Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 13
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Montgomerie, Johnna and Tepe-Belfrage, Daniela 2016. A Feminist Moral-Political Economy of Uneven Reform in Austerity Britain: Fostering Financial and Parental Literacy. Globalizations, p. 1.


    Parr, Sadie 2016. Conceptualising ‘The Relationship’ in Intensive Key Worker Support as a Therapeutic Medium. Journal of Social Work Practice, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 25.


    Sen, Robin and Churchill, Harriet 2016. Some Useful Sources. Social Policy and Society, Vol. 15, Issue. 02, p. 331.


    Sen, Robin 2016. Building Relationships in a Cold Climate: A Case Study of Family Engagement within an ‘Edge of Care’ Family Support Service. Social Policy and Society, Vol. 15, Issue. 02, p. 289.


    Wills, Jane Whittaker, Andrew Rickard, Wendy and Felix, Claire 2016. Troubled, Troubling or in Trouble: The Stories of ‘Troubled Families’. British Journal of Social Work, p. bcw061.


    Bond-Taylor, Sue 2015. Dimensions of Family Empowerment in Work with So-Called ‘Troubled’ Families. Social Policy and Society, Vol. 14, Issue. 03, p. 371.


    Hayden, Carol and Jenkins, Craig 2015. Children taken into care and custody and the ‘troubled families’ agenda in England. Child & Family Social Work, Vol. 20, Issue. 4, p. 459.


    Parr, Sadie 2015. Integrating critical realist and feminist methodologies: ethical and analytical dilemmas. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 193.


    Roberts, Louise 2015. Using Part-Time Fostering as a Family Support Service: Advantages, Challenges and Contradictions: Figure 1. British Journal of Social Work, p. bcv075.


    Hayden, Carol and Jenkins, Craig 2014. ‘Troubled Families’ Programme in England: ‘wicked problems’ and policy-based evidence. Policy Studies, Vol. 35, Issue. 6, p. 631.


    McGavock, L. and Spratt, T. 2014. Prevalence of Adverse Childhood Experiences in a University Population: Associations with Use of Social Services. British Journal of Social Work, Vol. 44, Issue. 3, p. 657.


    Hodgkinson, Sarah and Jones, Diane 2013. The use of family intervention projects to deal with anti-social behaviour: A preliminary study of keyworker perceptions. Crime Prevention & Community Safety, Vol. 15, Issue. 4, p. 278.


    Parr, Sadie 2011. Intensive family casework with ‘problem families’: Past and present. Family Science, Vol. 2, Issue. 4, p. 240.


    ×

Family Policy and the Governance of Anti-Social Behaviour in the UK: Women's Experiences of Intensive Family Support

  • SADIE PARR (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0047279410000735
  • Published online: 15 November 2010
Abstract
Abstract

In seeking to make sense of the role of intensive family support in the governance of anti-social behaviour, this paper focuses analytical attention on one case study project, the Family Support Service. It draws on interview material from five women whose experiences were tracked in repeat interviews over an 18-month period. The Family Support Service entailed intense surveillance and supervision of marginalised populations in domestic private spaces and did, therefore, have controlling and disciplinary qualities, particularly with regard to the families living in ‘core’ residential accommodation. Yet, in spite of this, the Family Support Service also contained a significant social welfare ethos based on finding long-term sustainable solutions to individuals’ problems, not least security of housing and income. This paper argues that while we must confront the worrying and disconcerting aspects of intensive family support, the intervention might be conducive to helping disadvantaged and troubled families access better lives. There is a need for further research, however, about how to achieve less punitive types of family intervention and, therefore, how progressive change for vulnerable families might be generated.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R. Arthur (2005), ‘Punishing parents for the crimes of their children’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 44: 3, 233–53.

E. Burney and L. Gelsthorpe (2008), ‘Do we need a naughty step? Rethinking the Parenting Order after ten years’, The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47: 5, 470–85.

K. Clarke (2006), ‘Childhood, parenting and early intervention: a critical examination of the Sure Start national programme’, Critical Social Policy, 26: 4, 699721.

B. Featherstone (2006), ‘Re-thinking family support in the current policy context’, British Journal of Social Work, 36: 1, 519.

P. M. Garrett (2006), ‘Making “anti-social behaviour”: a fragment on the evolution of “ASBO politics” in Britain’, British Journal of Social Work, 37: 5, 839–56.

P. M. Garrett (2007), ‘Sinbin solutions: the “pioneer” projects for “problem families” and the forgetfulness of social policy research’, Critical Social Policy, 27: 2, 203–30.

V. Gillies (2005), ‘Meeting parents’ needs? Discourses of “support” and “inclusion” in family policy’, Critical Social Policy, 25: 1, 7090.

D. Gilling (2007), Crime Reduction and Community Safety: Labour and Politics of Local Crime Control, Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

B. Goldson and J. Jamieson (2002), ‘Youth crime, the “parenting deficit” and state intervention: a contextual critique’, Youth Justice, 2: 2, 8299.

C. Hunter and J. Nixon (2001), ‘Taking the blame and losing the home: women and anti-social behaviour’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 23: 4, 395410.

R. Lister (2006), ‘Children (but not women) first: New Labour, child welfare and gender’, Critical Social Policy, 26: 2, 315–35.

R. Matthews (2009), ‘Beyond “so what?” criminology’, Theoretical Criminology, 13: 3, 341–62.

D. Prior (2009), ‘The “problem” of anti-social behaviour and the policy knowledge base: analysing the power/knowledge relationship’, Critical Social Policy, 29: 1, 523.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×