Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T03:15:10.413Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Period; Twenty-Five Years On

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2011

Leonard Y. Andaya  and
Barbara Watson Andaya
Leonard Y. Andaya
Affiliation:
University of Hawai'i, Manoa
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The identity of “Southeast Asia” has been debated since the 1950s, when the region began to develop as an area of academic viability around which courses could be constructed, programmes built, and research published. Much less controversy has accompanied the growing use of “early modern”, a term which seems set to displace “precolonial” in periodizing Southeast Asian history. The phrase, of course, comes from scholarship on Europe, where it was popularized as a result of efforts to find shared “periods” that would facilitate the writing of a general history. It would be surprising if questions as to the applicability of “early modern” in Southeast Asia do not spark off some debate, especially in light of subaltern writings that reject the notion of modernity as a universal. For such historians the very invocation of the word implicitly sets a “modern Europe” against a “yet to be modernized non-Europe”. But whatever decision is made regarding terminology, scholarship on Southeast Asia is increasingly viewing a period that stretches from about the fifteenth to the early nineteenth century as rather different from those traditionally described as “classical” and “colonial/modern”. The term “early modern” itself is at present a convenient tool for historical reference, and only time will tell whether it will find general acceptance.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Southeast Asian Studies , Volume 26 , 25th Anniversary Special Issue 1: Perspectives on Southeast Asian Studies , March 1995 , pp. 92 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © The National University of Singapore 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Charles F. Keyes, “A Conference at Wingspread and Rethinking Southeast Asia Studies”, in Hirschman, Charleset al., Southeast Asian Studies in the Balance: Reflections from America (Ann Arbor: Association for Southeast Asia Studies, 1992), pp. 9–20Google Scholar; Lieberman, Victor, “Local Integration and Eurasian Analogies: Structuring Southeast Asian History, c. 1350-c. 1830”, Modern Asian Studies 27, 3 (1993): 475CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Benda, Harry J., “The Structure of Southeast Asian History: Some Preliminary Observations”, reprinted from the Journal of Southeast Asian History 3 (1962): 106–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar, in Benda, Harry J., Continuity and Change in Southeast Asia (New Haven: Yale Monograph Series No. 18, 1972), pp. 122–27.Google Scholar

2 Notably Barker, Ernest, Clark, George and Vaucher, P. (eds.), The European Inheritance, Vol. II (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954).Google Scholar

3 For a thoughtful discussion, see Rafael's, Vicente L. Preface to the paperback edition of Contracting Colonialism: Translation and Christian Conversion in Tagalog Society under Early Spanish Rule (Duke University Press: Durham and London, 1993), pp. ix–xv.Google Scholar

4 Translated as The Indianized States of Southeast Asia (Honolulu: East-West Center Press, 1968).Google Scholar

5 Benda, Harry J., “The Structure of Southeast Asian History”, in Continuity and Change in Southeast Asia. Collected Journal Articles of Harry J. Benda (New Haven: Yale University Southeast Asia Studies, Monograph No. 18, 1972), p. 142.Google Scholar

6 Marr, David G. and Milner, A.C. (eds.), Southeast Asia in the 9th to 14th Centuries (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7 Steinberg, D.J. et al. , In Search of Southeast Asia. A Modern History (New York: Praeger, 1971), p. 1.Google Scholar

8 Papers given at a conference held at the Australian National University were edited by Reid, Anthony and Castles, Lance as Pre-colonial State Systems in Southeast Asia The Malay Peninsula, Sumatra, Bali-Lombok, South Celebes (Kuala Lumpur: Monographs of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, No. 6, 1975).Google Scholar

9 The 1989 conference was sponsored by the Joint Committee on Southeast Asia in the Social Science Research Council and the American Council of Learned Societies. The collection was edited by Anthony Reid and called, Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era: Trade, Power, and Belief (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1993).

10 Hall, D.G.E., A History of South-East Asia, Third edition (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1968).Google Scholar

11 van Leur, J.C., Indonesian Trade and Society: Essays in Asian Social and Economic History (The Hague and Bandung: W. van Hoeve, 1955), pp. 268–75.Google Scholar

12 Smail, John, “On the Possibility of an Autonomous History of Southeast Asia”, Journal of Southeast Asian History 2, 2 (1961): 72; Benda, “The Structure of Southeast Asian History”, p. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13 Generate Missiven van Gouverneurs-Generaal en Raden aan Heren XVII der Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie, Vols. 1–8, ed. Coolhaas, W. Ph.; vol. 9, ed. van Goor, J. (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1960–1989).Google Scholar

14 For example, Dhiravat na Pombejra, “A Political History of Siam under the Prasat-thong Dynasty, 1629–1688” (Ph.D. diss., University of London, 1984).Google Scholar

15 Wolters, O.W., The Fall of Srivijaya in Malay History (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1970), pp. ix, xiiGoogle Scholar; and Wolters, O.W., History, Culture and Region in Southeast Asian Perspectives (Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, 1982), p. x.Google Scholar

16 Benda, “The Structure of Southeast Asian History”, pp. 123–24.

17 Ricklefs, M.C., Jogjakarta under Sultan Mangkubumi 1749–1792. A History of the Division of Java (London: Oxford University Press, 1974), p. xix.Google Scholar

18 Kathirithamby-Wells, J., The British West Sumatran Presidency (1760–1785): Problems of Early Colonial Enterprise (Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Gerrit Knaap, “Kruidnagelen en Christenen: De Verenigde Oost-Indische Compagnie en de Bevolking van Ambon 1656–1696” (Utrecht Ph.D., 1985)Google Scholar; Luc Nagtegaal, “Rijden op een Hollandse Tijger” (Utrecht Ph.D., 1988)Google Scholar; Bonney, R., Kedah 1771–1821, The Search for Security and Independence (Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press, 1971).Google Scholar

19 Four studies which appeared in the same year provide very different case studies: Ricklefs, M.C., War, Culture and Economy in Java, 1677–1726: Asian and European Imperialism in the Early Kartasura Period (Sydney: Allen and Unwin, 1993)Google Scholar; Andaya, Leonard Y., The World of Maluku; Eastern Indonesia in the Early Modern Period (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Andaya, Barbara Watson, To Live as Brothers: Southeast Sumatra in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries (Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press, 1993)Google Scholar; Jane Drakard, “A Kingdom of Words: Minangkabau Sovereignty in Sumatran History” (Ph.D. diss., Australian National University, Canberra, 1993).Google Scholar

20 Lieberman, “Local Integration”, p. 480.

21 The foremost example of this approach is Lieberman, Victor, Burmese Administrative Cycles: Anarchy and Conquest, c. 1580–1760 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 For example, Taylor, Jean, The Social World of Batavia: European and Eurasian in Dutch Asia (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Yu, Insun, Law and Society in Sevententh and Eighteenth Century Vietnam (Seoul: Asiatic Research Center, Korea University, 1990)Google Scholar; Blussé, Leonard, Strange Company: Chinese Settlers, Mestizo Women and the Dutch in VOC Batavia (Dordrecht and Riverton: Foris Publications, 1986)Google Scholar; Ruurdje Laarhoven, “The Power of Cloth: The Textile Trade of the Dutch East India Company (VOC) 1600–1780” (Ph.D. diss., Australian National University, Canberra, 1994).Google Scholar

23 Reid, Anthony, Southeast Asia in the Age of Commerce 1450–1680. Vol. I, The Lands Below the Winds (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1988)Google Scholar; Vol. II, Expansion and Crisis (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

24 Lieberman, “Local Integration”, pp. 479, 572.

25 Tarling, Nicholas (ed.), The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia, Vol. I (Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar

26 Cantwell-Smith, W.G., “Review of Southeast Asia in the Early Modern Era”, in South East Asia Research 2, 2 (September 1994): 201.Google Scholar

27 See Heginbotham, Stanley J., “Point of View”, in The Chronicle of Higher Education, 19 Oct. 1994, p. A68.Google Scholar

28 “Indigenous Southeast Asian Historiography: A Colloquium”, 13th Conference of the International Association of Historians of Asia, Sophia University, Tokyo, 5 Sep. 1994. Other participants in the panel where Ileto made these remarks were Taufik Abdullah, Thanet Aphomsuvan, Charnvit Kasetsiri, Maria Serena Diokno, Pham Due Duong, Shaharil Talib and Mohammad Raduan bin Mohd. Ariff.