Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T01:38:53.627Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Leaving the Parental Home: An Analysis of Early Housing Careers*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Gill Jones
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Patterns of leaving home vary between classes in terms of the reason for the move, its timing, reversibility of the process, and the type of accommodation entered on leaving the family of origin. The association between leaving home and marriage is seen to be weakening as more young people move into single independent housing prior to marriage. The notion of transitional housing is raised, and it is argued that there will be an increasing demand for such housing, characterised by suitable accommodation for the single, geographically mobile young. The study draws upon evidence in the General Household Survey and the National Child Development Study.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Social Policy , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 1987 , pp. 49 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allen, S. (1968), ‘Some theoretical problems in the study of youth’, The Sociological Review, 16:3, 319–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M. (1971), Family Structure in Nineteenth Century Lancashire, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Anderson, M. (1983), ‘What is new about the modern family: an historical perspective’, in The Family, British Society for Population Studies Conference, University of Bath, 14–16 09 1983, OPCS Occasional Paper 31.Google Scholar
Building Societies Association (1985), ‘An international comparison of housing tenure by age’, BSA Bulletin, 43. 7–11.Google Scholar
Dunnell, K. (1979). Family Formation 1976, OPCS Social Survey Division, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Harris, C.C. (1983), The Family and Industrial Society, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Haskey, J. (1983), ‘Social class patterns of marriage’, Population Trends 34, HMSO, London, 12–19.Google Scholar
Ineichen, B. (1981), ‘The housing decisions of young people’, British Journal of Sociology, 32:2, 252–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, G.E. (1986a), ‘Youth in the Social Structure: Transitions to Adulthood and their Stratification by Class and Gender,’ PhD Dissertation, University of Surrey, 1986.Google Scholar
Jones, G.E. (1986b), ‘Stratification in Youth’, paper presented to the British Sociological Association Annual Conference, Loughborough, 03 24–27.Google Scholar
Kiernan, K.E. (1983), ‘The structure of families today: continuity or change?’ in The Family, British Society for Population Studies Conference, University of Bath,14–1609, Occasional Paper No. 31, OPCS, London.Google Scholar
Kiernan, K.E. (1985), ‘The departure of children: the timing of leaving home over the life cycles of parents and children’, CPS Research Paper 85–3, Centre for Population Studies, London.Google Scholar
Kiernan, K.E. and Eldridge, S. (1985), ‘A demographic analysis of flrst marriages in England and Wales: 1940–1985’, CPS Research Paper 85–1, Centre for Population Studies, London.Google Scholar
Laslett, P. (1971), The World We Have Lost, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Leonard, D. (1980), Sex and Generation: a Study of Courtship and Weddings, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
Modell, J. and Hareven, T.K. (1973), ‘Urbanisation and the malleable household: boarding and lodging in American families’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 35, 467–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, M.J. and Sullivan, O. (1983), ‘Housing Tenure and Fertility in Post-War Britain’, CPS Research Paper 83–2, Centre for Population Studies, London.Google Scholar
National Children's Bureau (1981), National Child Development Study, Sweeps I–IV.Google Scholar
Iyer, R. (1984), ‘National Child Development Study: analysis of response’. Working Paper No. 25, National Children's Bureau.Google Scholar
Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys (1979), General Household Survey 1979, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Office of Population, Censuses and Surveys (1980), General Household Survey 1980, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Payne, J. and Payne, G. (1977), ‘Housing pathways and stratification: a study of life chances in the housing market’, Journal of Social Policy, 6:2, 129–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauta, I. (1986), Who would prefer separate accommodation?, OPCS Social Survey Division, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Saunders, P. (1982), ‘Beyond housing classes: the sociological significance of private property rights in means of consumption’, Working Paper No. 33, University of Sussex (mimeo).Google Scholar
Shepherd, P. (1985), ‘The National Child Development Study: an introduction to the background of the study and the methods of data collection’, Working Paper No. 1, NCDS User Support Group. City University.Google Scholar
Wallace, C. (1986), ‘From generation to generation: the effects of employment and unemployment upon the domestic life cycle of young adults’, paper presented to the British Sociological Association Annual Conference, Loughborough,24–2703.Google Scholar
Wall, R. (1978), ‘The age at leaving home’, Journal of Family History, 3:2, 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, C.M. (1974), ‘Ages, reasons and sex differences for children leaving home: observations from survey data for Australia’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 769–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, C.M. (1975), ‘Factors associated with the timing and duration of the leaving-home stage of the life cycle’, Population Studies, 29, 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, C.M. (1984), ‘Leaving home and returning home: a demographic study of young adults in Australia’, Australian Family Research Conference Proceedings (Canberra. 23–25 November 1983), Vol 1: Family Formation, Structure, Values, pp.53–76.Google Scholar