Skip to main content Accesibility Help
×
×
Home

Why Countries ‘Get Tough on the Work-Shy’: The Role of Adverse Economic Conditions

  • CARLO KNOTZ (a1)
Abstract

There has been a clear trend toward greater conditionality and coercion in labour market and social policy in recent decades, a key part of which is tougher sanctions for unemployment benefit claimants who refuse offers of employment or otherwise fail to comply with their obligations. Our understanding of this trend and its determinants is so far built only on a corpus of small-N evidence, while systematic comparative large-N analyses are lacking. As a result, the broad patterns of policy change and their general political drivers remain underexplored. This paper fills this gap by examining unemployment benefit sanction reforms in 20 democracies between 1980 and 2012 using an original dataset. It is shown that governments introduce tougher sanctions in order to reconcile two competing pressures that arise during economic downturns: an increased need for social protection and reduced fiscal revenues. The findings, which are also applicable to other historical periods and policy areas, provide an impulse for future comparative large-N research on ‘demanding activation’ policies.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Alber, J. (1981), ‘Government responses to the challenge of unemployment: The development of unemployment insurance in Europe’, in Flora, P. and Heidenheimer, A.J. (eds.), The Development of Welfare States in Europe and America, New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 151–83.
Armingeon, K., Knöpfel, L., Weisstanner, D. and Engler, S. (2014), Comparative Political Data Set I, 1960-2012, Berne: Institute of Political Science, University of Berne.
Arndt, C. (2013), The Electoral Consequences of Third Way Welfare State Reforms: Social Democracy's Transformation and its Political Costs, Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Atkinson, A. B. (1990), ‘Income maintenance for the unemployed in Britain and the response to high unemployment’, Ethics, 100, 3, 569585.
Barnes, L. and Hicks, T. (2015), ‘Risk, recession, and declining popular demand for the welfare state’, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE), 228.
Beck, N. and Katz, J. N. (1995), ‘What to do (and not do do) with time-series cross-section data’, American Political Science Review, 89, 3, 634647.
Blekesaune, M. (2007), ‘Economic conditions and public attitudes to welfare policies’, European Sociological Review, 23, 3, 393403.
Blekesaune, M. and Quadagno, J. (2003), ‘Public attitudes towards welfare state policies: A comparative analysis of 24 nations’, European Sociological Review, 19, 5, 415427.
Bonoli, G. (2013), The Origins of Active Social Policy: Labour Market and Childcare Policies in a Comparative Perspective, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brender, A. and Drazen, A. (2008), ‘How do budget deficits and economic growth affect reelection prospects? Evidence from a large panel of countries’, American Economic Review, 98, 5, 22032220.
Clasen, J. (2000), ‘Motives, means and opportunities: Reforming unemployment compensation in the 1990s’, West European Politics, 23, 2, 89112.
Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (2007), ‘Levels and levers of conditionality: measuring change within welfare states’, in Clasen, J. and Siegel, N.A. (eds.), Investigating Welfare State Change: The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 166197.
Clasen, J. and Clegg, D. (eds.) (2011), Regulating the Risk of Unemployment: National Adaptations to Post-Industrial Labour Markets in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Clasen, J., Clegg, D. and Goerne, A. (2016), ‘Comparative social policy analysis and active labour market policy: Putting quality before quantity’, Journal of Social Policy, 45, 1, 2138.
Cronert, A. (forthcoming), ‘Unemployment reduction or labor force expansion? How partisanship matters for the design of active labor market policy in Europe’, Socio-Economic Review.
Davidsson, J. B. and Marx, P. (2013), ‘Losing the issue, losing the vote: Issue competition and the reform of unemployment insurance in Germany and Sweden’, Political Studies, 61, 3, 505522.
De Boef, S. and Keele, L. (2008), ‘Taking time seriously’, American Journal of Political Science, 52, 1, 184200.
Druckman, J. N. (2004), Political preference formation: competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. American Political Science Review, 98, 4, 671686.
Dunn, A. (2013), ‘Activation workers’ perceptions of their long-term unemployed clients’ attitudes towards employment’, Journal of Social Policy, 42, 4, 799817.
Durr, R.H. (1993), ‘What moves policy sentiment?’, American Political Science Review, 87, 1, 158–70.
Eichhorst, W., Kaufmann, O. and Konle-Seidl, R. (eds.) (2008a), Bringing the Jobless into Work? Experiences with Activation Schemes in Europe and the US, Heidelberg: Springer.
Eichhorst, W., Kaufmann, O., Konle-Seidl, R. and Reinhard, H.J. (2008b), ‘Bringing the jobless into work? An introduction to activation policies’, in Eichhorst, W., Kaufmann, O. and Konle-Seidl, R. (eds.), Bringing the Jobless into Work? Experiences with Activation Schemes in Europe and the US, Heidelberg: Springer, 116.
Fossati, F. (2018), ‘Who wants demanding active labour market policies? Public attitudes towards policies that put pressure on the unemployed’, Journal of Social Policy, 47, 1, 7797.
Funke, M., Schularick, M. and Trebesch, C. (2015), ‘Going to the extremes: Politics after financial crises, 1870-2014’, CESifo Working Paper, 5553.
Giger, N. and Nelson, M. (2013), ‘The welfare state or the economy? Preferences, constituencies, and strategies for retrenchment’, European Sociological Review, 29, 5, 1083–94.
Grubb, D. (2000), ‘Eligibility criteria for unemployment benefits’, OECD Economic Studies, 31, II, 147–84.
Hacker, J.S., Rehm, P. and Schlesinger, M. (2013), ‘The insecure American: Economic experiences, financial worries, and policy attitudes’, Perspectives on Politics, 11, 1, 2349.
Hasselpflug, S. (2005), ‘Availability criteria in 25 countries’, Ministry of Finance Denmark Working Paper, 12/2005.
Häusermann, S., Picot, G. and Geering, D. (2013), ‘Rethinking party politics and the welfare state – recent advances in the literature’, British Journal of Political Science, 43, 1, 221–40.
Huber, E. and Stephens, J.D. (2001), Development and Crisis of the Welfare State, Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Iversen, T. and Soskice, D. (2001), ‘An asset theory of social policy preferences’, American Political Science Review, 95, 4, 875–93.
Jahn, D. (2006), ‘Globalization as ‘Galton's problem’: The missing link in the analysis of diffusion patterns in welfare state development.’ International Organization, 60, 2, 401–31.
Jeene, M., van Oorschot, W. and Uunk, W. (2014), ‘The dynamics of welfare opinions in changing economic, institutional and political contexts: An empirical analysis of Dutch deservingness opinions, 1975–2006’, Social Indicators Research, 115, 2, 731749.
Jensen, C. (2007), ‘Fixed or variable needs? Public support and welfare state reform’, Government and Opposition, 42, 2, 139157.
Jessop, B. (1999), ‘The changing governance of welfare: Recent trends in its primary functions, scale, and modes of coordination’, Social Policy & Administration, 33, 4, 348359.
Jordan, J. D. (2018), ‘Welfare grunters and workfare monsters? An empirical review of the operation of two UK ‘work programme'centres’, Journal of Social Policy, 47, 3, 583601.
Knotz, C. and Nelson, M. (2015), The Comparative Unemployment Benefit Conditions and Sanctions Dataset (v. 03/2015). Department of Political Science, Lund University, Lund.
Knotz, C. (2018), A rising workfare state? Unemployment benefit conditionality in 21 OECD countries, 1980–2012. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 34 (2):91108.
Kootstra, A. and Roosma, F. (2018), ‘Changing public support for welfare sanctioning in Britain and The Netherlands: A persuasion experiment’, Social Policy and Administration, 52, 4, 847861.
Korpi, W. and Palme, J. (2003), ‘New politics and class politics in the context of austerity and globalization: Welfare state regress in 18 countries, 1975-95’, American Political Science Review, 97, 3, 425445.
Lindvall, J. (2014), ‘The electoral consequences of two great crises’, European Journal of Political Research, 53, 4, 747–65.
Loopstra, R., Fledderjohann, J., Reeves, A. and Stuckler, D. (2018), ‘Impact of welfare benefit sanctioning on food insecurity: a dynamic cross-area study of food bank usage in the UK’, Journal of Social Policy, 47, 3, 437457.
Ludwig-Mayerhofer, W., Behrend, O. and Sondermann, A. (2014), ‘Activation, public employment services and their clients: The role of social class in a continental welfare state’, Social Policy and Administration, 48, 5, 594612.
Margalit, Y. (2013), ‘Explaining social policy preferences: Evidence from the great recession’, American Political Science Review, 107, 1, 80103.
Ministry of Finance Denmark (1998), ‘Availability criteria in selected OECD countries’, Ministry of Finance Denmark Working Paper, 06/1998.
van Oorschot, W. (2002), ‘Miracle or nightmare? A critical review of Dutch activation policies and their outcomes’, Journal of Social Policy, 31, 3, 399420.
van Oorschot, W. (2006), ‘Making the difference in social Europe: deservingness perceptions among citizens of European welfare states’, Journal of European Social Policy, 16, 1, 2342.
Oschmiansky, F., Schmid, G. and Kull, S. (2003), ‘Faule Arbeitslose?’, Leviathan, 31, 1, 331.
Podestà, F. (2006), ‘Comparing time series cross-section model specifications: the case of welfare state development’, Quality and Quantity, 40, 4, 539559.
Raffass, T. (2017), ‘Demanding activation’, Journal of Social Policy, 46, 2, 349365.
Rehm, P. (2016), Risk Inequality and Welfare States: Social Policy Preferences, Development, and Dynamics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rueda, D. (2006), ‘Social democracy and active labour-market policies: Insiders, outsiders and the politics of employment promotion’, British Journal of Political Science, 36, 3, 385406.
Rueda, D. (2014), ‘Dualization, crisis and the welfare state’, Socio-Economic Review, 12, 2, 381407.
Rueda, D. (2015), ‘The state of the welfare state: Unemployment, labor market policy, and inequality in the age of workfare’, Comparative Politics, 47, 3, 296314.
Saint-Paul, G. (1998), ‘A framework for analyzing the political support for active labor market policy’, Journal of Public Economics, 67, 2, 151165.
Schram, S. F., Soss, J., Fording, R. C. and Houser, L. (2009), ‘Deciding to discipline: Race, choice, and punishment at the frontlines of welfare reform’, American Sociological Review, 74, 3, 398422.
Scruggs, L. (2007), ‘Welfare state generosity across space and time’, in Clasen, J. and Siegel, N.A. (eds.), Investigating Welfare State Change: The ‘Dependent Variable Problem’ in Comparative Analysis, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 133165.
Stevenson, R. T. (2001), ‘The economy and policy mood: a fundamental dynamic of democratic politics?’, American Journal of Political Science, 45, 3, 620–33.
van den Berg, G. J. and Vikström, J. (2014), ‘Monitoring job offer decisions, punishments, exit to work, and job quality’, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116, 2, 284334.
van Berkel, R. (2010), ‘The provision of income protection and activation services for the unemployed in ‘active’ welfare states. An international comparison’, Journal of Social Policy, 39, 1, 1734.
Venn, D. (2012), ‘Eligibility criteria for unemployment benefits: Quantitative indicators for OECD and EU countries’, OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, 131.
Vis, B. (2009), ‘Governments and unpopular social policy reform: Biting the bullet or steering clear?European Journal of Political Research, 48, 1, 3157.
Vlandas, T. (2013), ‘Mixing apples with oranges? Partisanship and active labour market policies in Europe’, Journal of European Social Policy, 23, 1, 320.
Watts, B., Fitzpatrick, S., Bramley, G. and Watkins, D. (2014), Welfare sanctions and conditionality in the UK, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Watts, B. and Fitzpatrick, S. (2018), Welfare Conditionality, Abingdon & New York: Routledge.
Wlezien, C. and Soroka, S.N. (2012), ‘Political institutions and the opinion-policy link’, West European Politics, 35, 6, 1407–32.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of Social Policy
  • ISSN: 0047-2794
  • EISSN: 1469-7823
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-social-policy
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Knotz supplementary material
Knotz supplementary material 1

 PDF (61 KB)
61 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed