Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 19
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Davis, John B. 2016. Economics, Neuroeconomics, and the Problem of Identity. Schmollers Jahrbuch, Vol. 136, Issue. 1, p. 15.


    Gilead, Tal 2015. Economics Imperialism and the Role of Educational Philosophy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 47, Issue. 7, p. 715.


    Petri, Fabio 2014. BLAUG VERSUS GAREGNANI ON THE ‘FORMALIST REVOLUTION’ AND THE EVOLUTION OF NEOCLASSICAL CAPITAL THEORY. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 36, Issue. 04, p. 455.


    Endres, Anthony M. 2013. Is the economics of time and ignorance a “classic”?. The Review of Austrian Economics, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 17.


    Ashman, Sam 2012. Economics and Political Economy Today: Introduction to the Symposium on Fine and Milonakis. Historical Materialism, Vol. 20, Issue. 3, p. 3.


    Brown, A. and Spencer, D. A. 2012. The nature of economics and the failings of the mainstream: lessons from Lionel Robbins's Essay. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 36, Issue. 4, p. 781.


    Kelemen, Mihaela and Klaes, Matthias 2012. Paradigm “wars” asmethodenstreit. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 13.


    Reiss, Julian 2012. IDEALIZATION AND THE AIMS OF ECONOMICS: THREE CHEERS FOR INSTRUMENTALISM. Economics and Philosophy, Vol. 28, Issue. 03, p. 363.


    Düppe, Till 2011. How economic methodology became a separate science. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 18, Issue. 2, p. 163.


    Fratini, S. M. and Levrero, E. S. 2011. Sraffian indeterminacy: a critical discussion. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 35, Issue. 6, p. 1127.


    Martin-Nielsen, Janet 2011. A forgotten social science? Creating a place for linguistics in the historical dialogue. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 47, Issue. 2, p. 147.


    Endres, A. M. and Donoghue, M. 2010. Defending Marshall's 'masterpiece': Ralph Souter's critique of Robbins' Essay. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 34, Issue. 3, p. 547.


    Gloria-Palermo, Sandye 2010. Introducing formalism in economics: The growth model of John von Neumann. Panoeconomicus, Vol. 57, Issue. 2, p. 153.


    Diamond, Arthur M. 2009. Fixing ideas: how research is constrained by mandated formalism. Journal of Economic Methodology, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 191.


    LIZARDO, OMAR 2009. Formalism, Behavioral Realism and the Interdisciplinary Challenge in Sociological Theory. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Vol. 39, Issue. 1, p. 39.


    Garegnani, Pierangelo 2007. Professor Samuelson on Sraffa and the classical economists. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 14, Issue. 2, p. 181.


    Hands, D. Wade 2007. 2006 HES Presidential address a Tale of two Mainstreams: Economics and Philosophy of Natural Science in the Mid-Twentieth Century. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 29, Issue. 01, p. 1.


    Neill, Robin 2006. Varieties of Scientific System: From Veblen to the Postmoderns. Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 40, Issue. 3, p. 673.


    Hoover, Kevin D. 2004. Lost Causes. Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Vol. 26, Issue. 02, p. 149.


    ×
  • Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Volume 25, Issue 2
  • June 2003, pp. 145-156

The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s

  • Mark Blaug (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1042771032000083309
  • Published online: 01 June 2009
Abstract

Something happened to economics in the decade of the 1950s that is little appreciated by most economists and even by professional historians of economic thought. The subject went through an intellectual revolution as profound in its impact as the so-called Keynesian Revolution of pre-war years. I call it the Formalist Revolution after Ward (1972, pp. 40–41), who was the first to recognize the profound intellectual transformation of economics in the years after World War II.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

K. J. Arrow and G. Debreu . 1954. “Existence of an Equilibrium for a Competitive Economy.” Econometrica 22 (07): 265–90.

M. Blaug 1999. “Misunderstanding Classical Economics: The Sraffian Interpretation of the Surplus Approach.” History of Political Economy 31 (2): 213–36.

M. Blaug 2003. “The Formalist Revolution of the 1950s.” In Warren J. Samuels , ed., The Blackwell Companion to The History of Economic Thought.” Oxford: Basil Blackwell, forthcoming.

R. C. Clower 1994. “Economics As an Inductive Science.” Southern Economic Journal 60 (4): 805–14.

A. Kirman 1989. “The Intrinsic Limits of Modern Economic Theory: The Emperor Has No Clothes.” Economic Journal 99 (Supplement): 126–39.

R. J. Leonard 1994. “Reading Cournot, Reading Nash: The Creation and Stabilisation of Nash Equilibrium. Economic Journal 104 (05): 492511.

R. C. Lipsey 2001. “Success and Failure in the Transformation of Economics.” Journal of Economic Methodology 8 (06): 169201.

F. M. Machovec 1995. Perfect Competition and the Transformation of Economics. London: Routledge.

R. M. Solow 1957. “Technical Change and the Aggregate Production function.” Review of Economics and Statistics 39 (08): 312–20.

B. Ward 1972. What's Wrong with Economics? London: Macmillan.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the History of Economic Thought
  • ISSN: 1053-8372
  • EISSN: 1469-9656
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-history-of-economic-thought
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×