Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-wq2xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T10:11:19.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

INTERCHANGE RINGS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2016

CHARLES C. EDMUNDS*
Affiliation:
Mount Saint Vincent University, Mathematics, 166 Bedford Highway, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3M 2J6 email cedmunds6868@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

An interchange ring,$(R,+,\bullet )$, is an abelian group with a second binary operation defined so that the interchange law$(w+x)\bullet (y+z)=(w\bullet y)+(x\bullet z)$ holds. An interchange near ring is the same structure based on a group which may not be abelian. It is shown that each interchange (near) ring based on a group $G$ is formed from a pair of endomorphisms of $G$ whose images commute, and that all interchange (near) rings based on $G$ can be characterized in this manner. To obtain an associative interchange ring, the endomorphisms must be commuting idempotents in the endomorphism semigroup of $G$. For $G$ a finite abelian group, we develop a group-theoretic analogue of the simultaneous diagonalization of idempotent linear operators and show that pairs of endomorphisms which yield associative interchange rings can be diagonalized and then put into a canonical form. A best possible upper bound of $4^{r}$ can be given for the number of distinct isomorphism classes of associative interchange rings based on a finite abelian group $A$ which is a direct sum of $r$ cyclic groups of prime power order. If $A$ is a direct sum of $r$ copies of the same cyclic group of prime power order, we show that there are exactly ${\textstyle \frac{1}{6}}(r+1)(r+2)(r+3)$ distinct isomorphism classes of associative interchange rings based on $A$. Several examples are given and further comments are made about the general theory of interchange rings.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2016 Australian Mathematical Publishing Association Inc. 

References

DeWolf, D., ‘On double inverse semigroups’, Master’s Thesis, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, 2013, page 95.Google Scholar
Eckmann, B. and Hilton, P., ‘Group-like structures in general categories. I. Multiplications and comultiplications’, Math. Ann. 145 (1961), 227255.Google Scholar
Edmunds, C. C., ‘Constructing double magma on groups using commutation operations’, Canad. Math. Bull. (to appear) arXiv:1308.2691.Google Scholar
Hoffman, K. and Kunze, R., Linear Algebra (Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1961).Google Scholar
Kock, J., ‘Note on commutativity of double semigroups and two-fold monodial categories’, J. Homotopy Relat. Struct. 2(2) (2007), 217228.Google Scholar
Loday, J.-L. and Vallette, B., Algebraic Operands, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, 346 (Springer, Heidelberg, 2012).Google Scholar
McCoy, N. H., Introduction to Modern Algebra (Allyn and Bacon, Boston, 1975).Google Scholar