Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Marketisation of Nordic Eldercare – Is the Model Still Universal?

  • LINDA MOBERG (a1)
Abstract
Abstract

The objective of this article is to analyse whether the increased reliance on marketisation in the provision of social care challenges the universality of eldercare in Sweden, Denmark, Finland and Norway. The study focuses on national reforms for contracting out and user choice of provider, analysing their consequences for four universalistic dimensions: (i) equal inclusion, (ii) public funding, (iii) public provision and (iv) comprehensive usage. The findings suggest that, although need-based inclusion and public funding remain key principles in all four countries, there is an increased reliance on private provision in Sweden, Denmark and Finland. In addition, the introduction of topping-up services challenges the dimension of comprehensive usage by enabling users with economic resources to turn to the private market to increase the comprehensiveness and quality of their care.

Copyright
References
Hide All
AnttonenA. (2002), ‘Universalism and social policy: a Nordic-feminist revaluation’, NORA: Nordic Journal of Women's Studies, 10:2, 3741.
AnttonenA. and HäikiöL. (2011), ‘Care “going market”: Finnish elderly-care policies in transition’, Nordic Journal of Social Research, Special issue, 7090.
AnttonenA., HäikiöL. and StefánssonK. (eds.) (2012a), Welfare State, Universalism and Diversity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
AnttonenA., HäikiöL., StefánssonK. and SipiläJ. (2012b), ‘Universalism and the challenge of diversity’, in Anttonen A., Häikiö L., and Stefánsson K. (eds.), Welfare State, Universalism and Diversity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 115.
AnttonenA. and SipiläJ. (2012), ‘Universalism in the British and Scandinavian social policy debates’, in Anttonen A., Häikiö L., and Stefánsson K. (eds.), Welfare State, Universalism and Diversity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1641.
BélandD., BlomqvistP., Goul-AndersenJ., PalmeJ. and WaddanA. (2014), ‘The universal decline of universality? Social policy change in Canada, Denmark, Sweden and the UK’, Social Policy & Administration, 48:7, 739–56.
BertelsenT.M. and RostgaardT. (2013), ‘Marketisation in eldercare in Denmark: free choice and the quest for quality and efficiency’, in Meagher G. and Szebehely M. (eds.), Marketisation in Nordic Eldercare. Stockholm: Stockholm University, pp. 127–61.
BlomqvistP. (2016), ‘NPM i välfärdsstaten: hotas universalismen?’, Statsvetenskaplig tidskrift, 118:1, 3967.
BlomqvistP. and PalmeJ. (2015), ‘Universalism in Swedish Welfare Policy 1990–2014’, Paper presented to the RC19-conference, Bath 26–28 August 2015.
BradyH. E. and CollierD. (2010), Rethinking Social Inquiry - Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield Publisher.
DalyM. and LewisJ. (2000), ‘The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary welfare states’, The British journal of sociology, 51:2, 281–98.
ErlandssonS., StormP., StranzA., SzebehelyM. and TrydegårdG.B. (2013), ‘Marketising trends in Swedish eldercare: completion, choice and calls for stricter regulation’, in Meagher G. and Szebehely M. (eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare, Stockholm: Stockholm University, pp. 2383.
Esping-AndersenG. (1990), The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge: Polity Press.
FernandezJ.L., KendallJ., DaveyV. and KnappM.R.J. (2007), ‘Direct payments in England: Factors linked to variations in local provision’, Journal of Social Policy, 36:01, 97121.
Goul-AndersenJ. (2012), ‘The Concept of Universalism and its Operationalization in a Mixed Economy of Welfare’, CCWS Working paper no. 2012–81, Aalborg.
JordahlH. and ÖhrvallR. (2013), ’Nationella reformer och lokala initiativ’, in Jordahl H. (ed.), Välfärdstjänster i privat regi: framväxt och drivkrafter, Stockholm: SNS, pp. 3387.
KarsioO. and AnttonenA. (2013), ‘Marketisation of eldercare in Finland: legal frames, outsourcing practices and the rapid growth of for-profit services’, in Meagher G. and Szebehely M. (eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare. Stockholm: Stockholm University, pp. 85125.
KildalN. and KuhnleS. (2005a), Normative Foundations of the Welfare State: the Nordic Experience, New York: Routledge.
KildalN. and KuhnleS. (2005b), ‘The principle of universalism: tracing a key idea in the Scandinavian welfare model’, in Standing G. (ed.), Promoting Income Security as a Right: Europe and North America, London: Anthem Press, pp. 303–26.
KorpiW. and PalmeJ. (1998), ‘The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the western countries’, American Sociological Review, 63:5, 661–87.
FoU KS. (2013), Friere Brukervalg i Hjemmetjenesten, Slutrapport 12.04.2013.
Le GrandJ. and BartlettW. (1993), Quasi-markets and social policy, London: Macmillan Press.
MarshallT.H. (1964), Class, Citizenship and Social Development, New York: Doubleday.
MeagherG. and SzebehelyM. (eds.) (2013), Marketisation in Nordic Eldercare, Stockholm: Stockholm University.
National Board of Health and Welfare (2015), Äldre och Personer med Funktionsnedsättning – Regiform År 2014, Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen.
NHO Service (2012), Omsorgstjenester, Bransjestatistikk 2012.
ØienH., KarlssonM. and IversenT. (2012), ‘The impact of financial incentives on the composition of long-term care in Norway’, Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, 34:2, 258–74.
PollittC. and BouckhaertG. (2011), Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
RauchD. (2007), ‘Is there really a Scandinavian social service model? A comparison of childcare and eldercare in six European countries’, Acta Sociologica, 50:3, 249–69.
RostgaardT. (2011), ‘Care as you like it: the construction of a consumer approach in home care in Denmark’, Nordic Journal of Social Research, Special Issue, 5469.
SipiläJ. (ed.) (1997), Social Care Services: The Key to the Scandinavian Model, Aldershot: Avebury.
StevensM., GlendinningC., JacobsS., MoranN., ChallisD., ManthorpeJ., FernandezJ.L., JonesK., KnappM., NettenA. and WilberforceM. (2011), ‘Assessing the Role of Increasing Choice in English Social Care Services’, Journal of Social Policy, 40:02, 257–74.
Swedish Association for Local Authorities (2004), Kommunernas Marknadsanvändning År 2002, Stockholm: Svenska Kommunförbundet.
Swedish Competition Agency (2015), Siffror och fakta om offentlig upphandling, Stockholm: Konkurrensverket.
Swedish Competition Agency (2013), Kommunernas Valfrihetssystem – med Focus på Hemtjänsten, Stockholm: Konkurrensverket.
SzebehelyM. and TrydegårdG.B. (2012), ‘Home care for older people in Sweden: a universal model in transition’, Health & social care in the community, 20:3, 300–09.
Taylor-GoobyP. (2008), ‘Choice and Values: Individualised Rational Action and Social Goals’, Journal of Social Policy, 37:02, 167–85.
TitmussR.M. (1976), ‘Universal and selective social services’, In Titmuss R.M. (ed.), Commitment to Welfare, London: Georg Allen & Unwin, pp. 113–23.
TrydegårdG.B. (2001), ‘Välfärdstjänster till salu - privatisering och alternativa driftsformer under 1990-talet’, in Szebehely M. (ed.), Välfärdstjänster i Omvandling, Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer, pp. 77140.
VaboS.I. and BurauV. (2011), ‘Universalism and the local organisation of elderly care’, International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31:3/4, 173–84.
VabøM. (2006), ‘Caring for people or caring for proxy consumers?’, European Societies, 8:3, 403–22.
VabøM., ChristensenK., Fadnes JacobsenF. and Dalby TrættebergH. (2013), ‘Marketisation in Norwegian eldercare: preconditions, trends and resistance’, in Meagher G. and Szebehely M. (eds.), Marketisation in Nordic eldercare, Stockholm: Stockholm University, pp. 163202.
VabøM. and SzebehelyM. (2012), ‘A caring state for all older people?’, in Anttonen A., Häikiö L., and Stefánsson K. (eds.), Welfare State, Universalism and Diversity, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 121–43.
VuorenkoskiL. (2009), Vouchers in social and health care - follow up 2, Health Policy Monitor. Available at http://hpm.org/fi/a13/1.pdf (2016-10-28)
Governmental bill (2008), Regeringens proposition 2008/09:29 Lag om valfrihetssystem.
Governmental bill (1992), Regeringens proposition 1992/93:43 Ökad konkurrens i kommunal verksamhet
SFS 2001:453, Socialtjänstlagen
SFS 2008:962, Lag om valfrihetssystem
Act 399 06/06/2002, Lov om ændring af lov om social service
Act 329 18/05/2005, Lov om ændring af lov om social service
Act 550 18/06/2012, Lov om frikommuner
Act 326 23/03/2013, Lov om ændring af lov om social service
Act 150 16/02/2015, Serviceloven
Act 23.12.1992/1505, Laki julkisista hankinnoista (lag om offentlig upphandling)
Act 24.7.2009/569, Laki sosiaali- ja terveydenhuollon palvelusetelistä (lag om servicesedlar inom social- och hälsovården)
Governmental Bill (2009) Hallituksen esitys Eduskunnalle 20/2009: laeiksi sosiaali- ja terveyden-huollon palvelusetelistä (Regeringes proposition till Riksdagen 20/2009: Förslag till lag om servicesedlar inom social- och hälsovården)
Act 1999-07-16-69, Lov om offentlige anskaffelser
Act 2011-06-24-30, Helseog omsorgstjenesteloven
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 116 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 419 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 21st December 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.