Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-568f69f84b-pl66f Total loading time: 0.588 Render date: 2021-09-20T22:45:53.224Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Community structure and microhabitat preferences of harpacticoid copepods in a tropical reef lagoon (Zanzibar Island, Tanzania)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2008

H. Gheerardyn*
Affiliation:
Marine Biology Section, Biology Department, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Gent, Belgium
M. De Troch
Affiliation:
Marine Biology Section, Biology Department, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Gent, Belgium
S.G.M. Ndaro
Affiliation:
Department of Aquatic Environment and Conservation, University of Dar Es Salaam, PO Box 35064, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania
M. Raes
Affiliation:
Marine Biology Section, Biology Department, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Gent, Belgium
M. Vincx
Affiliation:
Marine Biology Section, Biology Department, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Gent, Belgium
A. Vanreusel
Affiliation:
Marine Biology Section, Biology Department, Ghent University, Krijgslaan 281-S8, 9000 Gent, Belgium
*Corresponding
Correspondence should be addressed to: H. Gheerardyn Marine Biology Section Biology DepartmentGhent UniversityKrijgslaan 281-S8 9000 GentBelgium email: hendrik.gheerardyn@ugent.be

Abstract

Three microhabitat types (dead coral fragments, coral gravel and coral sand) were distinguished and sampled at two locations (Matemwe and Makunduchi) in a tropical lagoon (Zanzibar Island, Tanzania), and the community structure, habitat preferences and biodiversity of the associated harpacticoid copepod fauna was investigated. The harpacticoid fauna is affected by sediment granulometry and by the structural differences between coral and both gravel and sediment. The coral fragments contained a specific assemblage composed of typical ‘phytal’ taxa (Tisbe, Paradactylopodia and Dactylopusia) along with other eurytopic and sediment-dwelling forms (Ameira, Ectinosoma and Amphiascus), which may be attracted by the sediment retained between the coral branches. The assemblages of coral gravel and upper sediment layer did not differ significantly from each other and had mostly the same dominant genera. The sediment from Matemwe was dominated by the interstitial Paramesochridae and the sediment from Makunduchi by Tetragonicipitidae. The coral fragments from Makunduchi sustained a more diverse assemblage than gravel and the different sediment layers. It was assumed that coral form and complexity, with implications for habitable space, nutritional resources and level of predation, are important in structuring diversity of the associated assemblage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alongi, D.M. (1989) The role of soft-bottom benthic communities in tropical mangrove and coral reef ecosystems. Aquatic Sciences 1, 243279.Google Scholar
Arroyo, N.L., Maldonado, M., Pérez-Portela, R. and Benito, J. (2004) Distribution patterns of meiofauna associated with a sublittoral Laminaria bed in the Cantabrian Sea (north-eastern Atlantic). Marine Biology 144, 231242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arroyo, N.L., Maldonado, M. and Walters, K. (2006) Within- and between-plant distribution of harpacticoid copepods in a North Atlantic bed of Laminaria ochroleuca. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 86, 309316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atilla, N., Wetzel, M. and Fleeger, J. (2003) Abundance and colonization potential of artificial hard substrate-associated meiofauna. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 287, 273287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Begon, M., Harper, J.L. and Townsend, C.R. (1990) Ecology. Individuals, populations and communities, 2nd edn.Boston: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Bell, S.S. and Hicks, G.R.F. (1991) Marine landscapes and faunal recruitment: a field test with seagrasses and copepods. Marine Ecology Progress Series 73, 6168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, S.S., Hicks, G.R.F. and Walters, K. (1988) Active swimming in meiobenthic copepods of seagrass beds: geographic comparisons of abundance and reproductive characteristics. Marine Biology 98, 351358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boucher, G. (1997) Structure and biodiversity of nematode assemblages in the SW lagoon of New Caledonia. Coral Reefs 16, 177186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxshall, G.A. and Halsey, S.H. (2004) Copepod orders and families. An introduction to copepod diversity. London: Ray Society.Google Scholar
Bozic, B. (1969) Copépodes Harpacticoïdes de la Réunion VI. Bulletin du Musée d'Histoire Naturelle de Paris 41, 867882.Google Scholar
Chappuis, P.A. (1954) Recherches sur la faune interstitielle des sediments marins et d'eau douce à Madagascar IV Copépodes Harpacticoides psammiques de Madagascar. Mémoires de l'Institut Scientifique de Madagascar 9, 4573.Google Scholar
Clarke, K.R. and Gorley, R.N. (2001) PRIMER v5: User Manual/Tutorial. Plymouth: PRIMER-E.Google Scholar
Coull, B.C. (1970) Shallow water meiobenthos of the Bermuda platform. Oecologia 4, 325357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coull, B.C. (1977) Marine flora and fauna of the northeastern United States. Copepoda: Harpacticoida. NOAA Technical Report NHFS Circular 399, 148.Google Scholar
Coull, B.C. (1990) Are members of the meiofauna food for higher trophic levels? Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 109, 233246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coull, B.C. and Herman, S.S. (1970) Zoogeography and parallel level-bottom communities of the meiobenthic Harpacticoida (Crustacea Copepoda) of Bermuda. Oecologia 5, 392399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crist, T.O., Veech, J.A., Gering, J.C. and Summerville, K.S. (2003) Partitioning species diversity across landscapes and regions: a hierarchical analysis of α β and γ diversity. American Naturalist 162, 734743.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jesús-Navarrete, A. (2003) Diversity of Nematoda in a Caribbean atoll: Banco Chinchorro Mexico. Bulletin of Marine Science 73, 4756.Google Scholar
De Troch, M., Fiers, F. and Vincx, M. (2001a) Alpha and beta diversity of harpacticoid copepods in a tropical seagrass bed: the relation between diversity and species' range size distribution. Marine Ecology Progress Series 215, 225236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Troch, M., Fiers, F. and Vincx, M. (2003) Niche segregation and habitat specialisation of harpacticoid copepods in a tropical seagrass bed. Marine Biology 142, 345355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Troch, M., Gurdebeke, S., Fiers, F. and Vincx, M. (2001b) Zonation and structuring factors of meiofauna communities in a tropical seagrass bed (Gazi Bay Kenya). Journal of Sea Research 45, 4561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Troch, M., Mees, J. and Wakwabi, E. (1998) Diets of abundant fishes from beach seine catches in seagrass beds of a tropical bay (Gazi Bay Kenya). Belgian Journal of Zoology 128, 119154.Google Scholar
Dufrêne, M. and Legendre, P. (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67, 345366.Google Scholar
Fiers, F. and De Troch, M. (2000) New Tetragonicipitidae (Copepoda Harpacticoida) from the Indo-Pacific. Hydrobiologia 434, 97144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J.M. (1989) An ecological and economic review of meiofauna as food for fish. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 96, 243261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gee, J.M. and Warwick, R.M. (1994) Metazoan community structure in relation to the fractal dimensions of marine macroalgae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 103, 141150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheerardyn, H., Fiers, F., Vincx, M. and De Troch, M. (2006a) Peltidiphonte gen n a new taxon of Laophontidae (Copepoda:Harpacticoida) from coral substrates of the Indo-West Pacific Ocean. Hydrobiologia 553, 171199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gheerardyn, H., Fiers, F., Vincx, M. and De Troch, M. (2006b) Two new genera of Laophontidae (Copepoda:Harpacticoida) without sexual dimorphism in the endopods of the swimming legs. Zootaxa 1327, 4162.Google Scholar
Gray, J.S. (1985) Nitrogenous excretion by meiofauna from coral-reef sediments—Mecor-5. Marine Biology 89, 3135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartzband, D.J. and Hummon, W.D. (1974) Sub-community structure in subtidal meiobenthic Harpacticoida. Oecologia 14, 3751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heip, C., Vincx, M. and Vranken, G. (1985) The ecology of marine nematodes. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 23, 399489.Google Scholar
Helmuth, B.S.T., Timmerman, B.E.H. and Sebens, K.P. (1997) Interplay of host morphology and symbiont microhabitat in coral aggregations. Marine Biology 130, 110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, G.R.F. (1977a) Species associations and seasonal population densities of marine phytal harpacticoid copepods from Cook Strait. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 11, 621643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, G.R.F. (1977b) Observations on substrate preference of marine phytal harpacticoids (Copepoda). Hydrobiologia 56, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, G.R.F. (1980) Structure of phytal harpacticoid copepod assemblages and the influence of habitat complexity and turbidity. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 44, 157192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicks, G.R.F. (1985) Meiofauna associated with rocky shore algae. In Moore, P.G. and Seed, R. (eds) The ecology of rocky coasts. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 3655.Google Scholar
Hicks, G.R.F. and Coull, B.C. (1983) The ecology of marine meiobenthic harpacticoid copepods. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, 21, 67175.Google Scholar
Hill, M.O. (1973) Diversity and evenness: a unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology 54, 427432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, S.H. (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52, 577586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jenkins, G.P., Walker-Smith, G.K. and Hamer, P.A. (2002) Elements of habitat complexity that influence harpacticoid copepods associated with seagrass beds in a termerate bay. Oecologia 131, 598605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klumpp, D.W., McKinnon, A.D. and Mundy, C.N. (1988) Motile cryptofauna of a coral reef: abundance distribution and trophic potential. Marine Ecology Progress Series 45, 95108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambshead, P.J.D., Platt, H.M. and Shaw, K.M. (1983) The detection of differences among assemblages of marine benthic species based on an assessment of dominance and diversity. Journal of Natural History 17, 859874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, K. (1948) Monographie der Harpacticiden I & II. Lund: Håkan Ohlssons Boktryckeri.Google Scholar
Lang, K. (1965) Copepoda Harpacticoidea from the Californian Pacific coast. Kungliga Svenska Vetenskapsakademiens Handlingar 10, 1566.Google Scholar
Lewis, J.B. and Snelgrove, P.V.R. (1990) Corallum morphology and composition of crustacean cryptofauna of the hermatypic coral Madracis mirabilis. Marine Biology 106, 267272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcotte, B.M. (1983) The imperatives of copepod diversity: perception, cognition, competition and predation. In Schram, F.R. (ed.) Crustacean phylogeny. Rotterdam: AA Balkema Publishers, pp. 4772.Google Scholar
Mbije, N.E., Wagner, G.M., Francis, J., Ohman, M.C. and Garpe, K. (2002) Patterns in the distribution and abundance of hard corals around Zanzibar Island. Ambio 31, 609611.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCune, B. and Mefford, M.J. (1999) PC-ORD. Multivariate analysis of ecological data, Version 4.32. Gleneden Beach, OR, USA: MjM Software.Google Scholar
Moore, P.G. (1972) Particulate matter in the sublittoral zone of an exposed coast and its ecological significance with special reference to the fauna inhabiting kelp holdfasts. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 10, 5980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, P.G. (1973) The kelp fauna of northeast Britain. II. Multivariate classification: turbidity as an ecological factor. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 13, 127163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moriarty, D.J.W., Pollard, P.C., Alongi, D.M., Wilkinson, C.R. and Gray, J.S. (1985) Bacterial productivity and trophic relationships with consumers on coral reefs (Mecor I). Proceedings of the 5th International Coral Reef Symposium 3, 457462.Google Scholar
Ndaro, S. and Ólafsson, E. (1999) Soft-bottom fauna with emphasis on nematode assemblage structure in a tropical lagoon in Zanzibar eastern Africa: I. spatial variability. Hydrobiologia 405, 133148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netto, S.A., Attrill, M.J. and Warwick, R.M. (2003) The relationship between benthic fauna carbonate sediments and reef morphology in reef-flat tidal pools of Rocal Atoll (north-east Brazil). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 83, 425432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netto, S.A., Warwick, R.M. and Attrill, M.J. (1999) Meiobenthic and macrobenthic community structure in carbonate sediments of Rocas Atoll (North-east Brazil). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 48, 3950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noodt, W. (1971) Ecology of the Copepoda. Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology 76, 97102.Google Scholar
Ólafsson, E., Ingolfsson, A. and Steinarsdottir, M.B. (2001) Harpacticoid copepod communities of floating seaweed: controlling factors and implications for dispersal. Hydrobiologia 453/454, 189200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ólafsson, E., Johnstone, R.W. and Ndaro, S.G.M. (1995) Effects of intensive seaweed farming on the meiobenthos in a tropical lagoon. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 191, 101117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pielou, E.C. (1975) Ecological diversity. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Preston, N.P. and Doherty, P.J. (1994) Cross-shelf patterns in the community structure of coral-dwelling Crustacea in the central region of the Great Barrier Reef. II. Cryptofauna. Marine Ecology Progress Series 104, 2738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raes, M., De Troch, M., Ndaro, S.G.M., Muthumbi, A., Guilini, K. and Vanreusel, A. (2007) The structuring role of microhabitat type in coral degradation zones: a case study with marine nematodes from Kenya and Zanzibar. Coral Reefs 26, 113126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifried, S. (2003) Phylogeny of Harpacticoida (Copepoda): revision of ‘Maxillipedasphalea’ and Exanechentra. Göttingen: Cuvillier.Google Scholar
Thomassin, B.A., Vivier, M.H. and Vitiello, P. (1976) Distribution de la méiofaune et de la macrofaune des sables coralliens de la retenue d'eau épirécifale du grand récif de tuléar (Madagascar). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 22, 3153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanhove, S., Vincx, M., Van Gansbeke, D., Gijselinck, W. and Schram, D. (1992) The meiobenthos of five mangrove vegetation types in Gazi Bay Kenya. Hydrobiologia 247, 99108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veech, J.A., Summerville, K.S., Crist, T.O. and Gering, J.C. (2002) The additive partitioning of species diversity: recent revival of an old idea. Oikos 99, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villiers, L. (1988) Density and biomass of macro- and meiofauna in lagoon sands at Mururoa atoll French Polynesia. Proceedings of the 6th International Coral Reef Symposium 2, 4551.Google Scholar
Villiers, L. and Bodiou, J.Y. (1996) Community structure of harpacticoid copepods in a tropical reef lagoon (Fangataufa Atoll—French Polynesia). Oceanologica Acta 19, 155162.Google Scholar
Villiers, L., Christien, D. and Sevère, A. (1987) Investigations sur l'écologie des sables lagonaires biogènes de l'atoll de Mururoa (Tuamotu-Polynésie française). ORSTOM Tahiti Notes et Documents d'Océanographie 36, 198.Google Scholar
Vincx, M. (1996) Meiofauna in marine and freshwater sediments. In Hall, G.S. (ed.) Methods for examination of organismal diversity in soils and sediments. Wallingford: CAB International, pp. 187195.Google Scholar
Vytopil, E. and Willis, B.L. (2001) Epifaunal community structure in Acropora spp (Scleractinia) on the Great Barrier Reef: implications of coral morphology and habitat complexity. Coral Reefs 20, 281288.Google Scholar
Wells, J.B.J. (1967) The littoral Copepoda (Crustacea) of Inhaca Island Mozambique. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 67, 189358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, J.B.J. and McKenzie, K.G. (1973) Report on a small collection of benthic copepods from marine and brackish waters of Aldabra Indian Ocean. Crustaceana 25, 133146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willen, E. (2000) Phylogeny of the Thalestridimorpha Lang, 1944 (Crustacea Copepoda). Göttingen: Cuvillier.Google Scholar
Willen, E. (2002) Notes on the systematic position of the Stenheliinae (Copepoda Harpacticoida) within the Thalestridimorpha and description of two new species from Motupore Island Papua New Guinea. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 43, 2742.Google Scholar
12
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Community structure and microhabitat preferences of harpacticoid copepods in a tropical reef lagoon (Zanzibar Island, Tanzania)
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Community structure and microhabitat preferences of harpacticoid copepods in a tropical reef lagoon (Zanzibar Island, Tanzania)
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Community structure and microhabitat preferences of harpacticoid copepods in a tropical reef lagoon (Zanzibar Island, Tanzania)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *