Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Choice and Welfare Reform: Lone Parents’ Decision Making around Paid Work and Family Life


Welfare-to-work policy in the UK sees ‘choice’ regarding lone parents’ employment decisions increasingly defined in terms of powers of selection between options within active labour market programmes, with constraints on the option of non-market activity progressively tightened. In this paper, we examine the wider choice agenda in public services in relation to lone-parent employment, focusing on the period following the 2007 Freud Review of welfare provision. (Freud, 2007) Survey data are used to estimate the extent to which recent policies promoting compulsory job search by youngest dependent child age map onto lone parents' own stated decision-making regarding if and when to enter the labour market. The findings indicate a substantial proportion of lone parents targeted by policy reform currently do not want a job and that their main reported reason is that they are looking after their children. Economically inactive lone mothers also remain more likely to have other chronic employment barriers, which traverse dependent child age categories. Some problems, such as poor health, sickness or disability, are particularly acute among those with older dependent children who are the target of recent activation policy.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M. Benzeval (1998), ‘The self reported health status of lone parents’, Social Science and Medicine, 46: 10, 1337–53.

J. Clarke (2005), ‘New Labour's citizen's: activated, empowered, responsibilized, abandoned?’, Critical Social Policy, 25: 4, 447–63.

P. Convery (2009), ‘Welfare to work: from special measures to 80 percent employment’, Local Economy, 24: 1, 127.

R. Crompton (1998), ‘Explaining women's employment patterns’, British Journal of Sociology, 49: 1, 118–36.

S. Duncan and R. Edwards (1999), Lone Mothers, Paid-work and Gendered Moral Rationalities, Basingstoke: Palgrave.

P. Dwyer (2004), ‘Creeping conditionality in the UK: from welfare rights to conditional entitlements?’, Canadian Journal of Sociology, 29: 2, 266–87.

P. Dwyer (2008), ‘The conditional welfare state’, in M. Powell (ed.), Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair legacy, Bristol: The Policy Press.

C. Fagan (2001), ‘Time, money and the gender order: work orientations and working-time preferences in Britain’, Gender, Work and Organization, 8: 3, 239–66.

D. Finn (2009), ‘The welfare market and Flexible New Deal: lessons from other countries’, Local Economy, 24: 1, 3845.

I. Greener (2008), ‘The stages of New Labour’, in M. Powell (ed.), Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair Legacy, Bristol: The Policy Press.

C. Grover (2007), ‘The Freud Report on the future of welfare to work: some critical reflections’, Critical Social Policy, 27: 4, 534–45.

C. Grover and L. Piggott (2007), ‘Social security, employment and Incapacity Benefit: critical reflections on A New Deal for Welfare’, Disability and Society, 22: 7, 733–46.

T. Knijn , C. Martin and J. Millar (2007), ‘Activation as a common framework for social policies towards lone parents’, Social Policy and Administration, 41: 6, 638–52.

J. Lewis (2003), ‘Developing early years childcare in England, 1997–2002: the choices for (working) mothers’, Social Policy and Administration, 37: 3, 219–38.

S. McCrae (2003a), ‘Constraints and choices in mothers’ employment careers: a consideration of Hakim's Preference Theory’, British Journal of Sociology, 54: 4, 317–38.

S. McCrae (2003b), ‘Choice and constraints in mothers’ employment careers: McCrae replies to Hakim’, British Journal of Sociology, 54: 4, 585–92.

J. Millar (2006), ‘Better off in work? Work, security and welfare for lone mothers’, in C. Glendinning and P. A. Kemp (eds.), Cash and Care: Policy Challenges in the Welfare State, Bristol: Policy Press.

C. Needham (2008), ‘Choice in public services: no choice but to choose!’, in M. Powell (ed.), Modernising the Welfare State: The Blair Legacy, Bristol: The Policy Press.

K. Rowlingson and S. McKay (2005), ‘Lone motherhood and socio-economic disadvantage: insights from quantitative and qualitative evidence’, Sociological Review, 53: 1, 3049.

P. Wilcox (2000), ‘Lone motherhood: the impact on living standards of leaving a violent relationship’, Social Policy and Administration, 34: 2, 176–90.

F. Williams (2001), ‘In and beyond New Labour: towards a new political ethics of care’, Critical Social Policy, 21: 4, 467–93.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *