Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Building the Eco-social State: Do Welfare Regimes Matter?

  • MAX KOCH (a1) and MARTIN FRITZ (a2)
Abstract
Abstract

Authors such as Dryzek, Gough and Meadowcroft have indicated that social-democratic welfare states could be in a better position to deal with development of the ‘green’ or ‘eco’ state, and the intersection of social and environmental policies, than conservative or liberal welfare regimes (synergy hypothesis). However, this hypothesis has as yet not been examined in comparative empirical research. Based on comparative empirical data from EUROSTAT, the World Bank, the OECD, the Global Footprint Network and the International Social Survey Programme, we are carrying out two research operations: First, by applying correspondence analysis, we contrast the macro-structural welfare and sustainability indicators of thirty countries and ask whether clusters largely follow the synergy hypothesis. Second, we raise the issue of whether differences in the institutional and organisational capabilities of combining welfare with environmental policies are reflected in people's attitudes and opinions. With regard to the first issue, our results suggest that there is no ‘automatic’ development of the ecostate based on already existing advanced welfare institutions. Representatives of all welfare regimes are spread across established, deadlocked, failing, emerging and endangered ecostates. As for the second issue, the results are mixed. While responses to the statements ‘economic growth always harms the environment’ and ‘governments should pass laws to make ordinary people protect the environment, even if it interferes with people's rights to make their own decisions’ did not vary according to welfare regimes, people from social-democratic countries expressed more often than average their willingness to accept cuts in their standard of living in order to protect the environment.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

W. Arts and J. Gelissen (2002), ‘Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report’, Journal of European Social Policy, 12: 2, 137–58.

J. Blasius and M. Greenacre (2006), ‘Multiple correspondence analysis and related methods in practice’, in M. Greenacre and J. Blasius (eds.), Multiple Correspondence Analysis and Related Methods, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.

M. Borucke , D. Moore , G. Cranston , K. Gracey , K. Iha , J. Larson , E. Lazarus , J. C. Morales , M. Wackernagel and A. Galli (2013), ‘Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere's regenerative capacity: the National Footprint Accounts’ underlying methodology and framework’, Ecological Indicators, 24: 518–33.

M. Büchs , N. Bardsley and S. Duwe (2012), ‘Who bears the brunt? Distributional effects of climate change mitigation policies’, Critical Social Policy, 31: 2, 285307.

J. Dryzek , D. Downes , C. Hunhold , D. Schlosberg and H. Hernes (2003), Green States and Social Movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany and Norway, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

M. Ferrara (1996) ‘The “Southern” model of welfare in social Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 6: 1, 1737.

I. Gough (2010), ‘Economic crisis, climate change and the future of welfare states’, 21st Century Society, 5: 1, 5164.

I. Gough , J. Meadowcroft , J. Dryzek , J. Gerhards , H. Lengfield , A. Markandya and R. Ortiz (2008), ‘JESP symposium: climate change and social policy’, Journal of European Social Policy, 18: 4, 325–44.

M. Greenacre (2007), Correspondence Analysis in Practice, 2nd edn, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall.

M. Koch (2012), Capitalism and Climate Change: Theoretical Analysis, Historical Development and Policy Responses, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

M. Koch (2013), ‘Welfare after growth: theoretical discussion and policy implications’, International Journal of Social Quality, 3: 1, 420.

D. Liefferink , B. Arts , J. Kamstra and J. Ooijevaar (2009), ‘Leaders and laggards in environmental policy: a quantitative analysis of domestic policy inputs’, Journal of European Public Policies, 16: 5, 677700.

L. E. Scruggs (1999), ‘Institutions and environmental performance in seventeen Western democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 29: 1, 131.

S. Sung and G. Pascall (2014) ‘Introduction: gender and welfare states in East Asia’, in S. Sung and G. Pascall (eds.), Gender and Welfare States in East Asia: Confucianism or Gender Equality? Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

P. A. Victor (2008), Managing without Growth: Slower by Design, not Disaster, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×