Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T21:05:14.161Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A population-based analysis of qualitative features of the neuropsychological test performance of individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type: Implications for individuals with questionable dementia.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 1997

DEBORAH A. CAHN
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California Department of Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, California
DAVID P. SALMON
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California
MARK W. BONDI
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California Department of Psychology, California State University, San Marcos, California
NELSON BUTTERS
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California
SHANNON A. JOHNSON
Affiliation:
San Diego Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Diego, California
WIGBERT C. WIEDERHOLT
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, California
ELIZABETH BARRETT-CONNOR
Affiliation:
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California

Abstract

Qualitative features of the neuropsychological test performance of individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type (DAT) were examined in a population-based study. Qualitative error scores were derived from measures of verbal and figural memory, verbal fluency and confrontation naming for 38 patients with clinically diagnosed DAT, 236 normal elderly (NE) individuals, and 72 others who were questionably demented and at risk (AR) for DAT. Persons with DAT made a greater proportion of intrusion and perseverative errors, and more lexical and semantic naming errors, than the NE participants. These measures provided fair specificity but poor sensitivity for the diagnosis of DAT, and a logistic model based on these measures correctly classified 98% of the NE participants, but only 29% of the DAT participants. The AR participants demonstrated a pattern of errors that was highly similar to that of the DAT patients, and when their scores were subjected to the logistic model, 90% were classified as NE and 10% as DAT. These results indicate that specific error types that have been associated with DAT in self-referred or clinic-based samples also occur in the general population to a greater degree in individuals with DAT or questionable dementia than in NE individuals. Furthermore, these qualitative features may have some diagnostic usefulness in that their presence provides reasonable specificity for DAT or questionable dementia. (JINS, 1997, 3, 387–393.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1997 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)