Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

HAYEK THE APRIORIST?

  • Scott Scheall (a1)

Abstract

The paper argues that Terence Hutchison’s (1981) argument that the young F. A. Hayek maintained a methodological position markedly similar to that of Ludwig von Mises fails to support the relevant conclusion. The first problem with Hutchison’s argument is that it is not clear exactly what conclusion he meant to establish. Mises (in)famously maintained a rather extreme methodological apriorism. However, the concept of a priori knowledge that emerges from Hayek’s epistemology as implied in his work on theoretical psychology is the opposite of Mises’s treatment of a priori knowledge. Thus, it cannot be maintained—if, indeed, Hutchison meant to establish—that Hayek was a Misesian apriorist during the years in question. What’s more, the paper shows that Hutchison’s argument does not support a weaker interpretation of the relevant conclusion. There are alternative interpretations of Hutchison’s evidence, more charitable and more consistent with Hayek’s epistemology, which undermine Hutchison’s conclusion.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Butos, William N. [1985] 1991. “Hayek and General Equilibrium Analysis.” In Wood, John Cunningham and Woods, Ronald N., eds., Friedrich A. Hayek: Critical Assessments. Volume IV. London: Routledge, pp. 102117.
Caldwell, Bruce. 1988. “Hayek’s Transformation.” History of Political Economy 20, 4 (Winter): 513541.
Caldwell, Bruce. [1988] 1989. “La Méthodologie de Hayek: Description, évaluation, et interrogations.” In Dostaler, G. and Ethier, D., eds., Friedrich Hayek: Philosophie, économie, et politique. Paris: Economica, pp. 7185.
Caldwell, Bruce. 1992a. “Hayek the Falsificationist? A Refutation.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 10: 115.
Caldwell, Bruce. 1992b. “Reply to Hutchison.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 10: 3342.
Caldwell, Bruce. 2004. Hayek’s Challenge: An Intellectual Biography of F. A. Hayek. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ebenstein, Alan. 2001. Friedrich Hayek: A Biography. New York: Palgrave.
Hands, D. Wade. 2001. Reflection without Rules: Economic Methodology and Contemporary Science Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hart, John. 2009. “Machlup’s Misrepresentation of Hutchison’s Methodology.” Journal of Economic Methodology 16, 3 (Sept.): 325340.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1931. Prices and Production. New York: Augustus M. Kelly.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1935a. “The Nature and History of the Problem.” In Hayek, F. A., ed., Collectivist Economic Planning. London: Routledge, pp. 140.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1935b. “The Present State of the Debate.” In Hayek, F. A., ed., Collectivist Economic Planning. London: Routledge, pp. 201243.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1937. “Economics and Knowledge.” Economica 4, 13 (Feb.): 3354.
Hayek, Friedrich A. [1933] 1939. “Price Expectations, Monetary Disturbances and Malinvestments.” In Friedrich A. Hayek, Profits, Interest, and Investment. London: Routledge, pp. 135156.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1941. The Pure Theory of Capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1942–1944. “Scientism and the Study of Society.” Economica 9, 35 (Aug. 1942): 267291; Vol. 10, 37 (Feb. 1943): 34–63; Vol. 11, 41 (Feb. 1944): 27–39.
Hayek, Friedrich A. [1940] 1948. “The Competitive Solution.” In Hayek, Friedrich A., Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 181208.
Hayek, Friedrich A. [1943] 1948. “The Facts of the Social Sciences.” In Hayek, Friedrich A., Individualism and Economic Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3356.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1952a. The Sensory Order: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Theoretical Psychology. Reprint, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1952b. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1955. “Degrees of Explanation.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 6, 23 (Nov.): 209225.
Hayek, Friedrich A. [1964] 1967. “The Theory of Complex Phenomena.” In Hayek, F. A., Studies in Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 2242.
Hayek, Friedrich A. [1969] 1978a. “The Primacy of the Abstract.” In Hayek, F. A., New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 3549.
Hayek, Friedrich A. [1975] 1978b. “The Pretence of Knowledge.” In Hayek, F. A., New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics, and the History of Ideas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 2334.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1981. Letter (26 November) to Terence Hutchison. Hoover Institution, Hayek Archives, box 26, folder 8.
Hayek, Friedrich A. [1920] 1991. “Contributions to a Theory of How Consciousness Develops.” Translated by Grete Heinz. Hoover Institution, Hayek Archives, box 92, folder 1.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 1994. Hayek on Hayek: An Autobiographical Dialogue. Edited by Kresge, Stephen and Wenar, Leif. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 2006. Die Sensorische Ordnung: Eine Untersuchung der Grudlagen der Theoretischen Psychologie. Translated by Streit, Manfred. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.
Hayek, Friedrich A. 2008. Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle. Translated by Kaldor, N. and Croone, H. M.. In Salerno, Joseph, ed., In Prices and Production and Other Works: F.A. Hayek on Money, the Business Cycle, and the Gold Standard. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute, pp. 1130.
Hutchison, Terence. W. 1938. The Significance and Basic Postulates of Economic Theory. London: Macmillan.
Hutchison, Terence. W. 1981. The Politics and Philosophy of Economics: Marxians, Keynesians, and Austrians. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hutchison, Terence. W. 1988. “The Case for Falsificationism.” In De Marchi, Neil, ed., The Popperian Legacy in Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169181.
Hutchison, Terence. W. 1992. “Hayek and ‘Modern Austrian’ Methodology: Comment on a Non-Refuting Refutation.” Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology 10: 1732.
Hutchison, Terence. W. 1998. “Ultra-deductivism from Nassau Senior to Lionel Robbins and Daniel Hausman.” Journal of Economic Methodology 5: 4391.
Hutchison, Terence. W. 2009. “A Formative Decade: Methodological Controversy in the 1930s.” Edited by Backhouse, R. E.. Journal of Economic Methodology 16, 3 (Sept.): 297314.
Leonard, Robert. 2010. Von Neumann, Morgenstern, and the Creation of Game Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Menger, Carl. 1963. Problems of Economics and Sociology. Edited by Schneider, L., translated by Nock, F. J. from the German Untersuchungen über die Methode der Sozialwissenschaften, und politischen Ökonomie inbesondere. Leipzig: Verlag von Duncker & Humblot.
Mises, Ludwig von. 1962. The Ultimate Foundation of Economic Science: An Essay on Method. Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand and Co.
Mises, Ludwig von. 1966. Human Action: A Treatise on Economics. Fourth revised edition. Chicago: Contemporary.
Mises, Ludwig von. [1960] 1981. Epistemological Problems of Economics. Translated by Reisman, George. New York: New York University Press.
Morgenstern, Oskar. 1928. Wirtschaftsprognose: Eine Untersuchung ikrer Voraussetzungen und Möglichkeiten. Vienna: Springer.
Polanyi, Michael. 1966. The Tacit Dimension. Garden City, NY: Doubleday & Company, Inc.
Popper, Karl. 1934. Logik der Forschung. Vienna: Springer.
Schulak, Eugen Maria, and Unterköfler, Herbert. 2011. The Austrian School of Economics: A History of Its Ideas, Ambassadors, and Institutions. Auburn, AL: Ludwig von Mises Institute.
Schumpeter, Joseph. 1908. Das Wesen und der Hauptinhalt der theoretischen Nationalökonomie. Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot.
Weimar, Walter B., and Palermo, David S., 1982. Cognition and the Symbolic Process. Volume 2. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Wieser, Friedrich. 1929. Gesammelte Abhandlugen. Edited by Hayek, F. A.. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.

HAYEK THE APRIORIST?

  • Scott Scheall (a1)

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed