Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T06:53:51.740Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A New Species of Ochetostoma (Echiura, Echiuridae) Found in the Azores With Notes on its Ecology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2009

Alex D. Rogers
Affiliation:
Marine Biological Association, The Laboratory, Citadel Hill, Plymouth, PL1 2PB
Richard D.M. Nash
Affiliation:
Port Erin Marine Laboratory, University of Liverpool, Port Erin, Isle of Man

Extract

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 145 species of the phylum Echiura have been described to the present date (Popkov, 1992). Since Stephen & Edmonds' (1972) monograph detailing the known species of Echiura, few new species have been described. The majority of these have been members of the family Bonelliidae from the deep-sea (i.e. Murina, 1976, 1978; DattaGupta, 1977,1981; Biseswar, 1992) with a few exceptions (e.g. Thalassema malakhovi in Popkov, 1992 and Ochetostoma natalense in Biseswar, 1988).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Annandale, N., 1922. The marine element in the fauna of the Ganges. Bijdragen Tot de Dierkunde, 22, 143154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, R.J.A. & Chapman, C.J., 1984. Resin casting: a technique for investigating burrows in sublittoral sediments. Progress in Underwater Science, 9, 1525.Google Scholar
Baird, W.B., 1868. Monograph of the species of worms belonging to the subclass Gephyrea; with a notice of such species as are contained in the collection of the British Museum. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 1868, 76114.Google Scholar
Biseswar, R., 1988. Ochetostoma (Echiura) from southern Africa with a description of a new species. Annals of the South African Museum, 98(2), 2975.Google Scholar
Biseswar, R., 1992. Some deepsea echiurans of the North-East Atlantic. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle. Paris, 4th series, 14, section A, nos. 3–4, 639654.Google Scholar
Blainville, H.M.D. de, 1827. Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles. Vers, 49, 305313.Google Scholar
Bock, S., 1942. On the structure and affinities of ‘Thalassema’ lankesteri Herdman and the classification of the group Echiuroidea. Goteborgs K Vetenskaps- och Vitterhetssamhalles Handlingar, Series B, band.2, no. 6, 194.Google Scholar
Chuang, S.H., 1962. Feeding mechanism of the echiuroid, Ochetostoma erythrogrammon Leukart & Rueppell, 1828. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 62, 8085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dattagupta, A.K., 1977. A new genus and a new species of bonelline Echiura from the Caribbean deepsea. Proceedings of the Zoological Society, Calcutta, 30, 1723.Google Scholar
Dattagupta, A.K., 1981. Atlantic Echiurans. Part I. Report on twenty-two species of deepsea echiurans of the North and the South Atlantic Ocean. Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 4th series, 3, section A, no. 2, 353378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dattagupta, A.K., 1985. Echiura, a significant component of benthic community. In Peuplements profonds du Golfe de Gascogne: campagne BIOGAS (ed. L., Laubier and C., Monniot), pp. 375378. IFREMER: France.Google Scholar
Edmonds, S.J., 1960. Some Australian echiuroids (Echiuroidea). Transactions of the Royal Society of Southern Australia, 83, 8996.Google Scholar
Fisher, W.K. & Macginitie, G.E., 1928 a. The natural history of an echiuroid worm. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 10, no. 1, 204213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, W.K. & Macginitie, G.E., 1928 b. A new echiuroid worm from California. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 10, no. 1, 199204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greeff, R., 1879. Die Echiuren (Gephyrea armata). Nova Ada Academia Caesarea Leopoldino Carolinae Germanicae Naturae Curiosorum, 41, 1172.Google Scholar
Hughes, D.J., Ansell, A.D., Atkinson, R.J.A. & Nickell, L.A., 1993. Underwater television observations of surface activity of the echiuran worm Maxmuelleria lankesteri (Echiura: Bonelliidae). Journal of Natural History, 27, 219248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuckart, F.S. & Rüppell, W.P.S., ed., 1828. Neue wirbellose Thiere des rothen Meeres. Atlas zur der Reise in Nürdlichen Africa 1, Zoologie, 69.Google Scholar
Macginitie, G.E., 1935. Normal functioning and experimental behaviour of the egg and sperm collectors of the echiuroid, Urechis caupo. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 70, 341352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murina, V.V., 1976. New abyssal species of echiurans from the Pacific and Atlantic Oceans. Zoologicheskii Zhurnal, 55, 837843. [In Russian with English summary.]Google Scholar
Murina, V.V., 1978. New and rare echiurids of the family Bonelliidae. Trudy Instituta Okeanologii im P.P. Shirshova, Akademiya Nauk SSSR, 113, 107119. [In Russian with English summary.]Google Scholar
Popkov, D.V., 1992. A new echiuran species Thalassema malakhovi (Echiura) from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 26, 379383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redfield, A.C. & Florkin, M., 1931. The respiratory function of the blood of Urechis caupo. Biological Bulletin. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, 11, 185210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saxena, R., 1983. Significance of the gonoduct in the classification of echiurans (phylum Echiura). Journal of Zoology, 199, 149156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spengel, J. W., 1912. Uber den Hautmuskelschlauch gewisser Thalassema-arten und siene Bedeutung für die Systematik dieser Thiere. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschafl, 22, 309317.Google Scholar
Stephen, A.C. & Edmonds, S.J., 1972. The phyla Sipuncula and Echiura. London: Trustees of the British Museum (Natural History).Google Scholar
Stull, J.K., Haydock, C.I. & Montagne, D.E., 1986. Effects of Listriolobus pelodes (Echiura) on coastal shelf benthic communities and sediments modified by a major Californian wastewater dis-charge. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 22, 117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar