Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Walking and talking therapy: Improving cognitive–motor dual-tasking in neurological illness


Using randomized control trial methodology, we evaluated the effectiveness of a 5-week cognitive–motor dual-tasking training program developed to improve performance of a group of people with dual-tasking difficulties arising from acquired brain injury. Training involved twice-daily practice on exercises involving walking being combined with tasks which increased in cognitive demand over the course of the intervention. A treatment group (n = 10) was compared with a control group (n = 9). The primary outcome measure was a task requiring participants to walk and carry out a spoken sentence verification task simultaneously. Secondary outcome measures were measures of dual-tasking involving either two motor tasks or two cognitive tasks. A questionnaire measure relating to activities of daily living requiring dual-tasking was also completed. Compliance with the training program was good. We found evidence of improvement in performance on the primary outcome measure, but little evidence of generalization to other measures. There was some evidence that participants believed that their dual-tasking performance in everyday life was improved after the intervention. The study was limited in terms of sample size, was not blinded and did not control fully for therapist contact time, but has produced valuable data relating to effect sizes associated with this form of intervention. (JINS, 2009, 15, 112–120.)

Corresponding author
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Jonathan Evans, University of Glasgow, Faculty of Medicine, Section of Psychological Medicine, Gartnavel Royal Hospital, 1055 Great Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0XH UK. E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

D.N. Brooks & W McKinlay . (1987). Return to work within the first seven years of severe head injury. Brain Injury, 1, 515.

R. Camicioli , T. Bouchard , & L Licis . (2006). Dual-tasks and walking fast: Relationship to extra-pyramidal signs in advanced Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 248, 205209.

R. Camicioli , D. Howieson , S. Lehman , & J Kaye . (1997). Talking while walking: The effect of a dual task in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 48, 955958.

P. Haggard , J. Cockburn , J. Cock , C. Fordham , & D Wade . (2000). Interference between gait and cognitive tasks in a rehabilitating neurological population. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 69, 479486.

R.H. Logie , S. Della Sala , G. Cocchini , & A.D Baddeley . (2004). Is there a specific executive capacity for dual task coordination? Evidence from Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology, 18, 504513.

L. Lundin-Olsson , L. Nyberg , & Y Gustafson . (1997). “Stops walking when talking” as a predictor of falls in elderly people. The Lancet, 349, 617.

M.I. Posner & S.E Peterson . (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 2542.

I.H. Robertson , V. Ridgeway , E. Greenfield , & A Parr . (1997). Motor recovery after stroke depends upon intact sustained attention: A two year follow-up study. Neuropsychology, 11, 290295.

L. Rochester , V. Hetherington , D. Jones , A. Nieuwboer , A.M. Willems , G. Kwakkel , & E Van Wegen . (2004). Attending to the task: Interference effects of functional tasks on walking in Parkinson’s disease and the roles of cognition, depression, fatigue, and balance. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 15781585.

A.J. Wilkins , T. Shallice , & R McCarthy . (1987). Frontal lesions and sustained attention. Neuropsychologia, 25, 359365.

G. Yogev , C. Peretz , S. Springer , E.S. Simon , & J.M Hausdorff . (2005). Dual tasking, gait rhythmicity, and Parkinson’s disease: Which aspects of gait are attention demanding? European Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 12481256.

K.K Zakzanis . (2001). Statistics to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth: Formulae, illustrative numerical examples, and heuristic interpretation of effect size analyses for neuropsychological researchers. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 16, 653667.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • ISSN: 1355-6177
  • EISSN: 1469-7661
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-international-neuropsychological-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 11
Total number of PDF views: 114 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 406 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th June 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.