A Dravidian turn in Apabhraṃśa

^{page 35 note 1} See Hoernle, A. F. R., A Comparative Grammar of the Gaudian languages, London, 1880, p. 227; cf. Beames, J., A Comparative Grammar of the Modern Aryan languages of India, vol. ii, London, 1875, p. 236; Pischel, , Siddhahema, i, p. 158, ii, p. 189, though later than Hoernle, renders hontau by Skt. bhavān; cf. Alsdorf, , Apabhraṃśa-Studien, pp. 22 ff.; Tagare, G. V., Historical Grammar of Apabhraṃśa, Poona, 1948, p. 192 f.

^{page 36 note 1} Hoernle, op. cit., p. 228, takes tāhṃto as tā-hiṃto, the latter element of which he suggests to be a modification of the present participle of ho-; new evidence, however, shows that we must divide tāhiṃ-to (Skt. -tas) as already proposed by Lasseu, , Institutiones linguæ pracriticæ, p. 310.

^{page 39 note 1} See Alsdorf, L., Apabhraṃśa-Studien, pp. 22 ff.; cf. idem, Harivaṃśapurāṇa, p. 180.

^{page 39 note 2} See Tagare, G. V., Historical Grammar of Apabhraṃśa, p. 193 f.

^{page 40 note 1} See Caldwell, R., A Comparative Grammar of the Dravidian or South-Indian family of languages², London, 1875, pp. 179 ff.; Vinson, J., Manuel de la langue tamoule, Paris, 1903, p. 73 f.

^{page 41 note 1} It should be noticed that in this connection the verbal participle is synchronous with the principal verb, and accordingly exactly covers Ap. hontau; with Beames' explanation (ii, p. 236), adopted by Hoernle and admitted by Alsdorf, I cannot agree.

^{page 42 note 1} Beames, , Comparative Grammar, ii, p. 234.

^{page 42 note 2} See Dhar, Lakshmi, Padumavātī, A Linguistic study of the sixteenth-century Hindi, London, 1949.

^{page 42 note 3} Bloch, J., La Formation de la langue marathe, Paris, 1919, pp. 193 and 206; cf. Pischel, , Grammatik der Prāhritsprachen, Strassburg, 1900, p. 396.

^{page 42 note 4} See Beames, J., Grammar of the Bengālī language, Oxford, 1894, pp. 16 ff.