This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
A.Benish
(2010), ‘Re-bureaucratizing welfare administration,’ Social Service Review, 84 (1): 77–101.
A.Benish
(2014), ‘Outsourcing, Discretion, and Administrative Justice: Exploring the Acceptability of Privatized Decision Making. Law & Policy, 36: 2, 113–133.
A.Benish
and D.Levi-Faur
(2012), ‘New forms of administrative law in the age of third-party government,’ Public Administration
90: 4, 886–900.
H.Haber
(2011), ‘Regulating-for-Welfare: A Comparative Study of “Regulatory Welfare Regimes” in the Israeli, British, and Swedish Electricity Sectors’, Law & Policy, 33: 1, 116–148.
H.Haber
(2015), ‘Regulation as Social Policy: Home Evictions and Repossessions in The UK and Sweden’, Public Administration, 93: 3, 806–821.
F.Berner
(2011), ‘New Private Pensions in Germany: A Pension Market or a Branch of the Welfare State? Contested Regulatory Issues’, in L.Leisering
(ed.), The New Regulatory State, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
B.Ebbinghaus
(ed.) (2011), The Varieties of Pension Governance: Pension Privatization in Europe, New York: Oxford University Press.
P.Frericks
(2013), “Strengthening Market Principles in Welfare Institutions: How Hybrid Pension Systems Impact on Social-risk Spreading”, Journal of Social Policy, 42: 4, 665–683.
J.Gal
(2002), ‘How well does a partnership in pensions really work?’, Ageing and Society, 22: 2, 161–183.
J.Gal
(2010), ‘Is there an extended family of Mediterranean welfare states?’, Journal of European Social Policy, 20: 4, 283–300.
J.Le Grand
(1991), ‘Quasi-Markets and Social Policy’, The Economic Journal, 101: 408, 1256–1267.
M.Leimgruber
(2012), ‘The Historical Roots of a Diffusion Process: The Three-Pillar Doctrine and European Pension Debates (1972–1994)’, Global Social Policy, 12: 1, 24–44.
L.Leisering
(2011), ‘Transformation of the State: Comparing the New Regulatory State to the Post-War Provider State’, in L.Leisering
(ed.), The New Regulatory State, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
L.Leisering
(2012), ‘Pension privatization in a welfare state environment: socializing private pensions in Germany and the United Kingdom’, Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 28: 2, 139–151.
D.Levi-Faur
(2013), ‘The Odyssey of the Regulatory State: From a “Thin” Monomorphic Concept to a “Thick” and Polymorphic Concept’, Law and Policy, 35: 1–2, 29–50.
D.Levi-Faur
and S.Gilad
(2004), ‘The rise of the British regulatory state: Transcending the privatization debate’, Comparative Politics, 37: 1, 105–124.
D.Mabbett
(2012), ‘The Ghost in the Machine Pension Risks and Regulatory Responses in the United States and the United Kingdom’. Politics & Society, 40: 1, 107–129.
D.Mabbett
(2011), ‘The Regulatory Politics of Private Pensions in the UK and Germany’, in L.Leisering
(ed.), The New Regulatory State, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
G.Majone
(1997), ‘From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance’, Journal of Public Policy, 17: 2, 139–167.
T.Meyer
and P.Bridgen
(2012), ‘Business, Regulation and Welfare Politics in Liberal Capitalism’, Policy & Politics, 40: 3, 387–403.
M.Naczyk
and M.Seeleib-Kaiser
(2015), ‘Solidarity against All Odds Trade Unions and the Privatization of Pensions in the Age of Dualization’, Politics and Society, 43: 3, 361–384.
P.Taylor-Gooby
, T.Larsen
, and J.Kananen
(2004), ‘Market means and welfare ends: the UK welfare state experiment’, Journal of Social Policy, 33: 4, 573–592.
C.Trampusch
(2007), ‘Industrial Relations as a Source of Social Policy: A Typology of the Institutional Conditions for Industrial Agreements on Social Benefits’, Social Policy & Administration, 41: 251–270.
