Skip to main content
×
Home

India–China Border Dispute: Boundary-Making and Shaping of Material Realities from the Mid-Nineteenth to Mid-Twentieth Century

  • JOE THOMAS KARACKATTU (a1)
Abstract

This paper revisits the intersection of the 19th and 20th century to bring into focus hitherto unused archival and diplomatic correspondence from the attempts to define and delimit a boundary between India and China. The theoretical point of departure for the paper is to discern how perception (knowledge, beliefs, and norms) relating to the boundary evolved over time to alter the meaning and construction of the material reality i.e. the boundary itself. In doing so it establishes how what each country deems today, as its ‘traditional customary boundary’ was not an unambiguous fixed one, but was mutable across different time periods. The political importance of the selection of these boundary lines did not lie in their being ‘true’, or in the claim being ‘real’ but in their being shared by a process of political selection, and then being reified in the respective countries.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Enclosures of a letter to Her Majesty's Secretary of State for India, No 186, dated 25 September 1895, From Simla, Foreign Department. Forwarded by Barnes H. S. (Esq., C. S. Resident in Kashmir) to the Secretary, Government of India (Foreign Dept) titled “Chinese Boundary with Ladakh and Hunza, and the trade route between India and Chinese Turkistan”, Foreign Office Press No 777-25-9-95-26, Political and Secret department, Reg Nos 405–461.
Note of the Viceroy (dated 12 September 1917; labeled ‘Foreign Secret’) in India Office Records, L/P&S/11/81, Political and Secret Annual Files, 1912 – 1930, Register No 3475 (Put away with 3122/14), British Library, Fische 684.
“Tibet Conference (confidential): Final Memorandum” prepared by Henry McMahon; India Office Records, Political and Secret Department Records, in L/P&S/11/81; Also available as Fiche 684, 16–23 of 75 in L/P&S/11/81.
Letter from Government of India in the Foreign Department to the Right Honourable W. St. J. F. Brodrick, His Majesty's Secretary of State for India, dated Simla, 5 November, 1903 (received 23 November, 1903) in ‘Papers relating to Tibet’, in India Office Records, Parliamentary Branch Records (c1772-1952) in L/Parl/2/334.
Convention between the Governments of Great Britain and Tibet signed at Lhasa on the 7th September 1904, in India Office Records, Parliamentary Branch Records (c1772-1952) in L/Parl/2/334, p. 273.
File 464/13; No 4768; India Foreign Secretary's No 45 M.
McMahon's memorandum P4692 dated 28 October 1913.
Note B 201 (S. 224) Secret: ‘Tibet: The Simla Conference’ in India Office Records, Political and Secret Department Records 1756-c1950 in L/P&S/11/81, Register No 3475 (filed with 3122/14).
Chinese Aggression in War and Peace: Letters of the Prime Minister of India (1962), Delhi: Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Government of India.
Gazetteer of Kashmir and Ladak (together with routes in the territories of the Maharaja of Jamu and Kashmir) compiled under the direction of the Quarter Master General in India in the Intelligence Branch, Calcutta: The Superintendent of Government Printing, India, 1890.
Government of India: Military Report on Sinkiang (Chinese Turkestan), 1929, General Staff, India, Case No 26110/M03/Books, Pol and Secret Dept, Calcutta, GOI Press, 1929.
Prime Minister on Sino-Indian Relations: Vol I (Part I: 1961 & Part II: 1962), New Delhi: External Publicity Division, Ministry of External Affairs, GOI.
The Sino-Indian Boundary Question (Enlarged Edition) (1962), Peking: Foreign Languages Press, November 1962.
Adler Emanuel, “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics”, European Journal of International Relations, Vol. 3 (3), (London, 1997), pp. 319363.
Gupta Karunakar (1971), “The McMahon Line 1911–45: The British Legacy”, The China Quarterly, No. 47 (July - September 1971), pp. 521545.
Huttenback Robert A (1975), “The ‘Great Game’ in the Pamirs and the Hindu- Kush: The British Conquest of Hunza and Nagar”, Modern Asian Studies, Volume 9, Issue 01, January 1975, pp 129.
Kiernan VG (1955), “Kashghar and the Politics of Central Asia, 1868–1878”, Cambridge Historical Journal, Vol. 11, No. 3 (1955), pp. 317342.
Lamb Alastair, The China-India Border. The Origins of the Disputed Boundaries, (Chatham House Essays.), London: Published for the Royal Institute of International Affairs by Oxford University Press, (Oxford, 1964).
Liu Chuan Kuan and Wu Yu Sheng (eds; 1994), Shijiu Shiji de Xianggang (19th Century Hong Kong) (Xianggang, 1994).
Masahiro Miyoshi (2009), “Sovereignty and International Law”, paper presented at Durham University, available online at https://www.dur.ac.uk/resources/ibru/conferences/sos/masahiro_miyoshi_paper.pdf, Accessed 12 October 2014.
Maxwell Neville), India's China War, (Dehra Dun, 2013) (Revised and Updated Edition).
Mehra Parshotam, An ‘Agreed’ Frontier: Ladakh and India's Northernmost Borders, 1846–1947, (Delhi, 1992).
Myatt Tim, “Trinkets, Temples, and Treasures: Tibetan Material Culture and the 1904 British Mission to Tibet”, October 2011, Accessed online (29 June 2015) at URL: http://himalaya.socanth.cam.ac.uk/collections/journals/ret/pdf/ret_21_07.pdf
Noorani A. G. (5th impression), India-China Boundary Problem 1846–1947: History and Diplomacy, (Delhi and Oxford, 2013).
Norbu Dawa, “The Genesis of Tibetan “Autonomy” and “Suzerainty”, China's Tibet Policy, Durham East Asia Series, (Richmond, 2001).
Palace Wendy, The British Empire and Tibet 1900–1922, (New York, 2005).
Kirk W., “The Inner Asian Frontier of India”, Transactions and Papers (Institute of British Geographers)”, No. 31 (Dec., 1962), pp. 131168, published by Wiley for The Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographers).
Rose Archibald, “Chinese Frontiers of India”, The Geographical Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3, March, 1912. pp. 193218.
Searle John R., The Construction of Social Reality, (New York, 1995).
Stewart Gordon T., Journeys to Empire: Enlightment, Imperailism, and the British Encounter with Tibet, 1774–1904, (Cambridge, 2009).
Teichman Eric, Travels of a consular officer in Eastern Tibet; together with a history of the relations between China, Tibet and India, (Cambridge, 1922).
The Diaries of Sir Ernest Satow, British Envoy in Peking (1900-06) (2007), In Two Volumes Volume One: 1900–03 Volume Two: 1904–06; Edited and Annotated by Ruxton Ian C., Kyushu Institute of Technology Academic Repository; April 2007; Accessed online (on 04 July 2015) at URL: https://ds.lib.kyutech.ac.jp/dspace/bitstream/10228/430/2/02_Satow_Peking_Diary_Vol_Two_1904-06.pdf
Wilkinson Glenn R., “The blessings of war: The depiction of military force in Edwardian newspapersJournal of Contemporary History, Vol 33 (1) 1998, pp. 97115.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Journal of the Royal Asiatic Society
  • ISSN: 1356-1863
  • EISSN: 1474-0591
  • URL: /core/journals/journal-of-the-royal-asiatic-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 35 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 338 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 24th July 2017 - 13th December 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.