Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-14T10:58:00.593Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Successors of singular cardinals and coloring theorems II

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2014

Todd Eisworth  and
Saharon Shelah
Todd Eisworth
Affiliation:
Institute of Mathematics, The Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalem, Israel
Saharon Shelah
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, Ohio UniversityAthens, Oh 45701, USA, E-mail: eisworth@math.ohiou.edu Department of Mathematics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, Nj, USA, E-mail: shelah@math.huji.ac.il
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the extent to which techniques used in [10], [2], and [3]—developed to prove coloring theorems at successors of singular cardinals of uncountable cofinality—can be extended to cover the countable cofinality case.

Keywords

square-brackets partition relationsminimal walkssuccessor of singular cardinal
Type
Research Article
Information
The Journal of Symbolic Logic , Volume 74 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 1287 - 1309
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Symbolic Logic 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Baumgarter, James E., A new class of order-types, Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, vol. 54 (1991), no. 3, pp. 195–227.Google Scholar
[2]Eisworth, T. and Shelah, S., Successors of singular cardinals and coloring theorems I, Archive for Mathematical Logic, vol, 44 (2005), no. 5, pp. 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Eisworth, Todd, A note on strong negative partition relations, Fundamenta Mathematicae, vol. 202 (2009), pp. 97–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Eisworth, Todd, Successors of singular cardinals, Handbook of set theory (Foreman, Matthew and Kanamori, Akihiro, editors), vol. II, Springer, forthcoming.Google Scholar
[5]Eisworth, Todd, Club-guessing, stationary reflection, and coloring theorems. Annals of Pure and Applied Logic, submitted.Google Scholar
[6]Erdös, P., Hajnal, A., and Rado, R., Partition relations for cardinal numbers, Acta Mathematica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, vol. 16 (1965), pp. 93–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Kojman, Menachem, The ABC of PCF, unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
[8]Shelah, Saharon, On successors of singular cardinals, Logic Colloquium '78 (Mons, 1978), Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 97, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979, pp. 357–380.Google Scholar
[9]Shelah, Saharon, Cardinal arithmetic, Oxford Logic Guides, vol. 29, Oxford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Shelah, Saharon, There are Jonsson algebras in many inaccessible cardinals, Cardinal arithmetic, Oxford Logic Guides, vol. 29, Oxford University Press, 1994, Chapter III.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Todorčević, Stevo, Partitioning pairs of countable ordinals, Acta Mathematica, vol. 159 (1987), no. 3–4, pp. 261–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Todorčević, Stevo, Walks on ordinals and their characteristics, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 263, Birkhauser, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Todorčević, Stevo, Coherent sequences, Handbook of set theory (Foreman, Matthew and Kanamori, Akihiro, editors), vol. I, Springer, forthcoming.Google Scholar