Hostname: page-component-66d9dcfd78-9877g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-09T11:28:30.581Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New species of Chaetonema (Nematoda, Anoplostomatidae) and Admirandus (Nematoda, Oncholaimidae) from Patagonia, Río Negro and Santa Cruz, Argentina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 January 2016

Virginia Lo Russo ,
Gabriela Villares  and
Catalina T. Pastor de Ward
Virginia Lo Russo
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional Patagónico (CONICET), C.C. 128 (9120) Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina
Gabriela Villares
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional Patagónico (CONICET), C.C. 128 (9120) Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina
Catalina T. Pastor de Ward*
Affiliation:
Centro Nacional Patagónico (CONICET), C.C. 128 (9120) Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina
*
Correspondence should be addressed to:C.T. Pastor de Ward, Centro Nacional Patagónico (CONICET). C.C. 128 (9120) Puerto Madryn, Chubut, Argentina email: pastor@cenpat-conicet.gob.ar
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two new species are described from the Patagonia coast of Argentina, South Atlantic, and written keys to both genera are given. Chaetonema patagonica sp. nov. can most easily be differentiated from the other four species of the genus by the amphid shape and by the absence of a precloacal organ. Admirandus sanjuliensis sp. nov. is characterized by position of the Demanian pores, one preanal and two postanal, the configuration of pre- and postcloacal papillae and setae and by having the shortest stoma in the genus.

Keywords

ChaetonematinaeAdoncholaiminaemarine NematodaPatagoniataxonomydescriptionsdichotomous keys

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 96 , Issue 8 , December 2016 , pp. 1661 - 1669
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Belogurov, O.I. and Belogurova, L.S. (1979) Morphology of three species of marine nematodes of the genus Adoncholaimus Filipjev, 1918 and validation of Admirandus multicavus gen. et sp. n. (Nematoda, Oncholaimidae). In Free-living and parasitic worms. Vladivostok: Far-eastern University, pp. 37–63.Google Scholar
De Ley, P. and Blaxter, M.L. (2004) A new system for Nematoda: combining morphological characters with molecular trees, and translating clades into ranks and taxa. Nematology Monographs and Perspectives 2, 633–653.Google Scholar
Filipjev, I.N. (1916) Free living nematodes in the collection of the Zoological Museum of the Imperial Academy of Sciences in Petrograd (in Russian, English diagnoses). Ezhegodnik Zoologicheskogo Muzeia Imperatorskoi Akademii Nauk 21, 59–116.Google Scholar
Filipjev, I.N. (1918) Free-living nematodes of the vicinities of Sevastopol. Reports of Special zoological laboratory and Sevastopol biological station of Russian Academy of Science Ser. II, 4, 1–350.Google Scholar
Filipjev, I.N. (1927) Les nématodes libres des mers septentrionales appartenant à la famille des Enoplidae. Archiv für Naturgeschichte 91A, 1–216.Google Scholar
Gassó, S. and Stein, A.F. (2007) Does dust from Patagonia reach the sub-Antarctic Atlantic Ocean? Geophysical Research Letters 34, L01801. doi: 10.1029/2006GL027693.Google Scholar
Gerlach, S.A. (1954) Nématodes marins libres des eaux souterraines littorales de Tunisie et d'Algérie. Vie Milieu 4, 221–237.Google Scholar
Gerlach, S.A. and Riemann, F. (1974) The Bremerhaven checklist of aquatic nematodes. A catalogue of Nematoda Adenophorea excluding the Dorylaimida. Part 2. Bremen: Kommissionsverlag Franz Leuwer.Google Scholar
Giere, O., Eleftheriou, A. and Murison, D.J. (1988) Abiotic factors. In Higgins, R.P. and Thiel, H. (eds) Introduction to the study of meiofauna. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 61–78.Google Scholar
Hopper, B.E. (1967) Free-living marine nematodes from Biscayne Bay, Florida. II. Oncholaimidae: descriptions of five new species and one new genus (Meyersia). Marine Biology 1, 145–151.Google Scholar
Kreis, H.A. (1932) Freilebende marine Nematoden von den Sunda-Inseln II. Oncholaiminae. (Papers from Dr. Th. Mortensen's Pacific Expedition 1914–16). Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Danssk naturhistorik Forening 93, 23–69.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, S. (1981) Entwurf eines phylogenetischen Systems der freilebenden Nematoden. Bremen: Leuwer.Google Scholar
Lorenzen, S. (1994) The phylogenetic systematics of freeliving nematodes. London: The Ray Society.Google Scholar
Platt, H.M. (1973) Freeliving marine nematodes from Strangford Lough, Northern Ireland. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 14, 295–321.Google Scholar
Rachor, E. (1969) Das de mansche organ der Oncholaimidae, eine genito-intestinale verbindung bei Nematoden. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere 66, 87–166.Google Scholar
Shimada, D. and Kajihara, H. (2014) Two new species of free-living marine nematodes of Adoncholaimus Filipjev, 1918 (Oncholaimida: Oncholaimidae: Adoncholaiminae) from Hokkaido, northern Japan, with a key to species and discussion of the genus. Nematology 16, 437–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smol, N. and Coomans, A. (2006) Order Enoplida. In Abebe, E., Andrássy, I. and Traunspurger, W. (eds) Freshwater nematodes: ecology and taxonomy. Wallingford: CABI Publishing, pp. 225–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, G. (1916) Freilebende Nematoden aus der Barentssee. Zoologische Jahrbücher (Systematik) 39, 511–664.Google Scholar
Tchesunov, A.V., Mokievsky, V.O. and Vu Thanh, N. (2010) Three new free-living nematode species (Nematoda, Enoplida) from mangrove habitats of Nha Trang, Central Vietnam. Russian Journal of Nematology 18, 155–173.Google Scholar