Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 60
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ben Shlomo, Shirley and Taubman - Ben-Ari, Orit 2016. What factors may assist social workers to promote life satisfaction and personal growth among first-time grandfathers?. Child & Family Social Work, p. n/a.

    Craig, Lyn and Jenkins, Bridget 2016. Grandparental childcare in Australia: gender differences in the correlates of providing regular grandparental care while parents work. Community, Work & Family, Vol. 19, Issue. 3, p. 281.

    Di Gessa, Giorgio Glaser, Karen Price, Debora Ribe, Eloi and Tinker, Anthea 2016. What Drives National Differences in Intensive Grandparental Childcare in Europe?. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, Vol. 71, Issue. 1, p. 141.

    Kim, Hye-Jin Kang, Hyun and Johnson-Motoyama, Michelle 2016. The psychological well-being of grandparents who provide supplementary grandchild care: a systematic review. Journal of Family Studies, p. 1.

    Lyonette, Clare Baldauf, Beate and Behle, Heike 2016. Exploring Resources, Life-Balance and Well-Being of Women Who Work in a Global Context.

    McLean, Caitlin Naumann, Ingela and Koslowski, Alison 2016. Access to Childcare in Europe: Parents' Logistical Challenges in Cross-national Perspective. Social Policy & Administration,

    Taubman – Ben-Ari, Orit Findler, Liora Noy, Adi and Porat-Zyman, Ginna 2016. When grandparents drive their grandchildren. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 39, p. 54.

    Verhoef, Melissa Roeters, Anne and van der Lippe, Tanja 2016. Couples’ Work Schedules and Child-Care Use in the Netherlands. Journal of Child and Family Studies, Vol. 25, Issue. 4, p. 1119.

    Burn, Katherine and Szoeke, Cassandra 2015. Is grandparenting a form of social engagement that benefits cognition in ageing?. Maturitas, Vol. 80, Issue. 2, p. 122.

    Burn, Katherine and Szoeke, Cassandra 2015. Grandparenting predicts late-life cognition: Results from the Women's Healthy Ageing Project. Maturitas, Vol. 81, Issue. 2, p. 317.

    Chan, Tak Wing and Ermisch, John 2015. Residential proximity of parents and their adult offspring in the United Kingdom, 2009–10. Population Studies, Vol. 69, Issue. 3, p. 355.

    Jin, Jang Yong and Kim, Tae-Hee 2015. Current Situation of Postmenopausal Grandmothers Raising Their Grandchildren. Journal of Menopausal Medicine, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 72.

    Skinner, Tina and MacGill, Fiona 2015. Combining Dyslexia and Mothering: Perceived Impacts on Work. Gender, Work & Organization, Vol. 22, Issue. 4, p. 421.

    Ta, Na Kwan, Mei-Po Chai, Yanwei and Liu, Zhilin 2015. Gendered Space-Time Constraints, Activity Participation and Household Structure: A Case Study Using A GPS-Based Activity Survey in Suburban Beijing, China. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie, p. n/a.

    Weldon-Johns, Michelle 2015. From modern workplaces to modern families – re-envisioning the work–family conflict. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 395.

    Ben Shlomo, Shirley 2014. What Makes New Grandparents Satisfied with Their Lives?. Stress and Health, Vol. 30, Issue. 1, p. 23.

    Tanskanen, Antti and Rotkirch, Anna 2014. The impact of grandparental investment on mothers’ fertility intentions in four European countries. Demographic Research, Vol. 31, p. 1.

    Taubman - Ben-Ari, Orit Ben Shlomo, Shirley and Findler, Liora 2014. First-Time Parents’ and Grandparents’ Perceptions of Personal Growth: A Dyadic Approach. Journal of Family Social Work, Vol. 17, Issue. 3, p. 229.

    Gallagher, Aisling 2013. The Politics of Childcare Provisioning: A Geographical Perspective. Geography Compass, Vol. 7, Issue. 2, p. 161.

    Julia Rouse, Lorna Treanor and Dr E, Dr and Forson, Cynthia 2013. Contextualising migrant black business women ' s work-life balance experiences. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 19, Issue. 5, p. 460.


‘Grandparents Are the Next Best Thing’: Informal Childcare for Working Parents in Urban Britain

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 July 2002

This article is based on a unique empirical investigation of the contribution that informal childcare – relatives, friends or neighbours looking after children, usually on an unpaid basis – makes in allowing parents to go out to work. There has been little research on either the use of such complementary childcare by parents, or of the carers who undertake it, and this is a review of a two-stage investigation of both. One of the earliest initiatives of the Labour government elected in 1997 was to put a National Childcare Strategy in place. The strategy recognised the importance of childcare both for the development of children and in enabling parents – particularly mothers – to go out to work. To date, however, childcare needs and provision have been assessed almost entirely in terms of formal childcare. A clear understanding of why working parents use complementary childcare (particularly from grandparents) is essential for any childcare policy that hopes to be attuned to what families actually want. The article argues that policy makers, lured by a simplistic vision of economic vitality into adopting a behavioural paradigm from economics – in which parents are assumed to respond to purely financial incentives – are likely to find themselves distracted from important issues of the social well-being of working families with children. Childcare needs are related to dramatic changes in women's labour market participation over recent years, where the largest increase in female employment has been among mothers of children under the age of five. Neither mothers nor fathers may be in a position to provide the desired amount of childcare inside the nuclear household. This situation gives rise to the possibility of a ‘childcare deficit’. In failing to acknowledge and underpin the value which parents place upon complementary forms of childcare, policy makers are in danger of committing themselves to institutional arrangements which may make that deficit worse in the longer term.

Hide All
With thanks to Tyneside TEC/DfEE and the four Tyneside Early Years Development and Childcare Partnerships of Newcastle, Gateshead and North and South Tyneside for funding the empirical work on which this paper is based. We would also like to thank the other members of the research team for their invaluable contributions: Diane Jones, Maggie Thomson, Peter McCarthy and Michael Anderson, as well as Lesley Hall. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors alone. We are very grateful to all the respondents who gave so generously of their time. Names have been changed to preserve anonymity.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *