Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The consonant length contrast in Persian: Production and perception

  • Benjamin B. Hansen (a1) and Scott Myers (a2)
Abstract

Across languages, there is a tendency to avoid length contrasts in the most vowel-like consonant classes, such as glides or laryngeals. Such gaps could arise from the difficulty of determining where the boundary between vowel and consonant lies when the transition between them is gradual. This claim is tested in Persian (Farsi), which has length contrasts in all classes of consonants, including glides and laryngeals. Persian geminates were compared to singletons in three different speaking rates and seven different consonant classes. Geminates were found to have longer constriction intervals than singletons, and this length effect interacted with both speaking rate and manner of articulation. In one of two perception experiments, Persian speakers identified consonants as geminate or singleton in stimuli in which the constriction duration was systematically varied. The perceptual boundary between geminates and singletons was most sharply defined for obstruents and least so for laryngeals, as reflected by the breadth of the changeover region in the identification curve. In the other perception experiment, subjects identified the length class of glides differing in constriction duration and formant transition duration. Longer formant transitions led to more geminate responses and to a broader changeover interval.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The consonant length contrast in Persian: Production and perception
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The consonant length contrast in Persian: Production and perception
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The consonant length contrast in Persian: Production and perception
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Andrews, J. Richard. 1975. Introduction to Classical Nahuatl. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Aoyama, Katsura & Reid, Lawrence. 2006. Cross-linguistic tendencies and durational contrasts in geminate consonants: An examination of Guinang Bontok geminates. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36 (2), 145157.
Arvaniti, Amalia. 1999. Effects of speaking rate on the timing of single and geminate sonorants. 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Berkeley, University of California (ICPhS XIV), vol. 1, 599–602.
Ashton, E. O., Mulira, E. M. K., Ndawula, E. G. M. & Tucker, A. N.. 1954. A Luganda grammar. London: Longmans.
Bates, Douglas & DebRoy, Saikat. 2007. nls: Nonlinear Least Squares. http://www.r-project.org/ (accessed 21 August 2008).
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin & Bolker, Ben. 2012. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes (version 0.999999-0). http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 (accessed 9 July 2013).
Bijankhan, Mahmood & Nourbakhsh, Mandana. 2009. Voice onset time in Persian initial and intervocalic stop production. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 39 (3), 335364.
Burrow, T. & Bhattacharya, S.. 1970. The Pengo language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Byrd, Dani & Tan, Cheng Cheng. 1996. Saying consonant clusters quickly. Journal of Phonetics 24 (2), 263282.
Deyhime, G. 2000. Farhang-i Avay-i Farsi [Dictionary of the sound of Persian]. Tehran: Farhang Moaser Publishers.
Esposito, Anna & Di Benedetto, Maria Gabriella. 1999. Acoustical and perceptual study of gemination in Italian stops. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106 (4), 20512062.
Garnes, Sara. 1976. Quantity in Icelandic: Production and Perception. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag.
Gay, Thomas. 1978. Effect of speaking rate on vowel formant movements. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 63 (1), 223230.
Gay, Thomas. 1981. Mechanisms in the control of speech rate. Phonetica 38 (1–3), 148158.
Hankamer, Jorge, Lahiri, Aditi & Koreman, Jacques. 1989. Perception of consonant length: Voiceless stops in Turkish and Bengali. Journal of Phonetics 17 (4), 283298.
Hansen, Benjamin B. 2004. Production of Persian geminate stops: Effects of varying speaking rate. In Agwuele, Augustine, Warren, Willis & Park, Sang-Hoon (eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Texas Linguistics Society Conference: Coarticulation in Speech Production and Perception, 8695. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Hansen, Benjamin B. 2012. The perceptibility of duration in the phonetics and phonology of contrastive consonant length. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
Hayes, Bruce. 1989. Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology, Linguistic Inquiry 20 (2), 253306.
Hirata, Yukari & Whiton, Jacob. 2005. Effects of speaking rate on the single/geminate stop distinction in Japanese. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (3), 16471660.
Kavitskaya, Darya. 2002. Compensatory lengthening: Phonetics, phonology, diachrony. New York: Routledge.
Kawahara, Shigeto. 2007. Sonorancy and geminacy. In Bateman, Leah, O'Keefe, Michael, Reilly, Ehren & Werle, Adam (eds.), Papers in Optimality Theory III (University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 32), 145186. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association.
Kawahara, Shigeto & Pangilinan, Melanie. To appear. Spectral continuity, amplitude changes, and perception of length contrasts. In Kubozono, Haruo (ed.), Aspects of geminate consonants. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keating, Patricia A. 1988. Underspecification in phonetics. Phonology 5 (2), 275292.
Klatt, Dennis. 1976. Linguistic uses of segment duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59 (5), 12081221.
Kostić, Djodje, Mitter, Alokananda & Krishnamurti, Bh.. 1977. A short outline of Telugu phonetics. Calcutta: Indian Statistical Institute.
Kuehn, David & Moll, Kenneth. 1976. A cineradiographic study of VC and CV articulatory velocities. Journal of Phonetics 4 (4), 303320.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Bojesen, R. H.. 2014. Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. http://www.R-project.org (accessed 18 December 2014).
Lahiri, Aditi & Hankamer, Jorge. 1988. The timing of geminate consonants. Journal of Phonetics 16 (3), 327338.
Lavoie, Lisa. 2000. Phonological patterns and phonetic manifestations of consonant weakening. Ph.D. dissertation, Cornell University.
Leben, William R. 1980. A metrical analysis of length. Linguistic Inquiry 11 (3), 497509.
Lehiste, Ilse. 1964. Acoustical characteristics of selected English consonants. Supplement to International Journal of American Linguistics 30.
Lehtonen, Jaakko. 1970. Aspects of quantity in Standard Finnish. Jyväskylä: Jyväskylä University Press.
Liberman, Alvin M., Delattre, Pierre C., Gerstman, Louis J. & Cooper, Franklin S.. 1956. Tempo of frequency change as a cue for distinguishing classes of speech sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology 52 (2), 127137.
Löfqvist, Anders. 2005. Lip kinematics in long and short stop and fricative consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117, 858878.
Löfqvist, Anders. 2007. Tongue movement kinematics in long and short Japanese consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122 (1), 512518.
Maddieson, Ian. 2008. Glides and gemination. Lingua 118 (12), 19261936.
Mahootian, Shahrzad. 1997. Persian. London: Routledge.
Majidi, Mohammad-Reza & Ternes, Elmar. 1999. Persian (Farsi). In IPA (ed.), The handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 124125. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Malik, Amar Nath. 1995. The phonology and morphology of Panjabi. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal Publishers.
Mauk, Claude. 2003. Undershoot in two modalities: Evidence from fast speech and fast signing. Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin.
McKee, Suzanne P., Klein, Stanley A. & Teller, Davida Y.. 1985. Statistical properties of forced-choice psychometric functions: Implications of probit analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 37 (4), 286298.
Myers, Scott & Hansen, Benjamin B.. 2005. The origin of vowel-length neutralization in vocoid sequences: Evidence from Finnish speakers. Phonology 22 (3), 317344.
Nababan, P. W. J. 1981. A grammar of Toba Batak (Pacific Linguistics, Series D, No. 37). Canberra: Australian National University.
Obrecht, Dean. 1965. Three experiments in the perception of geminate consonants in Arabic. Language and Speech 8 (1), 3141.
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, Carrie S., Hendrick, Roberta A. & Miller, Mary Frances (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior (Chicago Linguistics Society, 1–2 May 1981), 178203. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Ohala, John J. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In MacNeilage, Peter (ed.), The production of speech, 189216. New York: Springer.
Ohala, John J. 1993. The phonetics of sound change. In Jones, Charles (ed.), Historical linguistics: Problems and perspectives, 237278. London: Longman.
Öhman, Sven E. G. 1967. Numerical model of coarticulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 41, 310320.
Parker, Steve. 2008. Sound level protrusions as physical correlates of sonority. Journal of Phonetics 36 (1), 5590.
Penchoen, Thomas G. 1973. Tamazight of the Ayt Ndhir. Malibu: Undena Publications.
Peterson, Gordon E. & Lehiste, Ilse. 1960. Duration of syllable nuclei in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32 (6), 693703.
Pickett, Emily R., Blumstein, Sheila A. & Burton, Martha W.. 1999. Effects of speaking rate on the singleton/geminate consonant contrast in Italian. Phonetica 56 (3–4), 135157.
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Talkin, David. 1992. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. In Docherty, Gerard J. & Ladd, D. Robert (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody, 90117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pind, Jörgen. 1986. The perception of quantity in Icelandic. Phonetica 43 (1–3), 116139.
Podesva, Robert. 2000. Constraints on geminates in Buginese and Selayarese. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL) 19, 343356. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
Prince, Alan. 1984. Phonology with tiers. In Aronoff, Mark & Oehrle, Richard T. (eds.), Language sound structure, 234244. Cambridge, MA: MIT Pres.
Ridouane, Rachid. 2007. Gemination in Tashliyt Berber: An acoustic and articulatory study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37 (2), 119142.
Samareh, Y. 1977. The arrangement of segmental phonemes in Farsi. Tehran: Faculty of Letters, University of Tehran.
Samareh, Y. 1985. Avāshināsī-i Zabān-i Fārsī; [Phonetics of the Persian language]. Tehran: Markaz Nashr Dāneshgāhī.
Smith, Caroline. 1995. Prosodic patterns in the coordination of vowel and consonant gestures. In Connell, Bruce & Arvaniti, Amalia (eds.), Phonology and phonetic evidence: Papers in Laboratory Phonology IV, 205222. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tyler, Stephan Albert. 1969. Koya: An outline grammar. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Umeda, Noriko. 1977. Consonant duration in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 61 (3), 846858.
Van Son, R. J. H. H. & Pols, Louis C. W.. 1999. An acoustic description of consonant reduction. Speech Communication 28 (2), 125140.
Warner, Natasha & Tucker, Benjamin V.. 2011. Phonetic variability of stops and flaps in spontaneous and careful speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130 (3), 16061617.
Wichmann, Felix A. & Hill, N. Jeremy. 2001a. The psychometric function, I: Fitting, sampling, and goodness of fit. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (8), 12931313.
Wichmann, Felix A. & Hill, N. Jeremy. 2001b. The psychometric function, II: Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (8), 13141329.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the International Phonetic Association
  • ISSN: 0025-1003
  • EISSN: 1475-3502
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed