Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa


  • Nicholas A. Curott (a1)

This paper addresses a long-running debate in the economics literature—the debate over Adam Smith’s theory of money and banking—and argues that recent reinterpretations of Smith’s monetary theory have erroneously diverted historians of monetary thought from the correct, but briefly articulated, initial interpretations of Henry Thornton (1802) and Jacob Viner (1937). Smith did not present either the real-bills theory or a price-specie-flow theory of banknote regulation, as is now generally presumed, but rather a reflux theory based upon the premise that the demand for money is fixed at a particular nominal quantity. Smith’s theory denies that an excess supply of money can ordinarily make it into the domestic nominal income stream or influence prices or employment.

Hide All
Filippo Cesarano . 1998. “Hume’s Specie-flow Mechanism and Classical Monetary Theory: An Alternative Interpretation.” Journal of International Economics 45: 173186.

Jerome de Boyer des Roches . 2013. “Bank Liquidity Risk from John Law (1705) to Walter Bagehot (1873). The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 20 (4): 547557.

Robert V Eagly . 1970. “Adam Smith and the Specie-flow Doctrine.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 17: 6168.

Lance Girton , and Don Roper . 1978. “J. Laurence Laughlin and the Quantity Theory of Money.” Journal of Political Economy 86 (4): 599625.

David Glasner . 1985. “A Reinterpretation of Classical Monetary Theory.” Southern Economic Journal 52 (1): 4667.

David Glasner . 1989a. Free Banking and Monetary Reform. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

David Glasner . 1992. “The Real-Bills Doctrine in the Light of the Law of Reflux.” History of Political Economy 24 (4): 867894.

David Glasner . 2000. “Classical Monetary Theory and the Quantity Theory.” History of Political Economy 32 (1): 3959.

David Laidler . 1981. “Adam Smith as a Monetary Economist.” The Canadian Journal of Economics 14 (2): 185200.

Morris Perlman . 1989. “Adam Smith and the Paternity of the Real Bills Doctrine.” History of Political Economy 21 (1): 7790.

Wilfredo Santiago-Valiente . 1988. “Historical Background of the Classical Monetary Theory and the ‘Real-Bills’ Banking Tradition.” History of Political Economy 20 (1): 4363.

George A. Selgin , and Lawrence H. White . 1985. “The Evolution of a Free Banking System.” Economic Inquiry 25 (3): 439457.

Neil T Skaggs . 1991. “John Fullarton’s Law of Reflux and Central Bank Policy.” History of Political Economy 23 (3): 457480.

Earl A Thompson . 1974. “The Theory of Money and Income Consistent with Orthodox Value Theory.” In G. Horwich and P. A. Samuelson , eds., Trade, Stability, and Macroeconomics. New York: Academic Press, pp. 427453.

Edwin G West . 1997. “Adam Smith’s Support for Money and Banking Regulation: A Case of Inconsistency.” Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 29 (1): 127134.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the History of Economic Thought
  • ISSN: 1053-8372
  • EISSN: 1469-9656
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 33 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 242 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 19th June 2017 - 18th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.