Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T14:03:05.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epibiotic communities on sublittoral macroinvertebrates at Signy Island, Antarctica

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

David K. A. Barnes  and
Andrew Clarke
David K. A. Barnes
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OET
Andrew Clarke
Affiliation:
British Antarctic Survey, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OET
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The epibiotic communities on locally abundant macroinvertebrates, in particular the brachiopod Liothyrella uva and the limpet Nacella concinna, were examined from depths between 0 and 50 m at Signy Island, Antarctica. The percentage cover by epibionts on Liothyrella increased from <20% on the smallest individuals to >50% on the largest, and decreased slightly with depth. The percentage cover of Nacella by epibionts increased with size of individual over an approximately similar range of values, but in contrast with Liothyrella increased greatly with depth. Cheilostome bryozoans and annelids of the genus Spirorbis formed >90% (by area) of the colonists on Liothyrella and 30–60% on Nacella, the coralline alga Lithothamnion and sponges making up the remainder. The bryozoans, which generally dominated the epibiotic communities, comprised complex associations of species which could be described as either generalists, host-specific epibiotic, low specificity epibiotic or locally abundant background species. Positive associations of both occurrence and abundance were found between some of the bryozoans living epibiotically on the brachiopod Liothyrella. The overgrowth interactions recorded, between the three main epibiotic faunal taxa; sponges, bryozoans and annelids, were essentially hierarchical. Sponges usually overgrew Bryozoa, and Bryozoa overgrew Spirorbis as well as occasion-ally smothering small brachiopods. In four adult Liothyrella death may have been caused by the epibiotic bryozoan Arachnopusia inchoata growing over the gape, so preventing feeding and/or respiration.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom , Volume 75 , Issue 3 , August 1995 , pp. 689 - 703
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ager, D.V., 1961. The epifauna of a Devonian spiriferid. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, 117, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Y.C., De Stasio, B.T. & Ramcharan, C.W., 1993. Individual and population level consequences of an algal epibiont on Daphnia. Limnology and Oceanography, 38, 592–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A., 1994. Communities of epibiota on two erect species of Antarctic Bryozoa. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 74, 863–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A., 1995a. Sublittoral epifaunal communities at Signy Island, Antarctica. I. The ice-foot zone. Marine Biology, 121, 555–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A., 1995b. Sublittoral epifaunal communities at Signy Island, Antarctica. II. Below the ice-foot zone. Marine Biology, 121, 565–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A., 1995c. Seasonal and annual growth in erect species of Antarctic bryozoans. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 188, 181–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A. & Clarke, A., 1994. Seasonal variation in the feeding activity of four species of Antarctic bryozoan in relation to environmental factors. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 181, 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A. & Clarke, A., 1995. Seasonality of feeding activity Antarctic suspension feeders. Polar Biology, 15, 335–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A. & Rothery, P., 1995. Competition in encrusting Antarctic bryozoan assemblages: outcomes, influences and implications. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, D.K.A.Rothery, P. & Clarke, A., 1995. Colonisation and development in encrusting communities from the Antarctic intertidal and sublittoral. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, in press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belyaev, G.M. & Uschakov, P.V., 1957. Certain regularities in the quantitative distribution of the benthic fauna in Antarctic waters. Doklady Akademii Nauk, SSSR, 112, 137–140.Google Scholar
Bloom, S.A., 1975. The motile escape response of a sessile prey: a sponge-scallop mutualism. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 17, 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckley, W.J. & Ebersole, J.P., 1994. Symbiotic organisms increase the vulnerability of a hermit crab to predation. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 182, 49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dayton, P.K., 1971. Competition, disturbance, and community organisation: the provision and subsequent utilisation of space in a rocky intertidal community. Ecological Monographs, 41, 351–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doherty, P.J., 1979. A demographic study of a subtidal population of the New Zealand articulate brachiopod Terebratella inconspicua. Marine Biology, 52, 331–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M.W., 1974. Recent Antarctic and Subantarctic brachiopods. Washington, DC: American Geophysical Union. [Antarctic Research Series, vol. 21.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frazier, J.G., Winston, J.E. & Ruckdeschel, C.A., 1992. Epizoan communities on marine turtles. III. Bryozoa. Bulletin of Marine Science, 51, 1–8.Google Scholar
Galéron, J., Herman, R.L., Arnaud, P.M., Arntz, W.E., Hain, S. & Klages, M., 1992. Macrofaunal communities on the continental shelf and slope of the southeastern Weddell Sea, Antarctica. Polar Biology, 3, 283–290.Google Scholar
Hammond, L.S., 1984. Epibiota from the valves of recent Lingula (Brachiopoda). Journal of Paleontology, 58, 1528–1531.Google Scholar
Hayward, P.J., 1991. Systematic studies on some Antarctic and Subantarctic Ascophora (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 101, 299–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J., 1992. Some Antarctic and Subantarctic species of Celleporidae (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata). Journal of Zoology, 226, 283–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J., 1993. New species of cheilostomate Bryozoa from Antarctica and the Subantarctic southwest Atlantic. Journal of Natural History, 27, 1409–1430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J. & Ryland, J.S., 1990. Some Antarctic and Subantarctic species of Microporellidae (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata). Journal of Natural History, 24, 1263–1287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J. & Thorpe, J.P., 1988a. Species of Chaperiopsis (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata) collected by ‘;Discovery’ investigations. Journal of Natural History, 21, 45–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J. & Thorpe, J.P., 1988b. A new family of cheilostome bryozoans endemic to the Antarctic. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 93, 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J. & Thorpe, J.P., 1988c. Species of Arachnopusia (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata) collected by the ‘Discovery’ investigations. Journal of Natural History, 22, 773–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J. & Thorpe, J.P., 1988d. New genera of Antarctic cheilostome Bryozoa. Cahiers de Biologie Marine, 29, 277–296.Google Scholar
Hayward, P.J. & Thorpe, J.P., 1989a. Membraniporoidia, Microporoidea and Cellarioidea (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata) collected by ‘Discovery’ expeditions. Journal of Natural History, 23, 913–960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J. & Thorpe, J.P., 1989b. Systematic notes on some Antarctic Ascophora (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata). Zoologica Scripta, 18, 365–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, P.J. & Thorpe, J.P., 1990. Some Antarctic and Subantarctic species of Smittinidae (Bryozoa, Cheilostomata). Journal of Zoology, 222, 137–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J.B.C., 1977. Competition on marine hard substrata: the adaptive significance of solitary and colonial strategies. American Naturalist, 111, 743–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackson, J.B.C., 1979. Overgrowth competition between encrusting cheilostome ectoprocts in a Jamaican cryptic reef environment. Journal of Animal Ecology, 48, 805–823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, M.A., Ansell, A.D., Collins, M.J., Curry, G.B., Peck, L.S. & Rhodes, M.C., 1992. Biology of living brachiopods. Advances in Marine Biology, 28, 332–346.Google Scholar
Kesling, R.V., Hoare, R.D. & Sparkes, D.K., 1980. Epizoans of the Middle Devonian brachiopod Paraspirifer bownockeri: their relationship to one another and to their host. Journal of Paleontology, 54, 1141–1154.Google Scholar
Knox, G.A., 1970. Antarctic marine ecosystems. In Antarctic ecology (ed. M., Holgate), pp. 67–96. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Laihonen, P. & Furman, E.R., 1986. The site of settlement indicates commensalism between blue mussel and its epibionts. Oecologia, 71, 38–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Landman, N.H., Saunders, W.B., Winston, J.E. & Harries, P.J., 1987. Incidence and kinds of epizoans on the shells of live Nautilus. In Nautilus (ed. W.B., Saunders and N.H., Landman), pp. 163–177. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lohse, D.P., 1993. The effects of substratum type on the population dynamics of three common intertidal animals. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 173, 133–154.Google Scholar
McKinney, F.K. & Jackson, J.B.C., 1991. Bryozoan evolution, pp. 167–189. London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Nolan, C.P., 1991. Size, shape and shell morphology in the Antarctic limpet Nacella concinna at Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Journal ofMolluscan Studies, 57, 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paine, R.T., 1974. Intertidal community structure: experimental studies on the relationship between a dominant competitor and its principal predator. Oecologia, 15, 93–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Picken, G.B., 1980. The distribution, growth, and reproduction of the Antarctic limpet Nacella (Patinigera) concinna (Strebel, 1908). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 42, 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, J.A., 1985. Mortality and avoidance of competitive overgrowth in encrusting Bryozoa. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 23, 291–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanderson, W.G., Thorpe, J.P. & Clarke, A., 1994. A preliminary study of feeding rates in the Antarctic cheilostome bryozoan Himantozoum antarcticum. In Biology and Palaeobiology of Bryozoans (ed. P.J., Hayward et al.), pp. 167–170. Fredensborg: Olsen & Olsen.Google Scholar
Seed, R. & O'connor, R.J., 1981. Community organisation in marine algal epifaunas. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 12, 49–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbing, A.R.D., 1972. Preferential settlement of a bryozoan and serpulid larvae on the younger parts of Laminaria fronds. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 52, 765–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P.D., 1979. Palaeoecology of the encrusting epifauna of some British Jurassic bivalves. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology and Palaeoecology, 28, 241–262.Google Scholar
Thayer, C.W., 1975. Size frequency and population structure of brachiopods. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology and Palaeoecology, 17, 139–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thayer, C.W. & Allmon, R.A., 1990. Unpalatable thecideid brachiopods from Palau: ecological and evolutionary implications. In Brachiopods through time (ed. D.I., MacKinnon et al.), pp. 253–259. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Tressler, W.L,, 1964. Marine bottom productivity at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. In Antarctic biology. Proceedings of the First SCAR Symposium of Antarctic Biology (ed. R., Carrick), pp. 323–331. Paris: Hermann.Google Scholar
Weissman, P., Lonsdale, D.J. & Yen, J., 1993. The effect of peritrich ciliates on the production of Acartia hudsonica in Long Island Sound. Limnology and Oceanography, 38, 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willey, R.L., Cantrell, P.A. & Threlkeld, S.T., 1990. Epibiotic euglenoid flagellates increase the susceptibility of some zooplankton to fish predation. Limnology and Oceanography, 35, 952–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, M.G. & Robins, M.W., 1972. Biomass estimates from Borge Bay, Signy Island, South Orkney Islands. Bulletin. British Antarctic Survey, 31, 45–50.Google Scholar
Winston, J.E., 1983. Patterns of growth, reproduction and mortality in bryozoans from the Ross Sea, Antarctica. Bulletin of Marine Science, 33, 688–702.Google Scholar
Winston, J.E. & Heimberg, B.F., 1988. The role of bryozoans in the benthic community at Low Island, Antarctica. Antarctic Journal of the United States, 21, 188–189.Google Scholar
Witman, J.D. & Suchanek, T.H., 1984. Mussels in flow: drag and dislodgement by epizoans. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 16, 259–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar