Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T07:40:05.049Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postmodernism and Social Policy: A Great Leap Backwards?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2009

Abstract

Postmodernism claims that the universalist themes of modern society (society-wide political ideologies, the nation-state, the theme of rational planning in government policy, the large-scale public or private sector bureaucracy) are obsolete, to be replaced by a plural interest in diversity and choice. These ideas have strong implications for both the theory of social policy, which typically stresses universal themes of inequality and privilege, and the practice of social policy, which relies on rational analysis to inform society-wide government provision. This article suggests that such an approach ignores the significance of market liberalism and the associated trends to inequality, privatisation, retrenchment and the regulation of the poorest groups. From this perspective, postmodernism functions as an ideological smokescreen, preventing us from recognising some of the most important trends in modern social policy. It is unfortunate if, at a time when the results of increasing inequality are everywhere apparent, one of the dominant approaches in social science obscures the issue.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, A. (1993), Beveridge, the National Minimum and its Future in a European Context, Welfare State Programme Paper, no. 85, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
Baldock, J. (1993), ‘Patterns of change in the delivery of welfare in Europe’, in Taylor-Gooby, P. and Lawson, R. (eds.) Markets and Managers: New Issues in the Delivery of Welfare, Open University Press. Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Bauman, Z. (1987). Legislators and Interpreters, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Beck, U. (1992), Risk Society, Sage. London.Google Scholar
Bell, D. (1974). The Coming of Post-industrial Society. Heineman, London.Google Scholar
Berman, M. (1985), All that is Solid Melts into Air: The Experience of Modernity, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Boyne, R. and Rattansi, A. (1990), ‘The theory and politics of postmodernism’, in Postmodernism and Society, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Coote, A. (1992). The Welfare of Citizens, Institute of Public Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
Crook, S., Pakulski, J. and Waters, M. (1992), Postmodernism – Change in Advanced Society, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Deacon, B. (1993), International Institutions and Social Policy in East Europe, paper presented at the International Sociological Association Poverty Group workshop in Oxford, September.Google Scholar
Dean, H. (1990), Social Security and Social Control, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
Department of Social Security (DSS) (1993), Households Below Average Income, 1979/80 – 1990/91, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Doyal, L. and Gough, I. (1991), A Theory of Human Need, Macmillan. London.Google Scholar
European Union (1993a). European Social Policy Outcomes for the Union, COM (93) 551, Brussels.Google Scholar
European Union (1993b), Employment in Europe, Brussels.Google Scholar
Foster, H. (ed.) (1985). Postmodern Culture, Pluto Press, London.Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (1989). ‘The end of history’, National Interest, 16, (Summer), 318.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1990), The Social Consequences of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1992), The Transformation of Intimacy, Polity Press. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Gorz, A. (1985), Paths to Paradise: On the Liberation from Work, Pluto Press, London.Google Scholar
Graham, C. (1991), Privatising Public Enterprises, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. (1985), ‘Modernity – an incomplete project’, in Foster, H. (ed.) Postmodern Culture, London. Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Handy, C. (1984), The Future of Work, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. (1980), The Condition of Postmodernity, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
Hewitt, M. (1992), Welfare. Ideology and Need, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Harlow.Google Scholar
Hewitt, M. (1993). ‘Social movements and social need: problems with postmodern political theory’, Critical Social Policy, 37, Summer.Google Scholar
Hoggett, P. (1990), Modernisation, Political Strategy and the Welfare State, Studies in Decentralisation and Quasi-markets, no. 2, School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Jones, B. (1982), Sleepers Awakel Technology and the Future of Work, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Kanter, R. (1985), The Change Masters: Corporate Entrepreneurs at Work, Counterpoint, Unwin Paperbacks, London.Google Scholar
Keane, J. and Owens, J. (1986), After Full Employment, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. and Mouffe, C. (1985), Hegemony and Social Stratification, Verso, London.Google Scholar
Lane, J-E. and Ersson, S. (1991), Politics and Society in Western Europe, Sage, London.Google Scholar
Larrain, J. (1979), The Concept of Ideology, Hutchinson, London.Google Scholar
Lash, S. and Urry, J. (1987), The End of Organised Capitalism, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. (1990), Quasi-markets and Social Policy, Studies in Decentralisation and Quasi-markets, no 1, School for Advanced Urban Studies, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. and Bartlett, W. (1993), Quasi-markets and Social Policy, Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
Le Grand, J. and Estrin, S. (1989), Market Socialism, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Letwin, O. (1991), Privatising the World, Cassell, London.Google Scholar
Lyotard, J-F. (1984), The Postmodern Condition: a Report on Knowledge, Manchester University Press, Manchester.Google Scholar
McLellan, D. (1986), Ideology, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Miller, S. and Peroni, F. (1992), ‘Social politics and the Citizens' Charter’, in Manning, N. and Page, R. (eds.) Social Policy Review 4, Social Policy Association, University of Kent.Google Scholar
OECD (1989), Employment Outlook (July). OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
Offe, C. (1991), Towards a Non-productivist Perspective on Welfare, paper presented at the Anglo-German Conference on Social Policy, University of Nottingham, September.Google Scholar
Oxley, H. and Martin, J. (1991), ‘Controlling government spending and deficits: trends in the 1980s and prospects for the 1990s’, OECD Economic Studies, 17 (Autumn).Google Scholar
Pierson, C. (1991), Beyond the Welfare State?, Polity Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Piore, M. and Sabel, C. (1984), The Second Industrial Divide, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
Pixley, J. (1993), Citizenship and Employment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Prime Minister's Office (1991), The Citizens' Charter – Raising the Standard, cm 1599, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
Putnam, H. (1991), Renewing Philosophy, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Rorty, R. (1991), ‘Postmodernist bourgeois liberalism’ in Objectivity, Relativism and Truth, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Taylor, I. (1990), The Social Effects of Free Market Policies: An International Text, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.Google Scholar
Taylor-Gooby, P. and Lawson, R. (1993) (eds.), Markets and Managers: New Issues in the Delivery of Welfare, Open University Press, Milton Keynes.Google Scholar
Touraine, A. (1971), The Postmodern Society, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
Touraine, A. (1981), The Voice and the Eye, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Turner, B. (1986), Citizenship and Capitalism, George Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Turner, B. (1992), From History to Modernity, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
United Nations (1991), World Economic Survey for 1991, UN, New York.Google Scholar
Veljanovski, C. (1989), Selling the State, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1930), The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, Unwin, London.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1964), The Sociology of Religion, Beacon Books, Boston.Google Scholar
Williams, F. (1992), ‘Somewhere over the rainbow’, in Manning, N. and Page, R. (eds.) Social Policy Review, 4, Social Policy Association, University of Kent.Google Scholar