Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 2
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Rende, S.F. Irving, A.D. Bacci, T. Parlagreco, L. Bruno, F. De Filippo, F. Montefalcone, M. Penna, M. Trabucco, B. Di Mento, R. and Cicero, A.M. 2015. Advances in micro-cartography: A two-dimensional photo mosaicing technique for seagrass monitoring. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, Vol. 167, p. 475.

    Zapata-Ramírez, P.A. Scaradozzi, D. Sorbi, L. Palma, M. Pantaleo, U. Ponti, M. and Cerrano, C. 2013. Innovative study methods for the Mediterranean coralligenous habitats. Advances in Oceanography and Limnology, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 102.

  • Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, Volume 92, Issue 1
  • February 2012, pp. 49-62

Development of low-cost image mosaics of hard-bottom sessile communities using SCUBA: comparisons of optical media and of proxy measures of community structure

  • H. van Rein (a1), D.S. Schoeman (a1), C.J. Brown (a1) (a2), R. Quinn (a1) and J. Breen (a3)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 25 March 2011

Underwater image-based sampling procedures, using SCUBA, are compared using imagery collected from a temperate hard-substratum community. The effectiveness of a low-budget, high-resolution image mosaicing technique is assessed by comparing the relative efficiency of data collection, extraction and analysis among sampling procedures. In addition, a manipulative experiment tested whether the sampling procedures could detect the physical removal of 10% of the reef community. Overall, four factors were explored within the data: data collection media (stills and video), cover and community composition estimation techniques (visual cover estimation, frequency of occurrence and point extraction), change detection (pre- and post-impact) and depth (8, 14, 18 and 22 m). Stills imagery sampled the reef community at a higher image resolution than the video imagery, which enabled identification of more species and less-conspicuous benthic categories. Using the visual cover estimation technique, the stills imagery also had the greatest benefit in terms of efficiency and species identification. However, the experimental impact was detected using only the point extraction technique. The recommendations are that: (1) the image mosaicing technique is applied to fixed-station monitoring; (2) the point extraction technique be used for efficient and cost-effective monitoring at coarse taxonomic resolutions; and (3) survey depths remain constant over the duration of hard-substratum community monitoring.

Corresponding author
Correspondence should be addressed to: H. van Rein, Centre for Coastal and Marine Research, School of Environmental Science, University of Ulster, Coleraine, Northern Ireland, BT52 1SA email:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M.J. Anderson (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology 26, 3246.

J.C. Beaumont , C.J. Brown and M.D.J. Sayer (2007) Evaluation of techniques used in the assessment of subtidal epibiotic assemblage structure. Biofouling 23, 343356.

J.J. Bell , M. Burton , B. Bullimore , P.B. Newman and K. Lock (2006) Morphological monitoring of subtidal sponge assemblages. Marine Ecology Progress Series 311, 7991.

L. Benedetti-Cecchi , L. Airoldi , M. Abbiati and F. Cinelli (1996) Estimate the abundance of benthic invertebrates: a comparison of procedures and variability between observers. Marine Ecology Progress Series 138, 93101.

A. Borja , J. Franco and V. Perez (2000) A marine biotic index to establish the ecological quality of soft-bottom benthos within European estuarine and coastal environments. Marine Pollution Bulletin 40, 11001114.

D.A. Bowden (2005) Quantitative characterisation of shallow marine benthic assemblages at Ryder Bay, Adelaide Island, Antarctica. Marine Biology 146, 12351249.

E.K. Brown , E. Cox , P.L. Jokiel , K.S. Rodgers , W.R. Smith , B.N. Tissot , S.L. Coles and J. Hultquist (2004) Development of benthic sampling methods for the Coral Reef Assessment and Monitoring Program (CRAMP) in Hawai'i. Pacific Science 58, 145158.

M.N. Dethier , E.S. Graham , S. Cohen and L.M. Tear (1993) Visual versus random point percent cover estimations: ‘objective’ is not always better. Marine Ecology Progress Series 96, 93100.

R.J. Diaz , M. Solan and R.M. Valente (2004) A review of approaches for classifying benthic habitats and evaluating habitat quality. Journal of Environmental Management 73, 165181.

S.P. Drummond and S.D. Connell (2005) Quantifying percentage cover of subtidal organisms on rocky coasts: a comparison of the costs and benefits of standard methods. Marine and Freshwater Research 56, 865876.

P. Dumas , A. Bertaud , C. Peignon , M. Léopold and D. Pelletier (2009) A ‘quick and clean’ photographic method for the description of coral reef habitats. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 368, 161168.

A.C.R. Gleason , D. Lirman , D.E. Williams , N.R. Gracias , B.E. Gintert , H. Madjidi , R.P. Reid , G.C. Boynton , S. Negahdaripour , M.W. Miller and P. Kramer (2007) Documenting hurricane impacts on coral reefs using two dimensional video-mosaic technology. Marine Ecology 28, 254258.

A.C.R. Gleason , N. Gracias , D. Lirman , B.E. Gintert , T.B. Smith , M. Dick and R.P. Reid (2010) Landscape video mosaic from a mesophotic coral reef. Coral Reefs 29, 253–253.

N. Gracias and J. Santos-Victor (1998) Automatic mosaic creation of the ocean floor. In Oceans'98—Conference Proceedings, Volumes 1–3; IEEE OCEANS Conference and Exhibition on Engineering for Sustainable Use of the Oceans (OCEANS 98), pp. 257262.

J. Hill and C. Wilkinson (2004) Methods for ecological monitoring of coral reefs. Townsville, QL: Australian Institute of Marine Science, 117 pp.

P. Houk and R. Van Woesik (2006) Coral reef benthic video surveys facilitate long-term monitoring in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands: toward an optimal sampling strategy. Pacific Science 60, 177189.

K. Jerosch , A. Luedtke , M. Schlueter and G.T. Ioannidis (2007) Automatic content-based analysis of georeferenced image data: detection of Beggiatoa mats in seafloor video mosaics from the Halkon Mosby Mud Volcano. Computers and Geoscience 33, 202218.

K. Lam , P.K.S. Shin , R. Bradbeer , D. Randall , K.K.K. Ku , P. Hodgson and S.G. Cheung (2006) Comparison of video and point intercept transect methods of monitoring subtropical coral communities. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 333, 115128.

G.H. Leonard and R.P. Clark (1993) Point quadrat versus video transect estimates of the cover of benthic red algae. Marine Ecology Progress Series 101, 203208.

W. Leujak and R.F.G. Ormond (2007) Comparative accuracy and efficiency of six coral community survey methods. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 351, 168187.

D. Lirman , N.R. Gracias , B.E. Gintert , A.C.R. Gleason , R.P. Reid , S. Negahdaripour and P. Kramer (2007) Development and application of a video-mosaic survey technology to document the status of coral reef communities. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 125, 5973.

D. Lirman , N.R. Gracias , B.E. Gintert , A.C.R. Gleason , G. Deangelo , M. Dick , E. Martinez and R.P. Reid (2010) Damage and recovery assessment of vessel grounding injuries on coral reef habitats by use of georeferenced landscape video mosaics. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 8, 8897.

C.J.M. Martin and E.A. Martin (2002) An underwater photomosaic technique using Adobe Photoshop (TM). International Journal of Nautical Archaeology 31, 137147.

R.J. Meese and P.A. Tomich (1992) Dots on the rocks: a comparison of percent cover estimation methods. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 165, 5973.

R. Ninio , S. Delean , K. Osborne and H. Sweatman (2003) Estimating cover of benthic organisms from underwater video images: variability associated with multiple observers. Marine Ecology Progress Series 265, 107116.

D.M. Parsons , N.T. Shears , R.C. Babcock and T.R. Haggitt (2004) Fine-scale habitat change in a marine reserve, mapped using radio-acoustically positioned video transects. Marine and Freshwater Research 55, 257265.

D. Pech , A.R. Condal , E. Bourgel and P.L. Ardisson (2004) Abundance estimation of rocky shore invertebrates at small spatial scale by high-resolution digital photography and digital image analysis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 299, 185199.

L.B. Preskitt , P.S. Vroom and C.M. Smith (2004) A rapid ecological assessment (REA) quantitative survey method for benthic algae using photoquadrats with SCUBA. Pacific Science 58, 201209.

A. Puente and J.A. Juanes (2008) Testing taxonomic resolution, data transformation and selection of species for monitoring macroalgae communities. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 78, 327340.

R. Rosenberg , M. Blomqvist , H.C. Nilsson , H. Cederwall and A. Dimming (2004) Marine quality assessment by use of benthic species-abundance distribution: a proposed new protocol within the European Water Framework Directive. Marine Pollution Bulletin 49, 728739.

Y. Rzhanov and L. Mayer (2004) Deep-sea image processing. In Oceans ‘04 MTS/IEEE Techno-Ocean ‘04, Volumes 1–2, pp. 647652.

M.D.J. Sayer and C. Poonian (2007) The influences of census technique on estimating indices of macrofaunal population density in the temperate rocky subtidal zone. Underwater Technology 27, 119139.

H. Van Rein , C.J. Brown , R. Quinn and J. Breen (2009) A review of sublittoral monitoring methods in temperate waters: a focus on scale. Underwater Technology 28, 115.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
  • ISSN: 0025-3154
  • EISSN: 1469-7769
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-marine-biological-association-of-the-united-kingdom
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *