Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 4
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Ridouane, Rachid and Fougeron, Cécile 2011. Schwa elements in Tashlhiyt word-initial clusters. Laboratory Phonology, Vol. 2, Issue. 2,


    Davidson, Lisa 2011. Characteristics of stop releases in American English spontaneous speech. Speech Communication, Vol. 53, Issue. 8, p. 1042.


    Becker, Michael and Gouskova, Maria 2016. Source-Oriented Generalizations as Grammar Inference in Russian Vowel Deletion. Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 47, Issue. 3, p. 391.


    Bombien, Lasse Mooshammer, Christine Hoole, Philip and Kühnert, Barbara 2010. Prosodic and segmental effects on EPG contact patterns of word-initial German clusters. Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 38, Issue. 3, p. 388.


    ×
  • Journal of the International Phonetic Association, Volume 38, Issue 2
  • August 2008, pp. 137-165

Durational correlates for differentiating consonant sequences in Russian

  • Lisa Davidson (a1) and Kevin Roon (a1)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0025100308003447
  • Published online: 01 August 2008
Abstract

In Russian, the same consonant sequences are permitted in various phonotactic environments. The presence of a word boundary or reduced vowel can be phonologically contrastive, and both learners and experienced listeners may rely on fine acoustic cues to discriminate between phonotactic possibilities. In this study, durational characteristics of consonant sequences are examined to establish whether speakers use duration to distinguish (a) word-initial clusters (#C1C2), (b) consonant–schwa–consonant sequences (#C1əC2), and (c) sequences divided by a word boundary (C1#C2). Both monolingual native Russian speakers and bilingual Russian–English speakers produced several types of target sequences: stop+consonant, fricative+consonant, and nasal+consonant. Results show that C2 is significantly longer in C1#C2 than in other sequences. For #C1C2, when C1 is a stop, there is no significant difference in duration when compared with other sequence types, though C1s of other manners are significantly shorter. Differences in C1 burst duration for stops are consonant-specific, but a longer interconsonantal duration is a reliable cue to schwa presence in #C1əC2. These results are discussed with respect to their implications for gestural coordination, segmentation, and language learning.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Travis Bradley . 2007. Morphological derived-environment effects in gestural coordination: A case study of Norwegian clusters. Lingua 117, 950985.

Ann Bradlow , David Pisoni , Reiko Akahane-Yamada & Yoh'ichi Tohkura . 1996. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/: IV. Some effects of perceptual learning on speech production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 22992310.

Catherine Browman & Louis Goldstein . 1988. Some notes on syllable structure in articulatory phonology. Phonetica 45, 140155.


Martha Burton & Karen Robblee . 1997. A phonetic analysis of voicing assimilation in Russian. Journal of Phonetics 25, 97114.

Dani Byrd . 1996. Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences. Journal of Phonetics 24, 209244.

Dani Byrd . 2000. Articulatory vowel lengthening and coordination at phrasal junctures. Phonetica 57, 316.

Dani Byrd & Cheng Cheng Tan . 1996. Saying consonant clusters quickly. Journal of Phonetics 24, 263282.

Ioana Chitoran . 1998. Georgian harmonic clusters: Phonetic cues to phonological representation. Phonology 15, 121141.

Taehong Cho & Patricia Keating . 2001. Articulatory and acoustic studies on domain-initial strengthening in Korean. Journal of Phonetics 29, 155190.

Lisa Davidson . 2005. Addressing phonological questions with ultrasound. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 19, 619633.

Lisa Davidson . 2006a. Phonology, phonetics, or frequency: Influences on the production of non-native sequences. Journal of Phonetics 34, 104137.

Lisa Davidson . 2006b. Schwa elision in fast speech: Segmental deletion or gestural overlap? Phonetica 63, 79112.

Olga Dmitrieva . 2005. Final devoicing in Russian: Acoustic evidence of incomplete neutralization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117, 2570.

Benjamin Elson . 1956. Sierra Popoluca syllable structure. International Journal of American Linguistics 13, 1317.

Cécile Fougeron & Patricia Keating . 1997. Articulatory strengthening at the edges of prosodic domains. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101, 37283740.

Angela Friederici & Jeanine Wessels . 1993. Phonotactic knowledge of word boundaries and its use in infant speech perception. Perception & Psychophysics 54, 287295.

Adamantios Gafos . 2002. A grammar of gestural coordination. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20, 269337.


Morris Halle . 1971. The sound pattern of Russian. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.

Janet Henderson & Bruno Repp . 1982. Is a stop consonant released when followed by another stop consonant? Phonetica 39, 7182.

Elizabeth Hohne & Peter Jusczyk . 1994. Two-month-old infants’ sensitivity to allophonic differences. Perception & Psychophysics 56, 613623.

Peter Jusczyk , Elizabeth Hohne & Angela Bauman . 1999. Infants’ sensitivity to allophonic cues for word segmentation. Perception & Psychophysics 61, 14651476.

Dennis Klatt . 1976. Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59, 12081220.

Steven Lulich . 2004. Russian [v]: An acoustic study. Folia Linguistica 38, 6385.

Sven Mattys , Laurence White & James Melhorn . 2005. Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: A hierarchical framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134, 477500.

Lynn Hansberry Mayo , Mary Florentine & Soren Buss . 1997. Age of second-language acquisition and perception of speech in noise. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 40, 686693.

James McQueen . 1998. Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 2146.

Dennis Norris . 1994. Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 52, 189234.

Dennis Norris , James McQueen , Anne Cutler & Sally Butterfield . 1997. The possible-word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cognitive Psychology 34, 191243.

D. Kimbrough Oller . 1973. The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 54, 12351247.

Jaye Padgett & Marija Tabain . 2005. Adaptive Dispersion Theory and phonological vowel reduction in Russian. Phonetica 62, 1454.

Anne Pier Salverda , Delphine Dahan & James McQueen . 2003. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition 90, 5189.

Michele Sancier & Carol Fowler . 1997. Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics 25, 421436.

Donia Scott . 1982. Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 71, 9961007.

Keiichi Tajima , Robert Port & Jonathan Dalby . 1997. Effects of termoral correction on intelligibility of foreign accented English. Journal of Phonetics 25, 124.


Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the International Phonetic Association
  • ISSN: 0025-1003
  • EISSN: 1475-3502
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-international-phonetic-association
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×