Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s

  • Mark Blaug (a1)

Something happened to economics in the decade of the 1950s that is little appreciated by most economists and even by professional historians of economic thought. The subject went through an intellectual revolution as profound in its impact as the so-called Keynesian Revolution of pre-war years. I call it the Formalist Revolution after Ward (1972, pp. 40–41), who was the first to recognize the profound intellectual transformation of economics in the years after World War II.

Hide All
Arrow, K. J. 1951. Social Choice and Individual Values. New York: Wiley & Son.
Arrow, K. J. and Debreu, G.. 1954. “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy.” Econometrica 22 (07): 265–90.
Backhouse, R. E. and Creedy, J., eds. 1999. From Classical Economics to the Theory of the Firm: Essays in Honour of D. P. O'Brien. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Blaug, M. 1990. The Methodology of Economics, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blaug, M. 1997a. “Competition as an End-State and Competition As a Process.” Not Only an Economist: Recent Essays. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: pp. 6686.
Blaug, M. 1997b. Economic Theory in Retrospect, 5th edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blaug, M. 1999. “Misunderstanding Classical Economics: The Sraffian Interpretation of the Surplus Approach.” History of Political Economy 31 (2): 213–36.
Blaug, M. 2003. “The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s.” In Samuels, Warren J., ed., The Blackwell Companion to The History of Economic Thought.” Oxford: Basil Blackwell, forthcoming.
Clower, R. C. 1994. “Economics As an Inductive Science.” Southern Economic Journal 60 (4): 805–14.
Costa, M. L. 1998. General Equilibrium: Analysis and the Theory of Markets. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Debreu, G. 1959. Theory of Value: An Axiomatic Analysis of Economic Equilibrium. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dorfman, R., Samuelson, P. A., and Solow, R. M.. 1958. Linear Programming and Economic Analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Dosi, G. and Winter, S. G.. 2002. “Interpreting Economic Change: Evolution, Structure and Games.” The Economics of Choice, Change and Organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 128–51.
Fisher, F. M. 1983. Disequilibrium Foundations of Equilibrium Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Giocoli, G. 2000a. “Fixing the Point: The Contribution of Early Game Theory to the Tool Box of Modern Economics.” Unpublished paper, Department of Economics, University of Pisa.
Giocoli, G. 2000b. Equilibrium and Rationality in Modern Economics: From the Years of “High Theory” to the Foundation of Modern Game Theory. Ph.D. thesis, Universita degli Studi di Firenze.
Hahn, F. 1973. On the Notion of Equilibrium in Economics: An Inaugural Lecture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Reprinted in F. Hahn, Equilibrium and Macroeconomics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1984, pp. 4371.
High, J., ed. 2001. Competition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Ingrao, B. and Israel, G.. 1990. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jacobsen, H. J. 1996. “On the Foundations of Nash Equilibrium.” Economics and Philosophy 12 (04): 6788.
Kirman, A. 1989. “The Intrinsic Limits of Modern Economic Theory: The Emperor Has No Clothes.” Economic Journal 99 (Supplement): 126–39.
Kirzner, I. 2000. “Competition and the Market Process: Some Doctrinal Milestones.” In Krafft, J., ed., The Process of Competition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1126.
Koopmans, T. C. 1957. Three Essays on the State of Economic Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Leonard, R. J. 1994. “Reading Cournot, Reading Nash: The Creation and Stabilisation of Nash Equilibrium. Economic Journal 104 (05): 492511.
Lipsey, R. C. 2001. “Success and Failure in the Transformation of Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (06): 169201.
Luce, R. D. and Raiffa, H.. 1957. Game and Decisions. New York: Wiley.
Luenberger, D. G. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Machovec, F. M. 1995. Perfect Competition and the Transformation of Economics. London: Routledge.
Mas-Collel, A., Whinston, M. D., and Green, R.. 1995. Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mehrling, P. G. 1997. The Money Interest and the Public Interest: American Monetary Thought, 1920–1970. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Milath, G. J. 1998. “Do People Play Nash Equilibrium? Lessons from Evolutionary Game Theory?Journal of Economic Literature 36 (3): 1347–74.
Mirowski, P. 2002. Machine Dreams: How Economics Became a Cyborg Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morgan, M. S. and Rutherford, M.. 1998. “American Economics: The Character of the Transformation.” In From Interwar Pluralism to Postwar Neoclassicism, Annual Supplement, History of Political Economy 30: 1–26.
Nash, J. F. 1996. Essays in Game Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Nelson, R. R. 1981. “Assessing Private Enterprise: An Exegesis of Tangled Doctrine.” Bell Journal of Economics 2 (1): 93111. Reprinted in P. J. Boettke, ed., The Legacy of Friedrich von Hayek, Vol. III. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 80–98.
Patinkin, D. 1956. Money, Interest and Prices: An Interpretation of Money and Value Theory. Evanston, IL: Peterson. 2nd edition, Abridged, New York: Harper & Row, 1989.
Samuelson, P. A. 1947. Foundations of Economic Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Samuelson, P. A. 1989. “How Foundations Came To Be.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (3): 1375–86.
Solow, R. M. 1957. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production function.” Review of Economics and Statistics 39 (08): 312–20.
Sraffa, P. 1960. Production of Commodities by Means of Commodities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Starr, R. M. 1997. General Equilibrium Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, D. A. 1996. Walras's Market Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Walker, D. A. 1997. Advances in General Equilibrium Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Ward, B. 1972. What's Wrong with Economics? London: Macmillan.
Weintraub, E. R. 1991. Stabilizing Dynamics: Constructing Economic Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Weintraub, E. R. and Mirowski, P.. 1994. “The Pure and the Applied: Bourbakism Comes to Mathematical Economics.” Science in Context 7 (2): 245–72.
Yonay, Y. P. 1998. The Struggle over the Soul of Economics: Institutionalist and Neoclassical Economics in America Between the Wars. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ziman, J. 2000. Real Science: What It Is, and What It Means. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the History of Economic Thought
  • ISSN: 1053-8372
  • EISSN: 1469-9656
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed