Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Start Up and Sustainability: Marketisation and the Social Enterprise Investment Fund in England

  • KELLY HALL (a1), PETE ALCOCK (a2) and ROSS MILLAR (a3)
Abstract
Abstract

Since the end of the last century governments in many western welfare regimes have been keen to promote the marketisation of public service delivery. This requires changes in the supply of, and demand for, alternative providers in this market, and in particular for many governments this has included third sector providers. This article examines the attempt by the UK Labour government to promote the supply of social enterprises in the market for health and social care services in England, through the Social Enterprise Investment Fund (SEIF), introduced in 2007. The article reports on research evaluating the effectiveness of the SEIF, employing a ‘theories of change’ approach, drawing on a mix of administrative and survey data, qualitative interviews and case studies. The research found that although the SEIF had significant benefits in supporting the start up and growth of organisations, its contribution to their longer-term sustainability was more mixed as most were dependent on grants as a main source of income and were not in a position to compete for public sector contracts. This suggests that there may be limits to the role that public investment can play in such market making.

Copyright
Corresponding author
email: p.c.alcock@bham.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Addicott R. (2011), Social Enterprise in Health Care: Promoting Organisational Autonomy and Staff Engagement, London: The Kings Fund.
Alcock P., Brannelly T. and Ross L. (2004), Formality or Flexibility? Voluntary Sector Contracting in Social Care and Health, London: National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO) and the Countryside Agency.
Alcocks P., Millar R., Hall K., Lyon F., Nicholls A. and Gabriel M. (forthcoming), Start Up and Growth: National Evaluation of the Social Enterprise Investment Fund (SEIF), Report to the Department of Health Policy Research Programme.
Billis D. (2010), ‘From welfare bureaucracies to welfare hybrids’, in Billis D. (ed.), Hybrid Organisations and the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Birckmayer J. D. and Weiss C. H. (2000), ‘Theory-based evaluation practice: what do we learn?’, Evaluation Review, 24: 4, 407–31.
Carmel E. and Harlock J. (2008), ‘Instituting the “third sector” as a governable terrain: partnership, performance and procurement in the UK’, Policy and Politics, 36: 2, 155–71.
Chapman T., Brown J. and Crow R. (2008), ‘Entering a brave new world? An assessment of third sector readiness to tender for the delivery of public services in the United Kingdom’, Policy Studies, 29: 1, 117.
Clark J., Kane D., Wilding K. and Bass P. (2012), The UK Civil Society Almanac 2012, London: National Council of Voluntary Organisations (NCVO).
Connell J. and Kubisch A. (1998), ‘Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiative: progress, prospects and problems’, in Fulbright-Anderson K., Kubsich A. and Connell J. (eds.), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Vol. 2, Theory, Measurement and Analysis, Washington, DC: Aspen Institute.
Dart R. (2004), ‘The legitimacy of social enterprise’, Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 14: 4, 411–24.
Dees J. G. and Anderson B. B. (2003), ‘Sector bending: blurring lines between nonprofit and for profit’, Society, May/June 2003.
Department for Trade and Industry (DTI) (2002), Social Enterprise: A Strategy for Success, London: DTI.
Department of Health (2009), Transforming Health and Social Care: The Social Enterprise Investment Fund, London: The Stationery Office.
Department of Health (2010), Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS, London: The Stationery Office.
Department of Health (2011), Liberating the NHS: Greater Choice and Control – Government Response, Extending Patient Choice of Provider (Any Qualified Provider), London: The Stationery Office.
Eikenberry A. (2009), ‘Refusing the market: a democratic discourse for voluntary and nonprofit organizations’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38: 4, 582–96.
Eikenberry A. and Kluver J. (2004), ‘The marketisation of the nonprofit sector: civil society at risk?’, Public Administration Review, 64: 2, 132–40.
Greenhalgh T., Humphrey C., Hughes J., Macfarlane F., Butler C. and Pawson R. (2009), ‘How do you modernize a health service? A realist evaluation of whole-scale transformation in London’, Milbank Quarterly, 87: 2, 391416.
Haugh H. and Kitson M. (2007), ‘The Third Way and the third sector: New Labour's economic policy and the social economy’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31: 6, 973–94.
Treasury HM (2002), The Role of the Voluntary and Community Sector in Service Delivery: A Cross Cutting Review, London: HM Treasury.
Kerlin J. and Pollak T. (2010), ‘Nonprofit commercial revenue: a replacement for declining government grants and contributions?’, American Review of Public Administration, 41: 6, 686704.
Lyon F., Gabriel M. and Millar R. (2010), The Social Enterprise Investment Fund, Phase One: Scoping, Review and Methodology Development, Third Sector Research Centre and Health Services Management Centre, http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=sMTQx4DnXYM%3d&tabid=757.
Lyon F. and Ramsden M. (2006), ‘Developing fledgling social enterprises? A study of the support required and means of delivering it’, Social Enterprise Journal, 2: 1, 2741.
Macmillan R. (2007), ‘Understanding the idea of “grant dependency” in the voluntary and community sector’, People, Place and Policy Online, 1: 1, 30–8.
Macmillan R. (2010), The Third Sector Delivering Public Services: An Evidence Review, Working Paper 20, Third Sector Research Centre, http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/Publications/tabid/500/Default.aspx.
Margetts H., Six P. and Hood C. (2010)), Paradoxes of Modernization: Unintended Consequences Of Public Policy Reform, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Marmot M. (2010), Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review, London: The Marmot Review, http://www.instituteofhealthequity.org/Content/FileManager/pdf/fairsocietyhealthylives.pdf.
McKay S., Moro D., Teasdale S. and Clifford D. (2011), The Marketisation of Charities in England and Wales, Working Paper 69, Third Sector Research Centre, http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/Publications/tabid/500/Default.aspx.
Milbourne L. (2009), ‘Remodelling the third sector: advancing collaboration or competition in community-based initiatives?’, Journal of Social Policy, 38: 2, 277–98.
Miles M. B. and Huberman A. M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miller R. and Millar R. (2011), Social Enterprise Spin-Outs from the English Health Service: A Right to Request but Was Anyone Listening?, Working Paper 52, Third Sector Research Centre, http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/Research/SocialEnterprise/Arighttorequest/tabid/778/Default.aspx.
National Audit Office (NAO) (2011), Establishing Social Enterprises under the Right to Request Programme, London: The Stationary Office.
Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2010), ‘Record number of businesses close in 2009’, News Release, 1 December 2010, http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/taxonomy/index.html?nscl=Changes±to±Businesses.
Office of the Third Sector (OTS) (2006a), Social Enterprise Action Plan: Scaling New Heights, London: Cabinet Office.
Office of the Third Sector (OTS) (2006b), Partnership in Public Services: An Action Plan for Third Sector Involvement, London: Cabinet Office.
Pawson R., Greenhalgh T., Harvey G. and Walshe K. (2005), ‘Realist review − a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions’, Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 10: 1, 2134.
Peattie K. and Morley A. (2008), Social Enterprises: Diversity and Dynamics, Contexts and Contributions, a Research Monograph, Cardiff: ESRC Centre for Business Relationships.
Pharoah C., Scott D. and Fisher A. (2004), Social Enterprise in the Balance: Challenges for the Voluntary Sector, West Malling: Charities Aid Foundation.
Packwood D. (2007), Commissioning, Contracting and Service Delivery of Children's Services in the Voluntary and Community Sector, VCS Engage.
Peredo A. M. and McLean M. (2006), ‘Social entrepreneurship: a critical review of the concept’, Journal of World Business, 41: 1, 5665.
Powell M. (ed.) (2002), Evaluating New Labour's Welfare Reforms, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Powell M. (ed.) (2007), Understanding the Mixed Economy of Welfare, Bristol: The Policy Press.
Powell M., Millar R., Mulla A., Brown H., Fewtrell C., McLeod H., Goodwin N., Dixon A. and Naylor C. (2011), Comparative Case Studies of Health Reform in England, Final Report, London: Department of Health Policy Research Programme.
Salamon L. M. (1993), ‘The marketization of welfare: changing nonprofit and for-profit roles in the American welfare state’, Social Service Review, 67: 1, 1639.
SQW Consulting (2007), Research on Access to Finance: Report to the Office of the Third Sector, London: SQW Consulting.
Sunley P. and Pinch S. (2011), ‘Financing social enterprise: social bricolage or evolutionary entrepreneurialism?’, Paper presented at 3rd International Social Innovation Research Conference, London Southbank University, London, 12–13 September 2011.
Teasdale S. (2010), What's in a Name? The Construction of Social Enterprise, Working Paper 46, Third Sector Research Centre, http://www.tsrc.ac.uk/Publications/tabid/500/Default.aspx.
Tribal (2009), Social Enterprise Pathfinder Programme Evaluation, Final Report, Newchurch: Tribal.
Wells P., Chadwick-Coule T., Dayson C. and Morgan G. (2010), Futurebuilders Evaluation, Final Report Sheffield Hallam University (CRESR).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 109 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 299 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.