Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Social Division of Welfare Surveillance

  • PAUL HENMAN (a1) and GREG MARSTON (a1)

Electronic surveillance has grown rapidly in recent years. Despite this, surveillance practices and their social products are yet to receive serious attention in the academic field of social policy. Extending Titmuss’ classical articulation of the social division of welfare, this article develops the notion of the social division of welfare surveillance to point to the way in which surveillance, compliance burdens and risk management unevenly operate within society. The implications for reinforcing social divisions and critical social policy analysis are discussed.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M. Adler and P. Henman (2005), ‘Computerising the welfare state: an international comparison of computerisation in social security’, Information, Communication and Society, 8: 3, 315–42.

K. Ball and D. Wilson (2000), ‘Power, control and computer based performance monitoring’, Organization Studies, 21: 4, 539–66.

A. Barnes (2004), ‘Diaries, dunnies and discipline’, Labour and Industry, 14: 3, 127–37.

M. Bovens and S. Zouridis (2002), ‘From street-level to system-level bureaucracies’, Public Administration Review, 62: 2, 174–84.

L. Bryson (1992), Welfare and the State, New York: St Martin's Press.

A. Deacon (2003), ‘Levelling the playing field, activating the players’, Policy and Politics, 31: 2, 123–37.

H. Dean (2005), Social Policy, Bristol: Polity Press.

P. Dornan and J. Hudson (2003), ‘Welfare governance in the surveillance society: a positive-realistic cybercriticalist view’, Social Policy and Administration, 37: 5, 468–82.

T. Fitzpatrick (2000), ‘Critical cyber policy: network technologies, massless citizens, virtual rights’, Critical Social Policy, 20: 3, 375407.

N. Fraser and L. Gordon (1994), ‘A genealogy of dependency: tracing a keyword of the welfare state’, Signs, 19: 309–36.

N. Gilbert (2002), Transformation of the Welfare State, New York: Oxford University Press.

S. Graham and D. Wood (2003), ‘Digitizing surveillance’, Critical Social Policy, 23: 2, 227–48.

P. Henman (2004), ‘Targeted!: population segmentation, electronic surveillance and governing the unemployed in Australia’, International Sociology, 19: 2, 173–91.

P. Henman (2005), ‘E-government, targeting and data profiling: policy and ethical issues of differential treatment’, Journal of E-government, 2: 1, 7998.

P. Henman and M. Adler (2003), ‘Information technology and the governance of social security’, Critical Social Policy, 23: 2, 139–64.

P. Holland , A. Pyman and J. Teicher (2005), ‘Negotiating the contested terrain of drug testing in the Australian workplace’, Journal of Industrial Relations, 47: 3, 326–38.

C. McDonald , G. Marston and A. Buckley (2003), ‘Risk technology in Australia: the role of the job seeker classification instrument in employment services’, Critical Social Policy, 23: 498525.

P. Pierson (ed.) (2001), The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

M. Sparke (2006), ‘A neoliberal nexus’, Political Geography, 25: 2, 151–80.

S. Speak and S. Graham (1999), ‘Service not included’, Environment and Planning A 31: 19852001.

F. Williams (1999), ‘Good enough principles for welfare’, Journal of Social Policy, 28: 4, 667–87.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 18
Total number of PDF views: 147 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 409 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 30th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.