality and Social Policy

  • KAREN ROWLINGSON (a1) and STUART CONNOR (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

There is a long tradition in social policy of discussing and critiquing the notion of ‘deservingness’ in relation to ‘the poor’. This paper will apply such debates to ‘the rich’ to consider the grounds on which this group might be considered ‘deserving’. The paper identifies three sets of arguments. The first set of arguments concerns the appropriateness of rewarding merit/hard work/effort/risk-taking etc. The second concerns more consequentialist/economic arguments about providing incentives for wealth creation. And the third considers the character and behaviour of the rich. As well as discussing the potential criteria for deservingness, the paper will also debate whether the degree of income and wealth gained by the rich is deserved. Finally, the paper will discuss the social policy implications, including taxation policies, which emerge from this debate.

Copyright
Corresponding author
email: k.rowlingson@bham.ac.uk
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

H. Dean with M. Melrose (1999), Poverty, Riches and Social Citizenship, Basingstoke: Macmillan.

R. Higginson and D. Clough (2010), The Ethics of Executive Remuneration: A Guide for Christian Investors, Church Investors’ Group, http://www.churchinvestorsgroup.org.uk/~churchin/system/files/Ethics_of_executive_remuneration_V2_09A.pdf

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 28
Total number of PDF views: 172 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 524 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.