Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Universal Welfare by ‘Other Means’? Social Tax Expenditures and the Australian Dual Welfare State


International debates about the comparative institutional structures of welfare states have focused on social expenditure and the inclusiveness of social policy. However, these debates have not accounted for the significant rise of fiscal welfare and, in particular, social tax expenditures (STEs) in our understanding of welfare regimes. The growth of STEs has been particularly significant in Australia. While there has been recognition that STEs contribute to a second tier of welfare provision in some policy domains, there has been no systematic attempt to account for them within the institutional structure of the Australian welfare state. In this article, we chart the rise of STEs, the reasons for their growth in the Australian political economy and conceive of them as forming a second institutional layer of a dual welfare state. We conclude by suggesting that this analysis has broader implications for other, particularly liberal, welfare regimes.

Corresponding author
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

L. Bryson (1992), Welfare and the State: Who Benefits?, Hong Kong: Macmillan Press.

F. G. Castles (2004), The Future of the Welfare State: Crisis Myths and Crisis Realities, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

W. Korpi and J. Palme (1998), ‘The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the western countries’, American Sociological Review, 63: 5, 661–87.

P. Mendes (2009), ‘Retrenching or renovating the Australian welfare state: the paradox of the Howard government's neoliberalism’, International Journal of Social Welfare, 18: 1, 102–10.

P. Pierson (2001), ‘Coping with permanent austerity: welfare state restructuring in affluent democracies’, The New Politics of the Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University, pp. 410–56.

L. Segal (2004), ‘Why it is time to review the role of private health insurance in Australia’, Australian Health Review, 27: 1, 315

J. Smith (2003), Tax Expenditures: The $30 Billion Twilight Zone of Government Spending, Canberra: Department of the Parliamentary Library.

S. S. Surrey and P. R. McDaniel (1985), Tax Expenditures, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

P. Taylor-Gooby (2004), ‘New risks and social change’, in P. Taylor-Gooby (eds.), New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of the European Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 128.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 7
Total number of PDF views: 99 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 278 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 28th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.