Adler, M. (2003), ‘A socio-legal approach to administrative justice’, Law & Policy, 25: 4, 323–352.
Adler, M. (2006), ‘Fairness in context’, Journal of Law and Society, 33: 4, 615–638.
Adler, M. (2013), ‘Conditionality, sanctions, and the weakness of redress mechanisms in the British “new deal”’, in Brodkin, E. Z. and Marston, G. (Eds.), Work and the welfare state, Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Andersen, N. A., Caswell, D. and Larsen, F. (2016), ‘Innovation of employment services for vulnerable groups: the case of Denmark’, conference paper for ‘Changing Labour Markets: Challenges for Welfare and Labour Market Policy’, Linnaeus University, Växjö, Sweden, December 7–9.
Anderson, E. (1999), ‘What is the point of equality?’ Ethics, 109: 2, 287–337.
Blair, T. and Schröder, G. (1998), Europe: the Third Way/die Neue Mitte. Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, working documents, 2.
Bonvin, J.-M. and Farvaque, N. (2007), ‘A capability approach to individualised and tailor-made activation’, in van Berkel, R. and Valkenburg, B. (Eds.), Making it personal: individualising activation services in the EU, Bristol: Polity Press.
Bradshaw, P. (2016), ‘Ken Loach's welfare state polemic is blunt, dignified and brutally moving’, The Guardian, 12 May.
Cantillon, B. and Van Lancker, W. (2012), ‘Solidarity and reciprocity in the social investment state: what can be learned from the case of Flemish school allowances and truancy?’ Journal of Social Policy, 41: 4, 657–675.
Caswell, D. and Høybye-Mortensen, M. (2015), Responses from the frontline: how organisations and street-level bureaucrats deal with economic sanctions. European Journal of Social Security, 17: 1, 31–51.
Dean, H. (2003), ‘The Third Way and social welfare: the myth of post-emotionalism’, Social Policy & Administration, 37: 7, 695–708.
Dermine, E. and Dumont, D. (2014), Activation policies for the unemployed: the right to work and the duty to work, Brussels: Peter Lang.
Darwall, S. (2006), The second-person standpoint, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dworkin, R. (2000), Sovereign virtue, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Engbersen, G., Schuyt, K., Timmer, J. and van Waarden, F. (1993), Cultures of unemployment: a comparative look at long-term unemployment and urban poverty, Oxford: Westview Press.
Ervik, R., Kildal, N. and Nilssen, E. (Eds.) (2015), New contractualism in European welfare state policies, Farnham: Ashgate.
Friedli, L. and Stearn, R. (2015), ‘Positive affect as coercive strategy: conditionality, activation and the role of psychology in UK government workfare programmes’, Critical Medical Humanities, 41: 1, 40–47.
Garthwaite, K. (2014), ‘Fear of the brown envelope: exploring welfare reform with long-term sickness benefit recipients’, Social Policy & Administration, 48: 7, 782–798.
Giddens, A. (1994), Beyond left and right, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1998), The Third Way, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Gjersøe, H. M. (2016), ‘Regulating inflow or outflow: a comparison of the work capability assessments in the UK and Norway,’ Journal of Social Policy, 45: 1, 141–158.
Griggs, J. and Evans, M. (2010), ‘Sanctions within conditional benefit systems: a review of evidence’, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Kaufmann, M. (2013), Kein Recht auf Faulheit [No right to be lazy], Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien.
Lødemel, I. and Moreira, A. (Eds.) (2014), Activation or workfare: governance and the neo-liberal convergence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lødemel, I. and Trickey, H. (Eds.) (2000), ‘An offer you can't refuse’: workfare in international perspective. Bristol: Policy Press
Mashaw, J. L. (1983), Bureaucratic justice: managing social security disability claims, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Mead, L. (1986), Beyond entitlement: the social obligations of citizenship, New York: The Free Press.
Molander, A. and Torsvik, G. (2015), ‘Getting people into work: what (if anything) can justify mandatory activation of welfare recipients?’ Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32: 4, 373–392.
Newman, I. (2011), ‘Work as a route out of poverty: a critical evaluation of the UK welfare to work policy’, Policy Studies, 32: 2, 91–108.
Nilssen, E. (2015), ‘Contractualism and street-level discretion in Norwegian activation policy’, in Ervik, R., Kildal, N. and Nilssen, E. (Eds.), New contractualism in European welfare state policies (pp. 73–92), Farnham: Ashgate.
Patrick, R. (2016), Living with and responding to the ‘scrounger’ narrative in the UK: exploring everyday strategies of acceptance, resistance and deflection. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice, 24: 3, 245–249.
Paz-Fuchs, A. (2008), Welfare to work: conditional rights in social policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rafass, T. (2017), ‘Demanding activation’, Journal of Social Policy, 46: 2, 349–365.
Reeves, A. and Loopstra, R. (2017), ‘Set up to fail?’ How welfare conditionality undermines citizenship for vulnerable groups, Social Policy and Society, 16: 2, 327–338.
Røed, K. (2012), ‘Active social insurance’, IZA Journal of Labor Policy, 1: 8, 1–22.
Scanlon, T. M. (1998), What we owe to each other, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Schmidt, V. A. (2002), ‘Does discourse matter in the politics of welfare state adjustment?’ Comparative Political Studies, 35: 2, 168–193.
Spies, H. and van Berkel, R. (2001), ‘Workfare in the Netherlands’: young unemployed people and the Jobseeker's Allowance Act’ in Lødemel, I. and Trickey, H. (Eds.), ‘An offer you can't refuse: workfare in international perspective (pp. 105–132), Bristol: Policy Press.
Strawson, P. F. (2008), Freedom and resentment and other essays, Abingdon: Routledge.
Terum, L. I., Torsvik, G. and Øverbye, G. (2017), ‘Når vilkår og aktivitetskrav brytes: frontlinjearbeideres tilnærming til sanksjoner’ [When conditions and mandatory activation are breached: frontline workers attitudes to sanctions], Søkelys på arbeidslivet, 34: 3, 147–166.
Watson, G. (2004), Agency and answerability, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wolff, J. (2015), ‘Political philosophy and the real world of the welfare state’, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32: 4, 360–372.
Wright, S. (2016), ‘Conceptualising the active welfare subject: welfare reform in discourse, policy and lived experience’, Policy & Politics, 44: 2, 235–252.