Skip to main content
×
Home

Grandparent Care: A Key Factor in Mothers’ Labour Force Participation in the UK

  • SHIREEN KANJI (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The relationships between paid work and informal care are critical to understanding how paid work is made possible. An extensive source of childcare in the UK is the intergenerational care grandparents provide. Using data from the UK's Millennium Cohort Study, a nationally representative sample of children born in 2000, biprobit and instrumental variables (IV) analysis of mothers’ participation (given the social construction of caring responsibility) identifies a significant causal effect of grandparents’ childcare in that it: (i)

raises the labour force participation of mothers with a child of school entry age on average by 12 percentage points (the average marginal effect);

(ii)

raises the participation of the group of mothers who use grandparent childcare by 33 percentage points compared to the situation if they did not have access to this care (the average treatment effect on the treated).

Thus grandparent-provided childcare has a substantial impact on the labour market in the UK, an impact that may not be sustainable with forthcoming changes to the state pension age. Grandparents’ childcare increases the labour force participation of lone and partnered mothers at all levels of educational qualifications but by different degrees. Grandparents’ childcare enables mothers to enter paid work rather than extending their hours of paid work.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Grandparent Care: A Key Factor in Mothers’ Labour Force Participation in the UK
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Grandparent Care: A Key Factor in Mothers’ Labour Force Participation in the UK
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Grandparent Care: A Key Factor in Mothers’ Labour Force Participation in the UK
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Aassve A., Arpino B. and Goisis A. (2012), ‘Grandparenting and mothers’ labour force participation: A comparative analysis using the generations and gender survey’, Demographic Research, 27, 5384.
Angrist J. D., Imbens G. W. and Rubin D. B. (1996), ‘Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables’, Journal of the American statistical Association, 91 (434), 444455.
Arpino B., Pronzato C. D. and Tavares L. P. (2014), ‘The effect of grandparental support on mothers’ labour market participation: an instrumental variable approach’, European Journal of Population, 30 (4), 369390.
Ashwin S., Tartakovskaya I., Ilyina M. and Lytkina T. (2013), ‘Gendering reciprocity solving a puzzle of nonreciprocation’, Gender and society, 27 (3), 396421.
Attar-Schwartz S., Tan J. P., Buchanan A., Flouri E. and Griggs J. (2009), ‘Grandparenting and adolescent adjustment in two-parent biological, lone-parent, and step-families’, Journal of Family Psychology, 23, 1, 67.
Attias-Donfut C. and Wolff F.-C. (2000), ‘Complementarity between private and public transfers’ in Arber S. and Attias-Donfut C. (eds), The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and State in Ageing Societies. (pp. 4768.). London: Routledge.
Bengtson V. L. (2001), ‘Beyond the nuclear family: The increasing importance of multigenerational bonds’, Journal of Marriage and Family, 63, 1, 116.
Bengtson V. L. and Roberts R. E. (1991), ‘Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: An example of formal theory construction’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 4, 856870.
Becker G. S. and Tomes N. (1986), ‘Human capital and the rise and fall of families’, Journal of Labor Economics, 4, 3, S1–S39.
Bourdieu P. (1977), Outline of a theory of practice (Vol. 16), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bradshaw J. (2010), Child poverty and child-well being in the European Union, Policy overview and policy impact analysis: A case study: UK in Child poverty and child well-being in the European Union, Report prepared for the European Commission. Tarki: Budapest, Hungary.
Brewer M. and Gregg P. (2002), Eradicating child poverty in Britain: welfare reform and children since 1997. 02, 052. Retrieved from University of Bristol website: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/media-library/sites/cmpo/migrated/documents/wp52.pdf
Chan T. W. and Ermisch J. (2015), ‘Proximity of couples to parents: influences of gender, labor market, and family’, Demography, 52, 2, 379399.
Chiburis R. C., Das J. and Lokshin M. (2012), ‘A practical comparison of the bivariate probit and linear IV estimators’, Economics Letters, 117, 3, 762766.
Compton J. and Pollak R. A. (2014), ‘Family proximity, childcare, and women's labor force attachment’, Journal of Urban Economics, 79, 7290.
Del Boca D. and Vuri D. (2007), ‘The mismatch between employment and child care in Italy: the impact of rationing’, Journal of Population Economics, 20, 4, 805832.
Del Boca D., Piazzalunga D. and Pronzato C. (2017), ‘The role of grandparenting in early childcare and child outcomes’, Review of Economics of the Household, 1–36.
Di Gessa G., Glaser K., Price D., Ribe E. and Tinker A. (2016), ‘What drives national differences in intensive grandparental childcare in Europe?’, The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 71, 1, 141153.
Dimova R. and Wolff F.-C. (2008), ‘Grandchildcare transfers by ageing immigrants in France: Intra-household allocation and labour market implications’, European Journal of Population, 24, 3, 315340.
Dimova R. and Wolff F.-C. (2011), ‘Do downward private transfers enhance maternal labour supply? Evidence from around Europe’, Journal of Population Economics, 24, 3, 911933.
Duncan A., Paull G. and Taylor J. (2001), Price and quality in the UK childcare market, IFS Working Papers No. 01, 14, IFS: London.
Folbre N. (2001), The invisible heart: Economics and family values, New York: New Press.
Francesconi M. and Van der Klaauw W. (2007), ‘The socioeconomic consequences of ‘in-work’ benefit reform for British lone mothers’, The Journal of Human Resources, 42, 1, 131.
Glaser K., Ribé Montserrat E., Waginger U., Price D., Stuchbury R. and Tinker A. (2010), Grandparenting in Europe, London: Grandparents Plus.
Gray A. (2005), ‘The changing availability of grandparents as carers and its implications for childcare policy in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 34, 4, 557577.
Grundy E., Murphy M. and Shelton N. (1999), ‘Looking beyond the household: intergenerational perspectives on living kin and contacts with kin in Great Britain’, Population Trends, 97, 1927.
Hagestad G. O. (2006), ‘Transfers between grandparents and grandchildren: The importance of taking a three-generation perspective’, Zeitschrift für Familienforschung, 18, 3, 315332.
Hank K. and Buber I. (2009), ‘Grandparents caring for their grandchildren. Findings from the 2004 Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe’, Journal of Family Issues, 30, 1, 5373.
Heckman J. and Robb R. (1985), ‘Alternative methods for evaluating the impact of interventions: An overview’, Journal of Econometrics, 30, 1–2, 239267.
Himmelweit S. and Sigala M. (2004), ‘Choice and the relationship between identities and behaviour for mothers with pre-school children: some implications for policy from a UK study’, Journal of Social Policy, 33, 3, 455478.
Ho C. (2015), ‘Grandchild care, intergenerational transfers, and grandparents’ labor supply’, Review of Economics of the Household, 13, 2, 359384.
Igel C. and Szydlik M. (2011), ‘Grandchild care and welfare state arrangements in Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 21, 3, 210224.
Joshi H., Macran S. and Dex S. (1996), ‘Employment childbearing and women's subsequent labour force participation. Evidence from the British 1958 birth cohort’,Journal of Population Economics, 9, 3, 325348.
Kanji S. (2010), ‘What keeps mothers in full-time employment?European Sociological Review, 27,4, 509525.
Kanji S. (2012), ‘What stops lone mothers from working?’ Insights from the UK's Millennium Cohort Study. In Mayes D. and Thompson M. (eds), The Costs of Children: Parenting and Democracy in Contemporary Europe, (pp. 129151). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kenjoh E. (2005), ‘New mothers' employment and public policy in the UK, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden, and Japan’, Labour, 19, S1, 549.
Ketende S, Macdonald M and Joshi H. (2010), ‘Neighbourhoods and residential mobility’, In Children of the 21st Century: The first five years, Policy Press: Bristol.
Kiernan K. and Smith K. (2003), ‘Unmarried parenthood: new insights from the Millennium Cohort Study’, Population Trends, 114, 2333.
Laughlin L. (2013), Who's minding the kids? Child care arrangements, U.S. Census Bureau: Washington, D.C.
La Valle I., Finch S., Nove A. and Lewin C. (2000), Parents’ demand for childcare, Department for Education and Employment Research Brief No. 176, DfEE: London.
McKay S. (2004), Lone parents in London: Quantitative analysis of differences in paid work, DWP in-house report no 136, HMSO: London.
Murphy A. (2007), ‘Score tests of normality in bivariate probit models’, Economic Letters, 95, 3, 374379.
Murphy M., Grundy and Shelton N. (1999), ‘Looking beyond the household: Intergenerational perspectives on living kin and contact with kin in Great Britain’, Population Trends 97, 1927.
Plewis I. (2007), The Millennium Cohort Study Technical Report on Sampling, 4th Edition, London: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.
Ruiz S. A. and Silverstein M. (2007), ‘Relationships with grandparents and the emotional well-being of late adolescent and young adult grandchildren’, Journal of Social Issues, 63, 4, 793808.
Saraceno C. and Keck W. (2010), ‘Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe?’, European Societies, 12, 5, 675696.
Sear R. and Coall D. (2011), ‘How much does family matter? Cooperative breeding and the demographic transition’, Population and Development Review, 37, S1, 81112.
Soobedar Z. (2011), ‘A semiparametric analysis of the rising breadwinner role of women in the UK’, Review of the Economics of the Household, 9, 3, 415428.
Staiger D. and Stock J. (1997), ‘Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments’, Econometrica, 65, 3, 557586.
Steinbach A. (2012), ‘Intergenerational relations across the life course’, Advances in Life Course Research, 17(3), 93–99.
Szydlik M. (2012), ‘Generations: Connections across the life course’, Advances in Life Course Research, 17, 3, 100111.
Utrata J. (2011), ‘Youth privilege: Doing age and gender in Russia's single-mother families’, Gender and Society, 25, 5, 616641.
Viitanen T. K. (2005), ‘Cost of childcare and female employment in the UK’, Labour, 19, S1, 149179.
Wheelock J. and Jones K. (2002), ‘Grandparents are the next best thing: Informal childcare for working parents in urban Britain’, Journal of Social Policy, 31, 3, 441463.
Wooldridge J. (2002), Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary Materials

Kanji supplementary material
Appendix 1

 Word (15 KB)
15 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 30 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 244 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 7th November 2017 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.