Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-688nx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-06T05:38:14.096Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonation types in production of phonological tone: the case of Green Mong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2009

Jean E. Andruski  and
Martha Ratliff
Jean E. Andruski
Affiliation:
Audiology & Speech-Language Pathology, 581 Manoogian Hall, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. j.andruski@wayne.edu
Martha Ratliff
Affiliation:
English Department, 51 West Warren, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. martha.ratliff@wayne.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study looks at the relative importance of phonation type in identifying tones in languages with a ‘mixed’ pitch/phonation tone system. Green Mong is a tone language with an inventory of 7 contrastive tones and a tonal system that incorporates both fundamental frequency (FO) and phonation type distinctions. The study examines 3 Green Mong tones, which have similar FO contours and are characterized by the distinctive use of breathy, creaky and modal phonation. Acoustic analyses of 3 male and 3 female speakers' productions indicate that the tones are distinguished by their FO, relative amplitude of lower and higher harmonics (H1-H2), vowel duration, vowel quality and voice onset times. Discriminant analyses, used to estimate the relative value of these different cues, indicate that H1-H2 is the best predictor of tone category membership. This is the case for both high and low vowels, although the magnitude of the H1-H2 difference is substantially smaller for high vowels. The 2 predictor variables which are next most strongly correlated with the discriminant functions also relate to phonation type. However, FO does continue to play a role in classification of tokens into tone categories.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 30 , Issue 1-2 , December 2000 , pp. 37 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bickley, C. (1982). Acoustic analysis and perception of breathy vowels. MIT Speech Communication Working Papers 1, 71–81.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1967). Phonetic analysis of breathy (murmured) vowels in Gujarati. Indian Linguistics 28, 71–139.Google Scholar
Fujisaki, H. & Kawashima, T. (1968). The roles of pitch and higher formants in the perception of vowels. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics AU-16, 73–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerstman, L.J. (1968). Classification of self-normalized vowels. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics AU-16, 78–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heimbach, E.E. (1979). White Hmong-English Dictionary. Linguistic Series IV, Data Paper 75. Ithaca, N. Y.: Cornell University Southeast Asia Program.Google Scholar
Henderson, E.J.A. (1977). The larynx and language: a missing dimension? Phonetica 34, 256–263.Google Scholar
Huffman, M.K. (1985). Measures of phonation type in Hmong. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 61, 1–25.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. (1999). Tone and phonation in Western A-Hmao. SOAS Working Papers in Linguistics 9, 227–251.Google Scholar
Kirk, P.L., Ladefoged, P. & Ladefoged, J. (1984). Using a spectrograph for measures of phonation types in a natural language. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 59, 102–113.Google Scholar
Klatt, D.H. & Klatt, L.C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male speakers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87, 820–857.Google Scholar
L-Thongkum, T. (1988). Phonation types in Mon-Khmer languages. In Fujimura, O. (editor), Vocal Physiology: Voice Production, Mechanisms and Functions, 319–333. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P, Maddieson, I. & Jackson, M. (1988). Investigating phonation types in different languages. In Fujimura, O. (editor), Vocal Physiology: Voice Production, Mechanisms and Functions, 297–317. New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. & Broadbent, D.E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 29, 98–104.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. & Peterson, G.E. (1959). Vowel amplitude and phonemic stress in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 31, 428–435.Google Scholar
Lyman, T.A. (1974). Dictionary of MongNjua. Janua Linguarum Series Practica 123. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. & Ladefoged, P. (1985). “Tense” and “lax” in four minority languages of China. Journal of Phonetics 13, 433–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, J.A. (1973). Tonogenesis in Southeast Asia. In Hyman, L.M. (editor), Consonant Types and Tone, 71–96. Los Angeles: University of Southern California.Google Scholar
Miller, J.L. & Liberman, A.M. (1979). Some effects of later-occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Perception and Psychophysics 25, 457–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, R.L. (1953). Auditory tests with synthetic vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25, 114–121.Google Scholar
Mottin, J. (1978). Elements de Grammaire Hmong Blanc. Bangkok: Don Bosco Press.Google Scholar
Niederer, B. (1998). Les langues Hmong-Mien (Miao-Yao): Phonologie historique. Lincom Studies in Asian Linguistics 07. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Pike, K.E. (1948). Tone Languages; A Technique for Determining the Number and Type of Pitch Contrasts in a Language, with Studies in Tonemic Substitution and Fusion. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Port, R.F. (1979). Influence of tempo on stop closure duration as a cue for voicing and place. Journal of Phonetics 7, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ratliff, Martha (1992). Meaningful Tone: A Study of Tonal Morphology in Compounds, Form Classes, and Expressive Phrases in White Hmong. DeKalb, Illinois: Northern Illinois University Center for Southeast Asian Studies. Illinois: Northern Illinois University Center for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Smalley, W., Vang, C.K. & Yang, G.Y. (1990). Mother of Writing: the Origin and Development of a Hmong Messianic Script. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, K.N. (1981). Vibration modes in relation to model parameters. In Stevens, K.N. & Hirano, M. (editors), Vocal Fold Physiology, 291–301. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (1983). Using multivariate statistics. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Thurgood, G. (1997). Toward a laryngeal account of tonogenesis: revising the mechanisms in Haudricourt's model. Paper presented at the 6th Annual Workshop in Comparative Linguistics: Prosody and Language Change. Detroit, MI.Google Scholar
Wang, F. & Mao, Z. (1995). Miaoyaoyu Guyin de Gouni [The reconstruction of proto-Miao-Yao pronunciation]. Beijing: Zhongguo shehuikexue chubanshe [China Social Sciences Press].Google Scholar