Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 8
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Kelemen, Mihaela and Klaes, Matthias 2012. Paradigm “wars” asmethodenstreit. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 13.

    Moore, Gregory C. G. 2011. The Anglo-Irish context for William Edward Hearn's economic beliefs and the ultimate failure of hisPlutology. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 19.

    Zouboulakis, Michel S. 2008. Contesting the autonomy of political economy: The early positivist criticism of economic knowledge1. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 85.

    Witztum, Amos 2005. Economic Sociology: The Recursive Economic System of J. S. Mill. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 27, Issue. 03, p. 251.

    Moore, Gregory 2003. John Neville Keynes's Solution to the English Methodenstreit. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 25, Issue. 01, p. 5.

    Black, R. D. Collison 2002. The political economy of Thomas Edward Cliffe Leslie (1826-82): a re-assessment. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 9, Issue. 1, p. 17.

    Moore, Gregory 2000. Nicholson Versus Ingram on the History of Political Economy and a Charge of Plagiarism. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 22, Issue. 04, p. 433.

    Moore, G. C. G. 1996. Robert Lowe and the role of the vulgar economist in the English Methodenstreit. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 3, Issue. 1, p. 69.

  • Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Volume 17, Issue 1
  • April 1995, pp. 57-77

T. E. Cliffe Leslie and the English Methodenstreit


This article is part of a wider historical research program in which I seek to examine the origins of past methodological debates. It is my opinion that economists ignore methodological and philosophical issues until either the doctrinal conclusions of the school to which they belong are challenged or they themselves contest the doctrinal conclusions of an alternative school. Once this occurs, economists select, reinterpret or construct methodological precepts in order to gain the maximum support for their position. Under this hypothesis the formation and articulation of methodological beliefs are largely endogenous to matters relating to economics; that is, the traditional causal process of methodology to theory to policy is turned on its head and becomes policy to theory to methodology. The aim of what follows is to illustrate this research program by examining the methodological framework expounded by T. E. Cliffe Leslie in the early stages of the English economic Methodenstreit or “battle of methods.”

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

P. Adelman 1971. “Frederic Harrison and the ‘Positivist’ Attack on Orthodox Political Economy,History of Political Economy, 3, 170–89.

R. D. C. Black 19721981. Papers and Correspondence of William Stanley Jevons, 7 vols., Macmillan, London.

A. W. Coats 1954. “The Historicist Reaction to English Political Economy,Economica, n.s., 21, 143–53.

H. Grossman 1943. “The Evolutionist Revolt Against Classical Economics, Parts I and II,Journal of Political Economy, 51, 381–96, 502–22.

G. M. Koot 1975. “T. E. Cliffe Leslie, Irish Social Reform, and the Origins of the English Historical School of Economics,History of Political Economy, 7, 312–36.

G. M. Koot 1980. “English Historical Economics and the Emergence of Economic History in England,History of Political Economy, 12, 173205.

R. Yeo 1985. “An Idol of the Market-Place: Baconianism in Nineteenth Century Britain,History of Science, 23, 251–98.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the History of Economic Thought
  • ISSN: 1053-8372
  • EISSN: 1469-9656
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *