Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Beyond Modernisation? Social Care and the Transformation of Welfare Governance

  • JANET NEWMAN (a1), CAROLINE GLENDINNING (a2) and MICHAEL HUGHES (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

This article reflects on the process and outcomes of modernisation in adult social care in England and Wales, drawing particularly on the recently completed Modernising Adult Social Care (MASC) research programme commissioned by the Department of Health. We begin by exploring the contested status of ‘modernisation’ as a descriptor of reform. We then outline some of the distinctive features of adult social care services and suggest that these features introduce dynamics likely to shape both the experiences and outcomes of policy ambitions for modernisation. We then reflect on the evidence emerging from the MASC studies and develop a model for illuminating some of the dynamics of welfare governance. Finally, we highlight the emerging focus on individualisation and on user-directed and controlled services. We argue that the current focus of modernisation involves a reduced emphasis on structural and institutional approaches to change and an increased emphasis on changes in the behaviours and roles of adult social care service users. This focus has implications for both the future dynamics of welfare governance and for conceptions of citizenship.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Baldock (1997), ‘Social care in old age: more than a funding problem’, Social Policy and Administration, 31: 1, 7389.

M. Bevir and R. A. W. Rhodes (2003), Interpreting British Government, London: Routledge.

H de Bruijn . (2002), Managing Performance in the Public Sector, London: Routledge.

J. Clarke (2005), ‘New Labour's citizens: activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned?’, Critical Social Policy, 25: 4, 447–63.

B. Dowling , M. Powell and C. Glendinning (2004), ‘Conceptualising successful partnerships’, Health and Social Care in the Community, 12: 4, 309–17.

K. Ellis (2007), ‘Direct payments and social work practice: the significance of “street-level bureaucracy” in determining eligibility’, British Journal of Social Work, 37: 405–22.

I. Ferguson (2007), ‘Increasing user choice or privatising risk? The antinomies of personalisation’, British Journal of Social Work, 37: 387403.

C. Glendinning (2002), ‘Partnerships between health and social services: developing a framework for evaluation’, Policy and Politics, 30: 1, 115–27.

C. Glendinning and R. Means (2004), ‘Rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic of long-term care – is organisational integration the answer?’, Critical Social Policy, 24: 4, 435–51.

B. Hudson and M. Henwood (2002), ‘The NHS and Social Care – the final countdown’, Policy and Politics, 30: 2, 153–66

J. Lewis (2001), ‘Older people and the health–social care boundary in the UK: half a century of hidden policy conflict’, Social Policy and Administration, 35: 4, 343–59.

N. Lunt , P. Mannion and P. Smith (1996), ‘Economic discourse and the market: the case of community care’, Public Administration, 74: 3, 369–91.

C. Needham (2007), The Reform of Public Services under New Labour, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

P. Scourfield (2007), ‘Social care and the modern citizen: client, consumer, service users, manager and entrepreneur’, British Journal of Social Work, 37: 107–22.

H. Spandler (2004), ‘Friend or foe? Towards a critical assessment of direct payments’, Critical Social Policy, 24: 2, 187209.

J. D. Stewart (2003), Modernising British Local Government: An Assessment of Labour's Reform Programme, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×